The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using desk 5 sputter system

1

Characterization of PLGA Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Size and Zeta Potential Measurements: aNP size and zeta potential were measured using Zetasizer Nano: Malvern Zen 3600 Zetasizer. 0.1 mg of particles were added to 1 mL of filtered Millipore water, allowed to swell for 6 hours, and then measured. BSA loading: Amount of BSA per mg of aNP was measured using the Micro BSA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher). Briefly, nanoparticles were suspended in Millipore water at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL and added to an equal volume of working solution. After 2 hours of incubation at 37˚C, the suspension was centrifuged, and the supernatant removed for analysis. For the analysis, BSA-coated PLGA nanoparticles were compared to blank uncoated PLGA nanoparticles, and BSA-coated Nile Red-loaded PLGA nanoparticles were compared to Nile Red-loaded uncoated PLGA nanoparticles as some of the Nile Red was released from the nanoparticles during the incubation period. SEM: Vacuum dried nanoparticles were coated with 10 nm of gold using the Denton Desk V Sputter system. Particles were imaged with FEI Quanta 400 ESEM FEG using 10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Lyophilized Peptide Hydrogel Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lyophilized
peptide was dissolved in Milli-Q water
to make a 2% by weight solution. A total of 125 μL of this solution
was mixed with 125 μL of 2× Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered
saline (DPBS; Life Technologies) to form a 1% by weight hydrogel.
The 100 μL aliquots of the resulting hydrogel were allowed to
sit overnight at 4 °C. The samples were then dehydrated using
a 30% ethanol to 100% ethanol gradient over a 9 h time period. The
dehydrated hydrogels were then critical point dried using a critical
point drier (Electron Microscopy Sciences EMS 850). The dried samples
were attached to SEM pucks using conductive carbon tape and sputter
coated with 7–8 nm of gold using a Denton Desk V Sputter system.
All samples were imaged using a JEOL 6500F scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of PLGA Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Size and Zeta Potential Measurements: aNP size and zeta potential were measured using Zetasizer Nano: Malvern Zen 3600 Zetasizer. 0.1 mg of particles were added to 1 mL of filtered Millipore water, allowed to swell for 6 hours, and then measured. BSA loading: Amount of BSA per mg of aNP was measured using the Micro BSA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher). Briefly, nanoparticles were suspended in Millipore water at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL and added to an equal volume of working solution. After 2 hours of incubation at 37˚C, the suspension was centrifuged, and the supernatant removed for analysis. For the analysis, BSA-coated PLGA nanoparticles were compared to blank uncoated PLGA nanoparticles, and BSA-coated Nile Red-loaded PLGA nanoparticles were compared to Nile Red-loaded uncoated PLGA nanoparticles as some of the Nile Red was released from the nanoparticles during the incubation period. SEM: Vacuum dried nanoparticles were coated with 10 nm of gold using the Denton Desk V Sputter system. Particles were imaged with FEI Quanta 400 ESEM FEG using 10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SEM Characterization of Peptide Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM characterization, 1% by weight peptide hydrogel was prepared as previously described. Hydrogel was dehydrated with a series of ethanol from 30% to 100% and the ethanol was removed by critical point drying using an EMS 850 critical point dryer (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Dried samples were mounted into SEM pucks with conductive carbon tape and coated with 4 nm of gold using a Denton Desk V Sputter system (Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, NJ). Samples were imaged using a JEOL 6500F Scanning Electron Microscope (JEOL, USA Inc., Peabody, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Peptide Hydrogel Dehydration and SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptide hydrogels were prepared as described in section 2.1.5, then dehydrated with a series of ethanol treatment from 30% to 100%. Ethanol was removed by critical point drying using an EMS 850 critical point dryer (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Dried samples were mounted into SEM pucks with the aid of conductive carbon tape and coated with 4-5 nm of gold using a Denton Desk V Sputter system (Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, NJ). Samples were imaged using a JEOL 6500F Scanning Electron Microscope (JEOL, USA Inc., Peabody, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were fixed for 24 h with 4% paraformaldehyde and 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS, post-fixed for 45 min with 1% osmium tetraoxide in dH2O, washed and subsequently dehydrated stepwise in ethanol of 25%, 50%, 70%, 95%, 100%, 100% before drying in a critical point dryer (CPD 030, Bal-Tec). Samples were coated with gold-palladium in a Desk V sputter system (Denton Vacuum) and imaged on a field emission scanning electron microscope (Mira3 FE-SEM, Tescan or FE-SEM LEO 1550, Carl Zeiss Inc.). For actin depolymerization studies, cells were treated for 60 min with 10 μM LatA (Cayman Chemical) before fixation, where indicated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscopy of K2 Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM was performed using a Helios NanoLab 660 Scanning Electron Microscope (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR). K2 hydrogel samples were transferred to Porous Spec Pots (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) and subjected to a series of ethanol in Milli-Q water dilutions (30%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 2 x 100%), each for 10 minutes. Samples that also contained cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for 30 minutes prior to the serial dilution process. Next, samples were critical point dried using a Leica EM CPD300 (Leica Biosystems, Deer Park, IL) and coated with 5 nm of gold using a Denton Desk V Sputter System (Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, NJ). Scanning electron micrographs were captured at 1 - 2 kV, 25 pA and were cropped and rotated so the direction of K2 nanofibrillar alignment was horizontal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nanoscale Gel Characterization using SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used to analyze the nano- and microscale features of gels. Samples were dehydrated in a series of ethanol dilutions (30%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 2 × 100%) and then dried in a Leica EM CPD300 Critical Point Dryer (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Next, samples were transferred to a Denton Desk V Sputter System (Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, NJ) and coated with approximately 5 nm of gold. Finally, samples were imaged with a Helios NanoLab 660 Scanning Electron Microscope (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR) at a voltage of 1 kV and current of 25 pA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Peptide Hydrogel Dehydration and SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptide hydrogels were sequentially submerged in ascending concentrations of ethanol solutions to dehydrate the samples. The samples were critically dried using an EMS 850 critical point dryer (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Remaining samples were then fragmented, placed on a conductive carbon taped pucks, and coated with a 4 nm gold layer using a Denton desk V Sputter system (Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, NJ). A JEOL 6500 Scanning Electron Microscope (JEOL Inc., Peabody, MA) was used for imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SEM Sample Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were immersed in a series of ethanol dilutions (30%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 2 × 100%) for 10 minutes each to dehydrate the gels and then dried using a Leica EM CPD300 Critical Point Dryer (Leica Biosystems, Deer Park, IL. Samples were then transferred to a Denton Desk V Sputter System (Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, NJ) and coated with 10 nm of gold. Samples were then imaged on a Helios NanoLab 660 Scanning Electron Microscope (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR) at 1 kV and 25 pA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!