The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Respironics v60

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in Sweden

The Respironics V60 is a ventilator designed to assist with respiratory support. It provides noninvasive ventilation and can be used for a variety of patient populations. The device offers adjustable settings to meet the needs of the patient.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using respironics v60

1

Ventilator management during resource scarcity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Due to the resource scarcity the patients were supported by several types of ventilators including the Puritan Bennet 840® (Medtronic, Minneapolis MN), the Dräger Evita V500® (Draeger Inc. Telford PA), the Maquet Servo-i® (Getinge LLC, Wayne NJ), the Respironics V60®, the Phillips EVO Trilogy (both Koninklijke Philips N.V.), and the LTV 1000® (Vyaire, Mettawa IL). Standard principles of protective ventilation strategies including the limitation of plateau airway pressures to < 30 cm H2O and tidal volumes of 6–8 cc/kg ideal body weight guided therapy. Moderate hypercapnia was tolerated provided the pH was > 7.20.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

High-flow Nasal Cannula and Non-invasive Ventilation in Respiratory Distress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HFNC device (Airvo-2; Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) consisted of a flow generator (up to 60 L/min), an air–oxygen blender that allows for adjustment of FiO2 from 21 to 100%, and an auto-fill MR 290 heated chamber. The gas mixture at 34–37 °C was delivered via a single-limb heated breathing tube to the patient via the Optiflow™ nasal cannula (Fisher & Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand). The dedicated NIV machine (BIPAP Vivo 40; Breas Medical AB, Mölnlycke, Sweden or Respironics V60; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) was applied via an oronasal mask and was connected to an active humidification system (VH2000, VADI Medical Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan). An appropriately sized oronasal mask was chosen to minimize leaks and to optimize patient comfort. The NIV settings, including inspiratory positive airway pressure, expiratory positive airway pressure, respiratory rate, and FiO2, were clinically adjusted by an attending physician and not modified during the study period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hemodynamic Response to Non-Invasive Ventilation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One week before the start of aerobic training, each subject underwent measurements of SV, CO, arterial blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) during NPPV at pressure levels of 0, 4, 8, 12 cmH2O in the supine position. The above parameters were recorded 5 minutes after steady-state breathing at the selected NPPV level. Artificial ventilation (Respironics V60; Philips, Amsterdam, Holland) was used in all subjects with a nasal mask, and the ventilator mode was set to continues positive airway pressure (CPAP) throughout the study. CO and SV were measured by the impedance method (Noninvasive Continuous Cardiac Output Monitor MCO-101; Medisens, Tokyo). HR was obtained from the R-R interval of the electrocardiogram (Stress Test System ML-9000; Fukuda Denshi, Tokyo) and BP was measured manually by a sphygmomanometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Noninvasive BiPAP Oxygen Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The oxygen delivery methods practiced in this study included the following specifications:BiPAP: Full-Face Mask was used to deliver 21% of O2 and 30 L/min of air flow through BPAP ventilator to test subjects. Respironics V60 by Philips provided a non-invasive bilevel positive airway pressure breathing support. Amara Full-Face Mask by Philips was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparison of Oxygen Delivery Modalities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Room air, 4 L/min nonhumidified NC, 15 L/min nonhumidified FM, HFNC at 10 L/min, HFNC at 30 L/min, HFNC at 50 L/min, NIPPV with an inspiratory positive airway pressure/expiratory positive airway pressure of 12/5 and 20/10 cm H2O. The FM was an OxyMask. The HFNC system was heated and humidified (MR850; Fisher and Paykel) with an FiO2 of 30% (3600 air/gas blender; Sechrist). NIPPV was administered with a Philips Respironics V60 at 30% FiO2 with a vented oral–nasal mask (AF541; Respironics). A nonhumidified NIPPV circuit was used (BiPap Vision; Respironics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!