Several instruments were employed to characterize the PVD-AgNPs [27 (link)]. The morphological features of PVD-AgNPs were thoroughly investigated using field emission transmission electron microscopy (FETEM; JEM-F200, JEOL, Japan). The FTIR (JASCO FT-4100, Tokyo, Japan) provided a remarkable degree of resolution to characterize the surface chemistry of PVD-AgNPs with a range of frequency (4000 to 400 cm−1). The particle distribution and the size were carried out by dynamic light scattering using a particle analyzer (Litesizer 500, Anton Paar, German). The zeta potential of the NPs, which provides surface charge dynamics, was also analyzed using the same particle analyzer. The existence of the Ag metal in the synthesized NP matrix was carried out using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS; VEGA II LSU, TESCAN, Czech). The XRD (Ultima IV, Rigaku, Japan) was used to analyze the crystalline nature and elemental composition of PVD-AgNPs.
Ft 4100
Manufactured by Jasco
Sourced in Japan
The FT-4100 is a Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer. It is a laboratory instrument used to analyze the composition of samples by measuring their infrared absorption or transmission characteristics.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
Jem f200, by JEOL (5 mentions)
Litesizer 500, by Anton Paar (5 mentions)
X ray diffractometer, by Rigaku (3 mentions)
Ultima 4, by Rigaku (2 mentions)
Microplate reader, by Agilent Technologies (2 mentions)
Vega 2 lsu, by TESCAN (1 mentions)
Microtiter plate reader, by Agilent Technologies (1 mentions)
X pert mpd pw 3050 diffractometer, by Philips (1 mentions)
Jem 2100f, by JEOL (1 mentions)
Jsm 6490lv, by JEOL (1 mentions)
X pert mpd, by Philips (1 mentions)
7 protocols using ft 4100
1
Comprehensive Characterization of PVD-AgNPs
2
Synthesis and Characterization of β-Caryophyllene-Capped Gold Nanoparticles
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The synthesis of β-c-AuNPs was carried out exactly as described previously [50 (link)]. In brief, the reaction was carried out in a volume of 200 mL of deionized water by first dissolving 1 mM of HAuCl4.3H2O (pH 9.0) and stirring at 60 °C. A drop-wise solution of β-caryophyllene (1 mM) was added to the reaction mixture and stirred continuously at 60 °C. During the reaction, the color of the liquid changed from yellow to a deep wine-red. Furthermore, the nanoparticle synthesis was confirmed by measuring the UV-visible absorption spectra using a microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) with the scanned absorption spectra ranging from 200 to 700 nm. A Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, JASCO (FT-4100), Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure the ionic interaction in β-c-AuNPs. The Litesizer 500 was used to determine the size and zeta potential of β-c-AuNPs (Anton Paar, GmbH, Graz, Austria). An XRD (X-Ray Diffractometer, Rigaku (Japan), Ultima IV) was used to determine the crystalline nature of β-c-AuNPs.
3
Comprehensive Characterization of Synthesized AuNPs and AgNPs
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The detailed characterization of synthesized AuNPs and AgNPs was
carried out in line with the previously described procedures.67 (link) The initial characterization of these NPs was
performed by scanning UV–vis absorption spectra from 200 to
700 nm with a microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) to check
for a specific absorption peak. FETEM (JEM-F200, JEOL, Japan) was
used to examine the shape and morphology of these nanoparticles. The
ionic interaction in the synthesized NPs was verified by scanning
the spectra with FTIR (JASCO (FT-4100), Tokyo, Japan). The frequencies
used in the FTIR ranged from 400 to 4000 cm–1. Using
a particle analyzer, the Litesizer 500 (Anton Paar, GmbH), the average
size and zeta potential of AuNPs and AgNPs were determined. The elemental
mapping and EDS of these NPs were performed on the same FE-TEM device
that was used to check the morphology. The XRD (Rigaku (Japan), Ultima
IV) equipment was employed to determine the crystalline nature of
C1-AuNPs and C1-AgNPs.
carried out in line with the previously described procedures.67 (link) The initial characterization of these NPs was
performed by scanning UV–vis absorption spectra from 200 to
700 nm with a microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) to check
for a specific absorption peak. FETEM (JEM-F200, JEOL, Japan) was
used to examine the shape and morphology of these nanoparticles. The
ionic interaction in the synthesized NPs was verified by scanning
the spectra with FTIR (JASCO (FT-4100), Tokyo, Japan). The frequencies
used in the FTIR ranged from 400 to 4000 cm–1. Using
a particle analyzer, the Litesizer 500 (Anton Paar, GmbH), the average
size and zeta potential of AuNPs and AgNPs were determined. The elemental
mapping and EDS of these NPs were performed on the same FE-TEM device
that was used to check the morphology. The XRD (Rigaku (Japan), Ultima
IV) equipment was employed to determine the crystalline nature of
C1-AuNPs and C1-AgNPs.
4
Comprehensive Characterization of Fu-AuNPs
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The physiochemical characterization of the Fu–AuNPs was carried out using different instruments, as reported earlier [29 (link)]. To determine the shape of Fu–AuNPs, map their elements, and measure the SAED (selected area electron diffraction), field emission transmission electron microscopy (FETEM; JEM-F200, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was used. A Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, JASCO (FT-4100), Tokyo, Japan) was used to identify the characteristics of functional groups in Fu–AuNPs, with a wavenumber ranging from 400 to 4000 cm−1. A Litesizer 500 (Anton Paar, GmbH, Graz, Austria) was used for the size and zeta potential determination of Fu–AuNPs. An X-Ray Diffractometer (XRD; X-Ray Diffractometer, Rigaku (Japan), Ultima IV) was used to analyze the crystalline nature of the AuNPs.
5
Comprehensive Characterization of UA-Chitosan Nanoparticles
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The detailed characterization of the newly prepared UA-CS NPs was carried out using different instrumentations and the procedures as described earlier [82 (link),83 (link)]. The UV-visible-absorption spectroscopy was carried out by scanning over wavelength ranging from 200 to 800 nm using a microtiter plate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). The morphology of UA-CS NPs was determined using field emission transmission electron microscopy (FETEM; JEM-2100F, JEOL, Japan). The particle size of CS NPs (loaded or unloaded with UA) and size distribution were determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using electrophoretic light scattering spectrophotometer (ELS-8000, OTSUKA Electronics Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan). Similarly, the zeta potential of UA-CS NPs was measured using the electrophoretic light scattering spectrophotometer (ELS-8000; Otsuka Electronics Co. Ltd., Japan). Finally, the Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, JASCO (FT-4100), Tokyo, Japan) analysis of UA-CS NPs was also performed at different frequencies ranging from 400 to 4000 cm−1 using 16 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1. The X-ray diffraction patterns of the prepared CS NPs (loaded or unloaded with UA) were carried out using an X’Pert-MPD PW 3050 diffractometer (Phillips, Almelo, The Netherlands).
6
Characterization of Lam-AuNPs
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Different other instruments such as Fourier transform infrared spectrometer [FTIR; JASCO (FT-4100), Tokyo, Japan], field emission transmission electron microscopy (FE-TEM; JEM-F200, JEOL, Japan), and X-Ray Diffractometer [XRD; X-Ray Diffractometer, Rigaku (Japan), Ultima IV] were used to determine the surface chemistry, morphology, and crystalline nature of Lam-AuNPs. A particle analyzer (Litesizer 500; Anton Paar, GmbH) was used to measure Lam-AuNP size and zeta potential. The same FE-TEM apparatus was used to analyze Lam-AuNPs energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS).
7
Characterization of HA/Gelatin Scaffolds
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The chemical structure and composition of the HA powder and fabricated HA/gelatin composite scaffolds were analyzed by XRD (X’Pert-MPD, Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands), FTIR spectroscopy (FT-4100, Jasco, Tokyo, Japan), and XPS (AXIS Supra, Kratos, UK). The morphologies of the HA powder and HA/gelatin composite scaffolds were inspected by field-emission TEM (JEM-F200, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and low-vacuum SEM (JSM-6490LV, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!