Wing size was estimated by its centroid size [40 ]. Wing size difference among species was analysed using Kruskal-Wallis H-test, followed by Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction applied for the significance level (0.05). Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS V.17.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).
Spss v 17.0 software for windows
Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States
SPSS v.17.0 is a statistical software package for Windows. It is designed to perform advanced data analysis, manipulation, and presentation. The software provides a wide range of tools for descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and multivariate techniques.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
5 protocols using spss v 17.0 software for windows
1
Wing Size Comparison Across Species
2
Comparison of Arm and Leg Aerobic Capacity
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
All variables were shown to exhibit a normal distribution using the Shapiro Wilk's test. Descriptive values are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD). The differences between pre- and post-training and between the arms and legs were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA. Pair-wise comparisons at specific time-points were adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Holm-Bonferroni procedure. The relative changes in VO2peak in the arms and legs were compared using a t-test. Associations between variables were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient and the variables that predicted time-trial performance identified by stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. All of these analyses were performed in the SPSS v.17.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
3
Factors Predicting HHV-8 Seropositivity
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Differences in the mean values of continuous variables between two groups of patients were analyzed by the t-test. A χ2 or Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the significance of between-group differences in categorical variables. The comparison of anti-HHV-8 titers in plasma between two groups was analyzed by the Mann–Whitney test. Univariate logistic regression was used for analysis of the possible factors predicting the HHV-8 seropositivity in Child–Pugh class A cirrhotics. All variables were entered into stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v. 17.0 software for Windows (Chicago, IL, USA).
4
Arterial Stiffness and Medial Arterial Calcification
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Data obtained from the subjects were entered into SPSS v. 17.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables were reported as frequency and percentages. After the data were tested for normal distribution, Student’s t test was used to compare the mean values of continuous variables among 2 independent groups. Mean CAVI (M-CAVI) values were compared between the patient and control groups based on the grades of MAC by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and post-hoc analysis methods were applied to identify the source of difference. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to test the correlations between M-CAVI and all groups. The level of statistical significance was determined as P < .05.
5
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
All data were analyzed using the SPSS v.17.0 software for Windows (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Parametric variables were compared via the independent Student t-tests or c 2 tests. All results are reported as means ± SD or percentages. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!