The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using celigo s

1

Breast Cancer Cell Line Cultivation and Manipulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HCC1806 (ATCC® CRL-2335™), HCC1937 (ATCC® CRL-2336™), MDA-MB-231 (ATCC® HTB-26™), MDA-MB-468 (ATCC® HTB-132™), HCC1954 (ATCC® CRL-2338™) and SKBR3 (ATCC® HTB-30™) cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultivated in RPMI 1640 GlutaMAX (Gibco; HCC1806, HCC1937, HCC1954), DMEM/F12 GlutaMAX (Gibco; SKBR3) or DMEM (Gibco; MDA-MB231, MDA-MB-468), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1% penicillin/streptavidin (Gibco). Reverse siRNA transfections were performed using DharmaFECT 1 (Horizon Discovery) in OptiMEM GlutaMAX (Gibco) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. A list of the siRNAs utilized in this study is provided in Table S1 of Supplementary data. Proliferation kinetics and tumorsphere numbers were recorded using a Celigo® S imaging cytometer (Nexcelom Bioscience LLC). Colony formation assays were stained with crystal violet and scanned with an Epson Perfection V700 Photo. Detailed protocols for siRNA transfection and functional assays can be found in Supplementary data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Cell Viability and Spheroid Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell viability were carried as detailed previously [14 (link)]. In brief, parental cell lines were cultured in DCC medium for 3 day. Cells were seeded into 96 well plates. The following day monolayers were treated with the drug concentrations indicated for 6 days with a medium change on day 3. Viability was measured using TiterGlo according to the manufacturers’ instructions (Promega, UK). Statistical analysis for the drug studies has been performed using Wilcoxon Matched pairs test using Graph-Prism.
Spheroid cultures were generated by seeding 2500 cells per well of a 96 well ultra-low-attachment plate (Costar). Plates were spun at 900 × gave for 10 min. Spheres were formed over 72 h and subsequently treated with the drugs as indicated for 7 days. Proliferation was assessed using Celigo S (Nexcelom Bioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Anti-Cancer Drug Efficacy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stripped of E2 by culture in RMPI1640 containing 10% DCC for 48 h prior to seeding into 96-well tissue culture plates. Monolayers were allowed to acclimatise for 24 h prior to treatment with RPMI1640 + 10% DCC containing increasing concentrations of drugs. The medium was replaced after 3 days, and cells were cultured for a total of 5–6 days. Cell viability was determined using the CellTitre-Glo® Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Values were expressed as % viability relative to the vehicle-treated control. Spheroid cultures were generated by seeding 2500 cells per well of a 96-well ultra-low attachment plate (Costar). Plates were spun at 900×g for 10 min. Spheres were formed over 72 h and subsequently treated with the drugs as indicated for 7 days. Proliferation was assessed using Celigo S (Nexcelom Bioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Imaging Cytometry Workflow for Cellular Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were prepared for imaging cytometry as described above for flow
cytometry but using half-area, black, clear-bottomed 96-well plates (Greiner
CELLSTAR). Each plate of cells was then centrifuged at 500 x g for 5 minutes at
4°C. Cells were imaged in a Nexcelom Celigo S every 20 minutes for 3
hours at room temperature using the “Target 1+Mask” expression
analysis settings. Target 1 was GFP (green channel) and the brightfield image
was used as a mask to segment cells. Exposure time for GFP was 200,000
μs.
The cells were segmented using Celigo’s native brightfield
algorithm for image analysis. The intensity threshold was set to 10, the
precision was set to high, the cell diameter and dilation radius were set to 4
μm and 0 μm, respectively, and the separate touching objects
setting was turned on. The identified cells were then gated based on the mean
intensity and aspect ratio of mCherry fluorescence to exclude debris and clumps
of cells (Figure 5A). Background correction
was used in the analysis of the GFP intensity. For data analysis and
presentation, the mean GFP intensity was averaged across three to four
biological replicates. Dose-response curves were fitted to a nonlinear Boltzmann
function in GraphPad Prism 4 using a least squares regression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell growth inhibition assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5,000 cells were plated on day 0 in a 96-well plate. On day 1, before treatment, each well was imaged and direct cell counting was performed using a Celigo S (Nexcelom) imager and automatic cell counting software provided with the instrument. Compounds were added to final concentrations of 0.15 μM- 20 μM. 48 hours after treatment, wells were re-imaged and counted using the pre-treatment counting procedure. Growth was reported as the fold increase over the baseline measurement and normalized to DMSO controls. Experiments were performed in triplicate, in three separate experiments. EC50 values were calculated by GraphPad Prism 6 using a sigmoidal interpolation model with 95% confidence intervals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!