The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

27 protocols using c kit apc

1

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cocultured cells were analyzed by staining with CD45.1 PE, CD45.2 PE, c-Kit APC (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), Sca-1 PE-Cy7, streptavidin APC-Cy7 (BD Pharmingen) and lineage cocktail biotin (a component of StemSep, STEMCELL Technologies). Labeled cells were analyzed using an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multicolor Flow Cytometry of Bone Marrow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis by flow cytometry red blood cell depleted bone marrow cells were stained with one of more of the following: biotin CD3, biotin CD45R/B220 (RA3-6B2), biotin CD11b (M1/70), biotin erythroid marker (TER-119), biotin Ly-6G (RB6-8C5), c-kit APC, sca-1 PE-Cy7 and either CD34 PE or CD49b PE (all eBioscience) in the dark. Bone marrow was washed once and incubated with streptavidin PE-Cy5 for 20 min in the dark. Bone marrow was washed twice and analysed using flow cytometry on a Becton Dickinson LSR II. All samples analysed were gated based on FSC/SSC and GFP+ cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Flow Cytometry Cell Sorting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stained for 30 minutes on ice with antibodies against cKit APC (eBioscience), Sca1 PE (eBioscience), and a FITC lineage cocktail. Cells were sorted using a MoFlow Astrios (Beckman Coulter) sorter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cisplatin Bone Marrow Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult, 8- to 15-week-old mice were injected intravenously with 0.8 mg/kg cisplatin or PBS. After 48 h, the bone marrow was isolated and analyzed as described below. Bone marrow from the femora was flushed out using a 21-gauge syringe with cold PBEA buffer (1 × PBS 0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA and 0.02% sodium azide). The samples were kept on ice. 10 × 106 cells were used per staining. The following antibodies were used: Mouse Lineage Cell Detection Cocktail biotin antibody (1:40) followed by c-kit-APC (Clone 2B8, eBioscience), Streptavidin-APC-Cy7 (Southern Biotech), CD135-PE (Clone A2F10), CD48-PE-Dazzle (Clone HM48-1), 7AAD-PE-Cy5, Sca1-PE-Cy7 (Clone D7), CD34-FITC (Clone RAM34, Invitrogen, 1:100), CD127-BV421 (Clone A7R34), CD150-BV650 (Clone TC15-12F12.2), CD16/32-BV786 (clone 2.4G2, BD Bioscience). All the antibodies for FACS analysis were from Biolegend and used 1:200, unless otherwise specified. All measurements were performed with a BD LSRFortessa cell analyzer (BD Biosciences). Analyses were performed using FlowJo version 10.0.8r1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flk1-bio, TIE2-bio, CD31-bio, c-KIT-APC, VE-CADHERIN-APC, CD41-PE and Streptavidin-PECy7 antibodies were purchased from eBioscience. The stained cells were sorted on ARIA or Influx flow cytometers or analysed on a FACS LSRII (Becton Dickinson). The staining data were analysed using the FlowJo software (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Inhibiting Lysosomal and Proteasomal Degradation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To block lysosomal or proteasomal degradation, MEFs were treated with the proteasomal inhibitors MG132 (10 µM) or the lysosomal inhibitors leupeptin (100 µM) for 4 hr. Cells were lysed in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100 and protease inhibitors. The cell lysates were then subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the indicative antibodies.
To block Notch signaling, WT and Bloc1s2−/− MEFs were incubated with a γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT (25 μM, Sigma, D5942) for 5 hr, and Hes1 expression was detected by qRT-PCR analysis. WT and Bloc1s2−/−neurospheres were treated with DAPT (1 μM) for 72 hr (Hoeck et al., 2010 (link)).
WT and bloc1s2−/− zebrafish embryos at 18 hpf were treated with a γ-secretase inhibitor DBZ (4 μM, Sigma, SML0649), MG132 (10 μM, Sigma, C2211) or chloroquine (50 μM, Sigma, C6628) respectively.
One embryo equivalent (ee) cells in AGM regions were treated with DMSO or DBZ (4 μM; Sigma, SML0649). The cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 with 100% humidity for 4 d. Semi-adherent cells were then carefully harvested and the antibody staining was performed as described previously, using antibodies specific to c-Kit-APC and CD45-PE (eBioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation of Anagen and Telogen Hair Follicle Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For isolation of anagen cells, skins were first incubated in 0.25% collagenase (Sigma) in HBSS (GIBCO) at 37°C for 1–2 hr to digest the dermis. Next, the digested tissues were centrifuged and resuspended in 0.25% Trypsin (GIBCO) and incubated at 37°C for 20 min with gentle shaking. Single-cell suspensions were obtained by pipetting gently and filtering through 70 μm strainers, followed by 40 μm strainers. Staining buffer (PBS with 5% FBS treated with Bio-Rad Chelex to remove calcium) was added to inactivate Trypsin, and cells were collected by centrifugation for 5 min at 300 × g. Cell suspensions were incubated with the appropriate antibodies diluted in staining buffer for 15 min at 4°C. For the isolation of telogen cells, subcutaneous fat was removed from skins with a scalpel. Skins were placed on 0.25% Trypsin at 37°C for 30 min with the dermis side facing down. Skins were then gently scalped from the epidermis to isolate epidermal cells and filtered, centrifuged, and stained as above. The following antibodies were used: CD34–Alexa 660 (eBioscience), α6–phycoerythrin (eBioscience), Sca1–PE-Cy7 (eBioscience), and c-Kit-APC (eBioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunophenotypic Analysis of Hematopoietic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunophenotypic analysis of lineage positive cells, PB, BM and spleen samples were processed with 1× red blood cell lysis buffer, and then incubated with CD11b-PE-cy7 (25–0112-81, eBioscience), Gr1-eFluor450 (48–5931-82, eBioscience), CD3-PE (12–0031-83, eBioscience) and B220-APC (17–0452-82, eBioscience). To distinguish donor from recipient hematopoietic cells, PB were stained with CD45.1-Brilliant Violet 510 (110741, BioLegend), and CD45.2-APC-eFluor780 (47–0454-82, eBioscience) or CD45.2-eFluor450 (48–0454-82, eBioscience). For HSPC analysis, BM cells were washed and incubated for 30min with biotin conjugated lineage markers (CD11b, Gr1, Ter119, CD3, B220, mouse hematopoietic lineage biotin panel (88–7774-75 eBioscience)), followed by staining with streptavidin eFluor780 (47–4317-82, eBioscience), Sea-1-PE (12–5981-82, eBioscience), c-Kit-APC (17–117181, eBioscience), Flk2-PE-Cy5 (15–1351-81, eBioscience), CD150-PE-Cy7 (115914, BioLegend) and CD48-FITC (11–0481-85, Affymetrix) or CD48-eFluor450 (48–0481-80, eBioscience). SLAM-HSC were identified based on expression of LinSca1+c-Kit+CD150+CD48. MPP2, MPP3 and MPP4 were identified based on expression of LinSca_1+c-Kit+Flk2CD150+CD48+, LinSca1+c-Kit+Flk2CD150CD48+ and LinSca1+c-Kit+Flk2+CD150CD48+, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions of thymus, spleen, and bone marrow (BM) were harvested and counted at various time points. Cells from the spleen, and BM were subjected to ACK lysis to remove red blood cells. All flow cytometry specimens were incubated with anti-Fcγ III/II receptor (2.4G2) blocking antibody prior to staining. Samples were labeled using combinations of the following antibodies: CD4, CD8, CD3, CD44, CD25, B220, AA4.1, CD45.2, CD45.1, CD45, Sca-1, c-kit (APC (eBioscience) or PE), and IL7Rα (eBioscience), FLT3 (eBioscience), CCR9 (R&D systems), CD11c, CD31, Gr-1, Ki-67, Bcl-2 (Biolegend), CXCR4 (BD or Biolegend), CD150 (eBioscience), CD47 (Biolegend). For DN and ETP/LSK cells subset determination, mature cells were labeled with biotinylated lineage markers: TER, CD8α, H57, Gr1, Mac1, NK1.1, IgM, CD19, B220, CD3, and CD11c. Biotinylated antibodies were developed with streptavidan pacific blue (Invitrogen). All antibodies were purchased from BD unless indicated otherwise. Isotype controls were utilized for all rare populations, including florescence minus one controls. Four, five, and six color panels were acquired on a LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). All data was analyzed using FlowJo software (Treestar Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Etv2-Gata2 Overexpression in Embryonic Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HA-tagged Etv2 overexpression embryonic stem cell (ESC) lines were generated in our laboratory and have been described previously (Koyano-Nakagawa et al., 2012 (link)). Murine Gata2 coding region was subcloned into the p2Lox vector and then electroporated into A2Lox Cre mES cells to generate the Gata2 overexpressing ES cell line (Iacovino et al., 2011 (link)). The murine Etv2 gene and the murine Gata2 gene were linked through the viral 2A peptide sequence to engineer the Etv2-Gata2 construct, which was utilized to establish the Etv2-Gata2 overexpression ES cell line. ES cell maintenance, embryoid body (EB) differentiation and immunostaining of EBs were performed as described previously (Chan et al., 2013 (link); Rasmussen et al., 2013 (link)). FACS analysis was performed on a BD FACSAria (BD Biosciences). The antibodies used for FACS include: c-Kit-APC (eBiosciences 12-5986), CD31-PE (BD Pharmingen 553373), CD41-PE (BD Pharmingen 558040), Flk1-APC (eBiosciences 17-5821) and Tie2-PE (eBiosciences 12-5987).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!