The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using α cellulose

1

Cellulose Pretreatment and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
α-cellulose (Sigma) was dried under vacuum (rota-vapor) for 4 h at 80 °C, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate (EMIMAc) (BASF, Basionics, > 95wt%) was kept under vacuum (Schlenk line) for 4 h at 90 °C. Calcium carbonate (Aldrich) and aluminium oxide (Riedel–de Haen) were kept under vacuum for 6 h at 110 °C to remove the moisture from metal oxides. Ammonium polyphosphate (Chemox Pound, n > 1000) was used as received. HPLC grade methanol, diethyl ether, toluene, ethyl 2-cyanoacrylate (E2CA), trichloro(octadecyl)silane (TOS) from Aldrich and ethanol (VWR Chemicals) were used as received. Dried toluene was used to dissolve the trichloro(octadecyl)silane. Celluclast 1.5 L produced by Tricoderma reesei ATCC 26921, citric acid monohydrate, 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS), sodium hydroxide, sodium potassium tartrate, phenol and sodium metabisulphite were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Bake-o-glide non-stick baking sheets (polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-coated fabric) were purchased from the local vendor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Beetle Flight Response to Cellulose

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We exposed test beetles to either standard medium (10 g) or indigestible α-cellulose medium (10 g) across a range of five temperatures spanning the species’ physiologically active range (20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 °C). After that period, the beetles, alive and dead, were counted inside and outside the flight chamber. Trials were run with 20 replicates at a time [10 with standard medium and 10 with α-cellulose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a single temperature. Flight chambers were randomly positioned within the incubator. This procedure was repeated 5×, once for each temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Preparation of Cellulose Polymorphs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cellulose samples were prepared as pictured in Figure 1.

Different types of crystalline cellulose preparation.

Cellulose Iα (untreated cellulose, UN-C): α-cellulose (sigma) was used without further purification.
Cellulose Iβ (glycerol treated cellulose, GT-C): 0.5 g α-cellulose specimens were inserted in a small glass ampule filled with 5 mL glycerol under nitrogen. The ampule was sealed and heated at 270°C for 1 h. The ampule was then cooled naturally and washed thoroughly with distilled water until it reached neutrality, then lyophilized.
Cellulose II: cellulose II was obtained by two methods.
ST-C (sodium hydroxide treated cellulose): α-cellulose powders were soaked in 16.5% NaOH for 2 h, at 25°C, followed by washing thoroughly with distilled water until neutrality and lyophilization.
IT-C (IL treated cellulose): for the cellulose II samples prepared by IL, α-cellulose was immersed in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([BMIM]Cl) at 90°C for 3 h, followed by washing thoroughly with distilled water and lyophilization.
Cellulose III (ET-C, EDA treated cellulose): cellulose III was prepared by soaking α-cellulose in EDA for 6 h in an ice-water bath. Then the cellulose-amine complex was washed with anhydrous ethanol until it reached neutrality and then lyophilized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Cellulose Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
α-Cellulose, sulfuric acid (H2SO4;
95–98%), nitric acid (70%; HNO3), cellulose acetate
(CA; 30 KDa), H2O2 (30
wt%), 2,9-Dimethyl-1,10-Phenanthroline (DMP) and copper(II) sulfate
were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Sodium hydroxide pellets were purchased
from Merck. Acetone and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were of technical
grade and purchased from VWR. Preparation of simulated sea water was
done according to ASTM standard D6691–17 without the presence
of any microorganisms rendering to average salinity of world sea water.
A phosphate buffer solution (0.1 M) was prepared from K2HPO4 and NaH2PO4 (Sigma-Aldrich)
with pH adjusted to 7.0 by H2SO4 (1 N, VWR)
and NaOH (1 N, VWR). All chemicals were used as-received.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterizing cellulose samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 99.7%, anhydrous), tetrabutylammonium fluoride trihydrate (TBAF, 97%) and bis(ethylenediamine)copper(II) hydroxide solution (CED solution, 1 M in copper, molar ratio of ethylenediamine/copper of 2:1) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). Four different samples of cellulose (one single batch each) have been studied with different average of DP (Table 1). Avicel® (PH-101, Ph Eur, cellulose microcrystalline, batch n°BCBK2051V), α-cellulose (powder, batch n°BCBH3503V) and cotton fibers (cotton linters, medium fibers, batch n°MKBQ8042V) were purchased from Fluka (Sigma Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), and Vitacel® (L600/30, Ph Eur, powdered cellulose, batch n°7120891215 X) from JRS Pharma (Rosenberg, Germany). Pullulan standards P 1720 kDa, P 970 kDa, P 636 kDa, P 318 kDa, P 184 kDa, P 100 kDa, P 45.5 kDa, P 20 kDa, P 9.2 kDa, P 5.9 kDa, P 1.1 Da and P 0.3 Da were purchased from Polymer Standards Service (PSS, Mainz, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Heterologous Expression of Xylanase from Chicken Cecal Metagenome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Escherichia coli EPI300™-T1R clone harboring fosmid pCC1FOS carrying a chicken cecal metagenomic DNA fragment containing a xylanase gene was a gift from Dr Kenneth van Driel. All enzymes and dNTPs in this study were purchased from New England BioLabs Inc., USA, and Promega, USA. Plasmid DNA extraction and purification kit was purchased from GE Healthcare, UK. TALON Superflow Metal Affinity Resin (Clonetech) was purchased from TaKaRa (Otsu, Japan). The expression vector pET-32a (Novagen) was used for cloning and expressing the xylanase. E. coli Tuner (DE3)pLysS was used as expression host and was cultivated on Luria–Bertani medium (Difco). The enzyme substrates used were xylan from oat-spelt (Fluka), xylan from beechwood (Megazyme), α-cellulose (Sigma), carboxymethyl cellulose (Sigma), starch (Sigma), β-glucan from barley (Sigma), 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-xylopyranoside (Megazyme), 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-cellobioside (Sigma), and 4-nitrophenyl-α-D-galactopyranoside (Fluka). Molecular weight standard mix containing xylose, xylobiose, xylotriose, xylotetraose, xylopentaose, and xylohexaose (Megazyme) was the gift from Professor Khanok Ratanakhanokchai, KMUTT, Thailand. All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cellulomonas uda Growth Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The strains used were C. uda (DSM 20108) purchased from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany), and Cellulomonas sp. ATCC 21399 (DSM 20108) obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Virginia, USA). These two strains are identical and should both be referred to as C. uda.
The basal growth medium (referred to as BM) contained (per litre): NaCl, 1.5 g; (NH3)2SO4, 6.2 g; (Na)2HPO4, 9.1 g; KH2PO4, 0.9 g; EDTA, 50 mg; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.2 g; ZnSO4·7H2O, 8 mg; FeSO4·7H2O, 20 mg; MnSO4·H2O, 15 mg; CaCl2·2H2O, 26 mg; MOPS, 41.8 g; and yeast extract, 300 mg. Prior to autoclaving (121 °C for 20 min), the pH was adjusted to 7.4 with 5 M NaOH. Biotin (1 mg l−1) and thiamine (1 mg l−1) were aseptically added to the autoclaved medium from filter-sterilized stock solutions. Cellulosic growth substrates, α-cellulose (Sigma, C-8002) and Avicel (Merck, Microcrystalline, 1.02331.0500), were added prior to autoclaving, whereas the soluble growth substrates, glucose and cellobiose, were added aseptically to the autoclaved medium through a 0.22-µm filter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cellulose-Based Feedstock Utilization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
α-Cellulose as a feedstock was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (KOREA). The activated carbon, nitric acid (HNO3, 70%) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 95–98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([EMIM]Cl, 98%) and 1,3-dimethylimidazolium dimethyl phosphate ([DMIM]DMP, 98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Lactic acid and choline chloride were also provided by Sigma-Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Corncob-based Biorefinery Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Corncobs were obtained domestically (Tainan, Taiwan) and were washed with deionized water. After drying at 105 °C, corncobs were mechanically grinded into particles and sieved through 40 mesh sieves (particle size smaller than 0.49 mm). All chemical reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. Iron (III) chloride, o-phenanthroline, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Aldrich and J.T. Baker, respectively. Glucose and gluconic acid were purchased from Alfa Aesar. Hydrogen peroxide solution (35 wt% in H2O), α-cellulose, and cellulase from Trichoderma reesei were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. S. cerevisiae for fermentation was purchased from Algist Bruggeman.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Biphasic Cellulose Hydrolysis and Monosaccharide Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were conducted with α-cellulose (Sigma Aldrich), D-glucose (Acros Organics) or D-fructose (Acros Organics). The reactions took place in a biphasic reaction medium consisting of an aqueous phase (demineralized water) acidified with HCl (Fisher Scientific, 37%) and an organic phase consisting of MIBK (Acros Organics, 99.5%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!