The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using 18o water

1

Glycosylation Profile Analysis of RC1 and RC1-4fill

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The glycosylation profiles of RC1 and RC1–4fill were determined
as previously described [REF]. Briefly, samples were denatured with Lys-C
(Promega), Arg-C (Promega), Glu-C (Promega), and chymotrypsin (Promega).
Following digestion, the samples were deglycosylated by Endo-H (Promega) and
PNGaseF (Glyko®, Prozyme) in the presence of 18O-water
(Cambridge Isotope Laboratories). The resulting peptides were separated on an
Acclaim PepMap RSLC C18 column (75 μm x 15 cm) and analyzed using an
Orbitrap Fusion™ Lumos™ Tribrid™ mass spectrometer (Thermo
Fisher Scientific) with a 240-min linear gradient consisting of 1–100%
solvent B over 180 min at a flow rate of 200 nL/min. Full MS scans were acquired
using the Fusion instrument software (v2.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the
resulting spectra were analyzed and filtered using SEQUEST (Proteome Discoverer
1.4, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and ProteoIQ (v2.7, Premier Biosoft). Site
occupancy was calculated using spectral counts assigned to the
18O-Asp-containing (PNGaseF-cleaved) and/or HexNAc-modified
(EndoH-cleaved) peptides and their unmodified counterparts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Glycosylation Profile Analysis of RC1 and RC1-4fill

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The glycosylation profiles of RC1 and RC1–4fill were determined
as previously described [REF]. Briefly, samples were denatured with Lys-C
(Promega), Arg-C (Promega), Glu-C (Promega), and chymotrypsin (Promega).
Following digestion, the samples were deglycosylated by Endo-H (Promega) and
PNGaseF (Glyko®, Prozyme) in the presence of 18O-water
(Cambridge Isotope Laboratories). The resulting peptides were separated on an
Acclaim PepMap RSLC C18 column (75 μm x 15 cm) and analyzed using an
Orbitrap Fusion™ Lumos™ Tribrid™ mass spectrometer (Thermo
Fisher Scientific) with a 240-min linear gradient consisting of 1–100%
solvent B over 180 min at a flow rate of 200 nL/min. Full MS scans were acquired
using the Fusion instrument software (v2.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the
resulting spectra were analyzed and filtered using SEQUEST (Proteome Discoverer
1.4, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and ProteoIQ (v2.7, Premier Biosoft). Site
occupancy was calculated using spectral counts assigned to the
18O-Asp-containing (PNGaseF-cleaved) and/or HexNAc-modified
(EndoH-cleaved) peptides and their unmodified counterparts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Gel Electrophoresis and Protein Digestion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4–15% Mini-PROTEAN® TGX Precast Protein Gels, 15-well, 15 μl (Bio-Rad); SimplyBlue SafeStain (Invitrogen); dithiothreitol (Sigma); iodoacetamide (Sigma); alpha lytic protease (New England BioLabs); chymotrypsin (Athens Research and Technology); AspN (Promega); Glu-C (Promega); trypsin (Promega); endoglycosidase H (Promega); PNGaseF (Promega); 18O water (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

IgG1 Antibody Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were reagent grade or above.
Guanidine hydrochloride (GndHCl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
(EDTA), dithiothreitol (DTT), iodoacetic acid (IAA), trifluoroacetic
acid (TFA), acetonitrile (ACN), HPLC-grade water, and bradykinin were
from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Sequencing grade trypsin, GluC,
and Asp-N were from Roche (Indianapolis, IN). 18O-water
(97%) was from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Andover, MA). Recombinant
monoclonal IgG1 antibody (antistreptavidin immunoglobulin gamma 1)
was produced in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells (Amgen, Thousand
Oaks, CA), purified according to standard manufacturing procedures,
formulated at a concentration of 30 mg/mL in 50 mM sodium acetate
at pH 5.2, and stored at −70 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis and Characterization of 18O-NAM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This compound was synthesized as described previously.39 (link),55 Briefly, 3-cyanopyridine (100 mg, 0.96 mmol) and 1,1′,3,3′-tetramethylguanidine (5.1 mg, 0.04 mmol) were dissolved in 200 μL 18O-water (97%, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories). The solution was heated at 100°C for 1 h before water and 1,1′,3,3′-tetramethylguanidine were removed by lyophilization. After crystallization from benzene, 18O-NAM was obtained (102 mg, 0.82 mmol, 85% yield). The incorporation of 18O was determined to be 96.5% by MALDI-TOF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synthesis of 18F-FLT Radiotracer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
18F-FLT was synthesized in a TRACERlab MXFDG (GE Healthcare) using an ABX-FLT kit (ABX) [14 (link)]. No-carrier-added 18F-fluoride was produced via the 18O(p,n)18F reaction from > 98% enriched 18O-water (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) on an RDS eclipse RD/HP medical cyclotron (Siemens/CTI). The radiochemical purity of the final product was > 99%, and the yield was 12.3 ± 4.6% (end of synthesis, n = 17).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isotope Labeling of Nicotinonitrile via Oxidation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In a pressure tube, placed under vacuum and then filled with argon, [15N,13C]nicotinonitrile (0.306 g, 0.0029 mol) was added, followed by manganese oxide (0.05 g; 0.6 mmol) and [18O]water (from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, 97 atom % 18O) (0.350 mL, 0.019 mol, 6.5 equiv.) added from a syringe under an argon atmosphere. The tube was closed with a threaded PTFE cap, immersed in an oil bath and heated therein at 70–85°C overnight. The tube was allowed to cool down to room temperature and the content of the tube was dissolved in a 1:1 DCM/acetonitrile mixture. The solution was filtered twice through a filter paper and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to give a white solid (0.280 g, 78%). 1H NMR (D2O), δ, ppm: 7.48 (dd, 1H, 3JHH= 8.0 Hz, 3JHH= 5.1 Hz, H5), 8.14 (dddd, 1H, 3JHC= 8.0 Hz, 3JHH= 3.9 Hz, 4JHH= 2.2 Hz, 4JHH= 1.9 Hz, H4), 8.61 (apparent d, 1H, 3JHH= 4.5 Hz, H6), 8.83 (br s, 1H, H2). 13C NMR (D2O), δ, ppm: 124.16 (d, 3JCC=3.5 Hz, C5), 129.28 (dd, 1JCC=64.5 Hz, 2JNC=7.1 Hz, C3), 136.43 (2JCC=2.0 Hz, C4), 147.61 (d, 2JCC=3.6 Hz, C2), 151.79 (C6), 170.75 (d, 1JNC=17.6 Hz, 13C(O)−15N). HRMS found: 127.05930. Calculated for 13C12C5H715N14N18O (M+1): 127.05992.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Reduction, Alkylation, and Trypsin Digestion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each sample, 3 mg of protein was reduced in 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) at 56 °C for 30 min and alkylated in 15 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) at room temperature for 30 min in the dark. Pure proteins were obtained via trichloroacetic acid/acetone precipitation. For trypsin digestion, protein pellets were resuspended in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ABC) buffer and proteolytically cleaved with 20 μg of sequencing-grade trypsin (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) at a ratio of 50:1 (protein:enzyme, w/w) at 37 °C overnight. The digested peptides were dried using a speed-vac and immediately re-dissolved in 50 µL of 50 mM calcium chloride, followed by the addition of trypsin (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) at a ratio of 50:1 (protein:enzyme, w/w). For enzymatic labeling, peptides were differentially labeled with either 16O or 18O water (97%, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, MA, USA) containing 20% acetonitrile and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Labeling was stopped using 1% TFA. Peptide concentration was measured using a quantitative colorimetric peptide assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For comparison, two labeled samples were mixed in equal amounts and dried.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!