The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using cd62l pe

1

Regulatory T-cell Induction from Naive T-cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total spleen cells from OT-II mice were filtered through a 40μm cell strainer. After red blood cell lysis with ACK buffer, the remaining cells were stained with antibodies targeting CD4 BV711 (Biolegend 100549), CD25 FITC (Biolegend 102005), CD44 AF647 (Biolegend 103017), CD62L PE (Biolegend 104407), TCRb PE-Cy7 (Biolegend 109222), CD11c V450 (BD 560369), MHCII AF700 (Biolegend 107622) and the viability dye eFluor780 (eBioscience 65-0865-14). Naïve T-cells and CD11c+ MHCII+ APCs were FACS-sorted on a FACS aria and subsequently co-cultured at a ratio of 5:1 in the presence of 1 μg/ml OVA peptide 323-339 (EMC BAP-250) and 5ng/ml rmTGF-β1 (R&D Systems, 7666-MB) for 72 hours. Staining of regulatory T-cells and FACS analysis was conducted as described in “Flow cytometric analysis”.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multi-parameter Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD44‐Brilliant Violet 711 (BioLegend, Cat.# 103057, clone: IM7, 1:80), CD8a‐FITC (BioLegend, Cat.# 100706, clone: 53‐6.7, 1:50), CD62L‐PE (BioLegend, Cat.# 104407, clone: MEL‐14, 1:80), CX3CR1‐PE/Cyanine 7 (BioLegend, Cat.# 149015, clone: SA011F11, 1:1333), CD107b‐Alexa Fluor 647 (BioLegend, Cat.# 108512, clone: M3/84, 1:200), CD3‐APC/Cyanine7 (BioLegend, Cat.# 100222, clone: 17A2, 1:80), and LIVE/DEAD Fixable Yellow Dead Cell Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat.# L34967, 1:7500).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Signaling Pathway Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AA (ab120916), thapsigargin (ab120286), ORAI3 Ab (ab115558), and NUR77 Ab (ab109180) were purchased from Abcam. Abs recognizing p-CAMKII (Thr286, #12716), p-ERK (Thr202/Tyr204, #4377s), CAMKII (#4436), ERK (#4695), Myb (#12319), AP-2a (#3208), and IKAROS (#9034s) were from Cell Signaling. Abs to β-actin (#A5441) were obtained from Sigma, to p-CD3ζ (Y142) from BD Biosciences (558402) and to CD3ζ from BioLegend (644102). Abs for flow cytometry were purchased from BD Biosciences [CD4-V450 (560345), CD8-PE-Cy7 (557746), CD45RA-AF700 (560673), CD69-Percp-Cy5.5 (560738), p-ERK (Thr202/Try204)-AF670 (561992), and p-SLP76 (Y128)-AF647 (558438)] or BioLegend [CD62L-PE (304806), IKAROS-AF647 (368404), and CD3-AF488 (30045)]. The LIVE/DEADTM Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain Kit from Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific was used to gate out dead cells; Fluo-8 (21080) and Fura RedTM (F3021) for staining cytoplasmic Ca2+ was from AAT Bioquest, Inc., and Thermo Fisher Scientific, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometry Analysis of CAR T Cell Phenotype

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression of EGFR and other proteins on the tumor cell surface was detected by flow cytometry using the anti-EGFR antibody (BD, San Jose, CA, USA). In brief, the CAR T cells were collected from culture and assayed with monoclonal antibodies against human CD25-PC5 and CD69-PC5 (Beckman Coulter Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA), CD3-PE-CY5, CD4-PE, CD8-FITC, CD45RO-PE-CY5, CD62L-PE, TIM3-PE, and LAG3-Alexa Fluor 647 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and CCR7-FITC, CD107α-PE-CY5, and PD-1-PE (BD, San Jose, CA, USA) according to a previous study40 (link) or the manufacturers’ instructions.
EGFR-modified CAR expression was detected by using an indirect method with biotinylated EGFR protein and streptavidin-coupled PE antibody (BD). Fluorescence was assessed using a Beckman Coulter Gallios™ flow cytometer, and the data were analyzed with the FlowJo vX.0.7 and Kaluza v1.5 software (Beckman Coulter Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Splenic T Cell Subsets by FACS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For splenic T cell sorting, magnetic bead-mediated positively selected CD4+ cells were stained with combinations of antibodies (0.5μg/mL per) to CD62L-PE (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) or CD62L-BB515 (BD Bioscience), CD44-APC (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), CD45Rb-APC/Cy7 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), CD124 (1μg/mL, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), and CD25-BV421 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). For Tregs, FoxP3-RFP reporter signal was used for FACS. Cells were washed twice in MACS buffer (Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego, CA) before sterile cell sorting using a FACSAria (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) with the support of the Cytometry & Imaging Microscopy Core Facility of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center. Analysis of all FACS data was performed using FlowJo v10 (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Tumor Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dissociation of fresh tumor samples and antibody staining was performed as described previously40 (link). Cells were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 FC block (Biolegend, 1:100) for 10 min on ice and stained with Zombie Aqua Fixable Viability Kit (Biolegend, 1:500) to discriminate live and dead cells. The following antibody cocktails were used: CD4 BUV805 (BD, 1:100), CD3εBUV395 (BD, 1:20), CD8a BV785 (Biolegend, 1:100), CD25 BV650 (Biolegend, 1:50), TCRγ/δ BV421 (Biolegend, 1:100), CD62L PE (Biolegend, 1:500), CD44 APC-Fire (Biolegend, 1:30), CD45 PerCP Cy5.5 (Biolegend, 1:100), CD19 FITC (Biolegend, 1:100), EpCAM APC/AF647 (Biolegend, 1:200) for acquisition of adaptive immune cells; CD11c BUV737 (BD, 1:30), NK1.1 BUV395 (BD, 1:25), Ly6C BV785 (Biolegend, 1:200), CD11b BV650 (Biolegend, 1:100), F4/80 BV421/PB (Biolegend, 1:30), CD45 PerCP Cy5.5 (Biolegend, 1:100), Ly6G PE (Biolegend, 1:200), CD68 APC-CY7 (Biolegend, 1:20), EpCAM APC/AF647 (Biolegend, 1:200) for acquisition of innate immune cells. 1 × 106  events were acquired per antibody panel on the BD LSRFortessa. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo software (v10.6.2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Characterization of Naive CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For naive CD4 T cell selection, magnetically selected CD4-enriched splenocytes were labeled with CD25-FITC, CD62L-PE, and CD4-PerCP/Cy5.5 antibodies (BioLegend). The cells were then subjected to cell sorting (FACSAria) to obtain CD4+CD62L+CD25 naive T cells. A cell purity of more than 95% was routinely achieved. For cytokine staining, activated T cells were re-stimulated with PMA (50 ng ml−1) and ionomycin (1 μM) for 4 h and then stained using the Fixation and Permeabilization Solution Kit with BD GolgiStop (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). For transcription factor staining, the cells were stained with an anti-Foxp3 antibody (eBioscience, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using the Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience). Occasionally, the FOXP3 Fix/Perm Buffer Set (BioLegend) was used to stain GFP-expressing cells. The cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phenotyping and Transgene Detection of CAR-T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect phenotype and subset, CAR-T cells were stained with mouse anti-human CD4 Percp, CD8 PE, CD62L PE, CCR7 Percp and CD45RO PE/Cy7 on day 7 (Biolegend). To determine CAR transgene, Alexa 647-labeled F(ab)2 fragment of Goat anti-Mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch) was utilized. All samples were analyzed with canto II (BD Biosciences), and data were processed by FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All blood and processed brain hemi samples were stained using anti-mouse recombinant antibodies: Ly6G BV421 (Biolegend, Clone 1A8), CD45 APC (Biolegend, Clone 30-F11), CD62L PE (Biolegend, Clone MEL-14), and CD11b (Biolegend, Clone M1/70) along with a fixable live/dead stain (Invitrogen L34988). Stained samples were fixed with a 1x fixation buffer (Biolegend 420801) and CountBright beads (Invitrogen C36950) were added prior to data acquisition. Fluorescence data was collected by flow cytometry on a Sony SH800S cell sorter. FlowJo (version 10.9.0, BD Biosciences) was used to analyze the data. Cells were gated based on antibody markers and/or scatter. Absolute neutrophil frequencies were calculated for peripheral blood based on the percentage of CountBright beads collected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

T Cell Phenotyping After EF Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For T cell differentiation experiments, T cells were stained 3 days after EF stimulation with anti-human CD45RO-FITC (Immunotools) and CD62L-PE (BioLegend), and the corresponding controls. T cells were washed out of the channel slides, cells were resuspended in 50 μL FACS buffer and incubated with antibodies for 30 min on ice, in the dark. After washing cells with FACS buffer, cells were gated with SSC-A vs. FSC-A for living cells and analyzed for FITC and PE fluorescence by flow cytometry. Quadrants were defined by positive and negative/control PE and FITC signals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!