The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism software inc

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States

Prism Software Inc. is a data analysis and graphing software that enables users to visualize and interpret data. It provides a range of features for data analysis, including curve fitting, statistical analysis, and the creation of publication-quality graphs and charts.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

5 protocols using prism software inc

1

Comparative Toxin Gene Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mean values ± SD were calculated for each toxin gene using a Student's t-test. A difference of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (GraphPad Prism Software Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Biological Triplicates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GraphPad PRISM Software, Inc. (San Diego, CA, www.graphpad.com) was used for all statistical analyses. To determine significance of the data, t test (unpaired) or analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. All experiments were performed at least in biological triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Viability Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The statistical significance of the differences between the relative cell viabilities of control and treated cell cultures was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Bonferroni’s post hoc test (GraphPad PRISM Software Inc., version 5, San Diego, CA, USA). Values of p < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Analysis of HPV and OSCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were carried out in triplicate, and at least three independent experiments were performed. The association between HPV status and OSCC was examined using Chi-square tests in SPSS software version 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data of mRNA expression were normalized relative to GAPDH gene expression. The results were analyzed and graphed using GraphPad Prism Software Inc. version 8.0 (Graphpad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests, Mann–Whitney rank-sum tests, or one-way ANOVAs. A result was regarded as statistically significant if the p-value was <0.05. To assess the heterogeneity of our metanalysis, Cochran’s Q-based Chi-squared test and I2 statistics were performed. When the calculated I2 was more than 50% and/or the presence of a p < 0.10 for the Cochran’s Q test, the analysis was considered as having significant heterogeneity [41 (link)]. Based on the heterogeneity, the fixed or random-effects model of HPV prevalence DNA and HPV genotypes in oral cancer was calculated. The association between HPV16 DNA infection and OSCC risk was evaluated by pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the cases to other risks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Molecular Analysis of Cellular Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All summary data are presented as the mean ± s.e.m. Although no statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes for the studies, our sample sizes were similar to those generally used in the field. Differences between 2 groups were analyzed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data from multiple groups were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison (GraphPad Prism Software Inc.). Differences with a P-value < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!