The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using mpms 7

1

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphologies of the as-prepared samples were obtained on a field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (Hitachi SU-8010), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (HT7700), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) (JEOL JEM-2001F). The crystal structures of the as-prepared samples were analyzed by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) (Empyrean 200,895) using Cu Kα radiation. Chemical structures of the as-prepared samples were measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Escalab250Xi) with Al Kα radiation. Raman spectra were obtained by a LabRAM HR Evolution unit. The metal content in samples was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Vista Axial). The X-ray absorption spectroscopic (XAS) measurements of the as-prepared samples were conducted in Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility and Taiwan Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Quantum Design MPMS-7 superconducting quantum interference device (MPMS-VSM) magnetometer was utilized to obtain the magnetic properties of the as-prepared catalysts. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) data of the as-prepared catalysts were acquired on a Bruker EMXmicro.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Magnetic Properties of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The magnetic properties were measured using a Quantum Design MPMS-7 superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer at temperatures in the range of 1.8–300 K. In a glove box, polycrystalline samples of each material were transferred to NMR tubes and restrained in eicosane. The NMR tubes were then placed under a partial vacuum and flame sealed before being transferred to the magnetometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pressure-Induced Magnetic Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The magnetic properties under pressure were measured using a Cu-Be piston–cylinder clamp cell (Electrolab) in the SQUID magnetometer (Quantum Design, MPMS 7). A Teflon tube inside the cylinder was filled with the powder sample and Daphne 7373 as the pressure medium. Then the cylinder was sealed with a Teflon lid. The background signals were extracted to obtain the magnetic susceptibility data from the material itself. The applied pressures were read from the pressure measurement film (FUJIFILM) for pressures below 100 MPa, while for pressures above 100 MPa, the applied pressures were determined from the superconducting transition temperature of the lead set inside the cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of Iron Oxides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diverse methods were implemented for material characterization, permitting a detailed comparison of the iron oxides before and after the propagation of combustion waves. These included scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) line profile data from a field-emission SEM (FEI, Model Quanta 250 FEG; Jeol, Model JSM-6701F), transmission electron microscope (TEM) images and EDX mapping (FEI, Talos F200 X), Raman spectroscopy (Horiba Jobin Yvon, LabRAM ARAMIS IR2 spectrometer), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns (Rigaku, SmartLab). Raman spectra were measured with a 532-nm diode laser as an excitation source. XRD patterns were measured in the 2θ mode at a scan speed of 2°/min. The magnetic properties were measured through the B–H curve for magnetic flux and magnetic field strength (MPMS–7, Quantum Design, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Superparamagnetic LMWHA-Fe3O4 NPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The superparamagnetic properties of the fabricated LMWHA-Fe3O4 NPs were determined using a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) (MPMS7, Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA). The hysteresis loops of the LMWHA-Fe3O4 NPs were measured at temperatures of 5 K and 300 K. The saturation magnetizations of the oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 NPs and LMWHA-Fe3O4 NPs were also tested and compared.
The dynamic viscosities of the LMWHA and LMWHA-Fe3O4 NPs were measured at 25 °C using a viscometer (X-420, Cannon Instrument Co., State College, PA, USA). As described in a previous study [26 (link)], the samples were added to pure water to form solutions with a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. The solutions were then stirred magnetically for 2 h and the dynamic viscosity was read with units of centistokes (cSt) using DD water as a control.
The thermal stabilities of the oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 NPs, neat LMWHA, and LMWHA-Fe3O4 NPs were measured using a thermogravimeter (TGA, TG 209 F3 Tarsus, Netzsch, Gerätebau GmbH, Bavarian, Germany). An amount of 5 mg of each sample was heated from room temperature to 700 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min in a chamber filled with nitrogen. The decomposition temperatures (Td) and residual weights of the various samples at 700 °C were then measured and compared.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synthesis and Characterization of Doped MgB2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pure MgB2 and (Fe, Ti) particle-doped MgB2 specimens were synthesized using the nonspecial atmosphere synthesis (NAS) method16 . Briefly, NAS method needs Mg (99.9% powder), B (96.6% amorphous powder), (Fe, Ti) particles and stainless steel tube. Mixed Mg and B stoichiometry, and (Fe, Ti) particles were added by weight. They were finely ground and pressed into 10 mm diameter pellets. (Fe, Ti) particles were ball-milled for several days, and average radius of (Fe, Ti) particles was approximately 0.163 μm10 . On the other hand, an 8 m-long stainless-steel (304) tube was cut into 10 cm pieces. Insert holed Fe plate into stainless- steel (304) tube. One side of the 10 cm-long tube was forged and welded. The pellets and pelletized excess Mg were placed at uplayer and downlayer in the stainless-steel tube, respectively. The pellets were annealed at 300 °C for 1 hour to make them hard before inserting them into the stainless-steel tube. The other side of the stainless-steel tube was also forged. High-purity Ar gas was put into the stainless-steel tube, and which was then welded. Specimens had been synthesized at 920 °C for 1 hour. They are cooled in air and quenched in water respectively. The field and temperature dependence of magnetization were measured using a MPMS-7 (Quantum Design).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Magnetometry Measurements Using MPMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetometry measurements were performed using Quantum Design MPMS-7 and MPMS-3 magnetometers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Magnetic Properties of FePt Helices and Janus Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The magnetic properties of wafer pieces with FePt helices (annealed) and Janus particles (as-deposited, annealed, and aged) were characterized via superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID, MPMS-7, quantum design) magnetometry. The field-dependent magnetization measurements were conducted at room temperature and the field was varied from 7 T to -7 T. For the M–H hysteresis loop measurements, the external magnetic field H has been applied in the out-of-plane and the in-plane directions where in-plane denotes a measurement perpendicular to the wafer surface’s normal while out-of-plane is defined as parallel to it. The contribution of the substrate and the SiO2 was subtracted via linear fitting at high field ranges.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Infrared spectra of the samples were recorded using a Vertex70 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The XRD patterns of samples were obtained using a Rigaku D/Max-2550PC diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan), over a diffraction angle (2θ) range of 10–70°, at a scan rate of 4° min−1. SEM images of the nonmagnetic and magnetic samples were taken using an SU8010N and an S-4800 SEM systems (Hitachi, Japan). The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were recorded on a V-Sorb 2800 surface area and porosimetry analyser (Gold APP Instruments Corporation, China). Magnetic characterization was carried out using a magnetic property measurement system (MPMS-7, Quantum Design, USA). zeta potentials of samples in solution were measured by a JS94H zeta potential meter (Powereach, China) at different pH values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Synthesis of (Fe, Ti)-Doped MgB2 Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
(Fe, Ti) particle-doped MgB2 specimens were synthesized using the non-special atmosphere synthesis (NAS) method21 . The starting materials were Mg (99.9% powder) and B (96.6% amorphous powder) and (Fe, Ti) particles. Mixed Mg and B stoichiometry, and (Fe, Ti) particles were added by weight. They were finely ground and pressed into 10 mm diameter pellets. (Fe, Ti) particles were ball-milled for several days, and average radius of (Fe, Ti) particles was about 0.163 μ m. On the other hand, an 8 m-long stainless- steel (304) tube was cut into 10 cm pieces. One side of the 10 cm-long tube was forged and welded. The pellets and excess Mg were placed in the stainless-steel tube. The pellets were annealed at 300 °C for 1 h to make them hard before inserting them into the stainless-steel tube. The other side of the stainless-steel tube was also forged. High-purity Ar gas was put into the stainless-steel tube, and which was then welded. Specimens had been synthesized at 920 °C for 1 hour and cooled in air. Field dependences of magnetization were measured using a MPMS-7 (Quantum Design). During the measurement, sweeping rates of all specimens were made equal for the same flux-penetrating condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!