The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using ab51023

1

Evaluation of Oxidative Stress Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Levels of SIRT2, FPN1, GPX4 and ACSL4 proteins were detected by western blotting. Protein lysates were prepared from the spinal cord (L4-6). Subsequently, 48 μg protein samples were separated using a 12% gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (pore size of 0.45 μm) membrane (Bio-Rad). The membranes were blocked in non-fatty dry milk for 2 h at 37°C and then incubated with primary antibodies, including anti-SIRT2 (1:500, ab51023, Abcam), anti-FPN1 (1:1,000, NBP1-21502, Novus), anti-NRF2 (1:1,000, ab137550, Abcam), anti-GPX4 (1:5,000, ab125066, Abcam), anti-ACSL4 (1:10,000, ab155282, Abcam), and anti-GAPDH (1:10,000, 60004-1-Ig, Proteintech) antibodies at 4°C overnight, and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. We analyzed the density of protein bands using the NIHA ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blotting Analysis of Epigenetic Regulators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein expression was visualized by western blotting, in which electrophoresis and transfer were performed as previously described (16 (link)). Membranes were then incubated with primary antibodies against SIRT1 (07-131, Millipore), SIRT2 (ab51023, Abcam), NF-κB p65 (sc-372, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, TX, USA), p65K310ac (ab19840, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), DNMT1 (NB100-56519, Novus), DNMT3A (3598, Cell Signaling), DNMT3B (sc-20704, Santa Cruz) and β-Actin (ab6276; Abcam). HRP-conjugated mouse and rabbit secondary antibodies were from Thermo Fisher (Massachusetts, USA) and Abcam respectively. Membranes were developed by Amersham™ ECL™ Western Blotting Detection Reagents (GE Healthcare, Illinois, USA) and signals were detected by Amersham™ Imager 600 (GE Healthcare). Band intensities were quantified using the Fiji Software, and relative protein expression was calculated by normalizing against β-Actin expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Spinal Cord SIRT2 and FPN1 Immunostaining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats were perfused transcardially with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the spinal cord (L4-6) tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. After 24 h, the fluid was changed to 20% sucrose in 0.1 M PBS, and then the fluid was changed to 30% sucrose in 0.1 M PBS for 24 h to achieve extensive dehydration. The spinal cord specimens with a thickness of 14 μm were prepared by a freezing microtome (Leica, Germany). After blocking with 5% non-fatty dry milk for 1 h at room temperature, the sections were incubated with primary to rabbit anti-SIRT2 (1: 400, ab51023, Abcam) or rabbit anti-FPN1 (1:500, NBP1-21502, Novus), and either mouse anti-NeuN antibody (a neuronal marker, 1:400, ab104224, Abcam) or mouse anti-CD11b (1:400,CD11b, 1:400, MCA275R, BIO-RAD) overnight at 4°C, followed by the administration of Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:2,000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States), and goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) CY3-conjugated antibody (1:400, S0011, Affinity Bioscience, Jiangsu, China). The double-stained sections were captured by a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay for Epigenetic Regulators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Co-IP assays were performed using M-CSF macrophages differentiated from CD14+ monocytes for 5 days. Cell extracts were prepared in lysis buffer [50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton-X-100, protease inhibitor cocktail (cOmplete™, Merck)] with corresponding units of Benzonase (Sigma) and incubated at 4°C for 4 h. 50 μl of supernatant was saved as input and diluted with 2× Laemmli sample buffer (4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 120 mM Tris–HCl, pH 6.8). Supernatant was first incubated with PureProteome™ Protein A/G Mix Magnetic Beads (Millipore) for 1 h to remove background signal. Samples then incubated overnight at 4°C with corresponding antibodies against DNMT1 (NB100-56519, Novus), DNMT3A (3598, Cell Signaling), DNMT3B (sc-20704, Santa Cruz), SIRT1 (07-131, Millipore), and SIRT2 (ab51023, Abcam) according to the specifications of each antibody. Negative controls were incubated with rabbit (12-370; Merck Millipore) and mouse (12-371; Merck Millipore) IgGs. Subsequently, samples were incubated with magnetic beads at 4°C for 2 h, and beads were then washed three times with lysis buffer. For sample elution, 100 μl of 1× Laemmli sample buffer was added to beads. Samples and inputs were denatured at 95°C in the presence of 1% β-mercaptoethanol. Whole-cell extracts and IP samples were visualized by western blotting, as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ChIP Assay for Histone Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assays were performed as previously described (16 (link)). Briefly, MOs, DMSO- and cambinol-treated day 5 and LPS-stimulated MACs were crosslinked with 1% methanol-free formaldehyde (Thermo Fisher) for 15 min and subjected to immunoprecipitation after sonication. ChIP experiments were performed using the LowCell# ChIP kit™ protein A (Diagenode, Liège, Belgium). We used antibodies against acetylated lysine 16 of histone H4 (H4K16ac; 07-329, Millipore), monomethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4me1; ab8895, Abcam), trimethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4me3; CS200580, Millipore), acetylated lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27ac; 07-360 Millipore), SIRT1 (07-131, Millipore), SIRT2 (ab51023, Abcam), PU.1 (PA5-17505, Invitrogen) and DNMT3B (sc-20704, Santa Cruz). Corresponding rabbit IgG (Diagenode) is used as control. Protein binding was analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR, and data are represented as ratio of the enriched fraction with respect to input. ChIP primers were designed for the areas flanking differentially methylated CpGs and their sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Co-immunoprecipitation of SIRT2 Interactors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed using weak lysate (#P0013D; Beyotime) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (#04906845001; Roche). The Co‐IP analysis was carried out as described previously using the corresponding Ab.16 (link) The Abs used in this study included anti‐SIRT2 Ab (ab51023; Abcam), anti‐G6PD Ab (sc‐373886; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti‐acetyl lysine Ab (ab190479; Abcam), anti‐ubiquitin Ab (ab7780; Abcam), anti‐ubiquitin Ab (#3933; Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐ubiquitin Ab (#3933; Cell Signaling Technology), and anti‐SUMO1 Ab (#4930; Cell Signaling Technology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Cell Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All cells and xenograft mouse model tissues were lysed using RIPA lysis buffer (#R0010; Solarbio) containing protease inhibitors (#P0100; Solarbio). Western blot analysis was carried out as described previously.20
The Abs used in the study included anti‐G6PD Ab (ab133525; Abcam), anti‐SIRT2 Ab (ab51023; Abcam), anti‐CDK4 Ab (11026‐1‐AP; Proteintech), anti‐cyclin D1 Ab (60186‐1‐Ig; Proteintech), anti‐CDK2 Ab (10122‐1‐AP; Proteintech), anti‐cyclin E1 Ab (11554‐1‐AP; Proteintech), anti‐Bax Ab (50599‐2‐Ig; Proteintech), anti‐Bcl2 Ab (12789‐1‐AP; Proteintech), anti‐GAPDH Ab (bs‐2188R; Bioss), anti‐β‐actin Ab (bs‐0061R; Bioss), anti‐rabbit IgG (111‐035‐003; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), and anti‐mouse IgG Ab (115‐035‐003; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!