The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

71 protocols using f4 80 pe

1

Multicolor Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The above isolated cells were blocked with 10 % normal rat serum/PBS on ice for 30 min. The brain mononuclear cells were stained with a combination of anti-mouse antibodies CD206-FITC + MHCII-PE + F4/80-PE/Cy7 + CD45-APC and the splenocytes with a combination of CD11b-FITC + CD45-PE + F4/80-PE/Cy7 + Gr-1-APC or CD206-FITC + MHCII-PE + F4/80-PE/Cy7 + CD45-APC (all from BioLegend) on ice, protected from light, for 30 min. Cells were washed and resuspended in 500 μl PBS/1 % FCS/0.02 % NaN3. The flow cytometric data were acquired with a two-laser, six-color Gallios flow cytometer and analyzed by Kaluza analysis 1.3 software (Beckman Coulter). Brain mononuclear cells were defined as follows: microglia CD45+F4/80+, macrophages CD45hiF4/80+, M1-type macrophages CD45hiF4/80+MHCII+CD206, and M2-type macrophages CD45hiF4/80+MHCII−/+CD206+. Splenocytes were defined as follows: granulocytes CD45+F4/80−/+Gr-1++, monocytes CD45+F4/80Gr-1+, monocyte-derived macrophages CD45+CD11b+F4/80+Gr-1, tissue-resident macrophages CD45+F4/80++Gr-1−/+, M1-type macrophages CD45+F4/80+MHCII+CD206, and M2-type macrophages CD45+F4/80+MHCII−/+CD206+. Cell populations were calculated as percentages among total leukocytes or macrophages.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cardiac Single-Cell Suspension and Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heart single-cell suspension and flow cytometry was prepared as previously described [30 ]. Briefly, hearts were perfused, extracted, finely minced, and then incubated with digestive enzymes at 37 °C on a rocking shaker at 50 rpm for 45–60 min. Samples were homogenized with a 40 μm cell strainer. Red blood cells were lysed using ammonium-chloride-potassium (ACK) lysis buffer. Next, samples were centrifuged at 400× g for 5 min at 4 °C, and the pellet was then suspended with FACS buffer. Cells were immune-stained with the following anti-mouse antibodies: CD45-Alexa Fluor®® 700 (BioLegend, 103128, San Diego, CA, USA), CD11b-PerCP (BioLegend, 101228, CA, USA), F480-PE (BioLegend, 123110, CA, USA), CD206-BV421 (BioLegend, 141717, CA, USA), CD64-APC (BioLegend, 161006, CA, USA), Ly-6G- Brilliant Violet 510™ (BioLegend, 127633, CA, USA), Ly-6C-PE/Cyanine7 (BioLegend, 128018, CA, USA), Propidium iodide (Sigma, 25535-16-4, Darmstadt, Germany). Cells were incubated (30 min, 4 °C) with the antibody mixture in a staining buffer (PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.05% sodium azide) and then washed twice with a staining buffer. Cells were acquired using a LSRFortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The data were analyzed using FlowJo V.10 software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Macrophage Phenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions from pooled quadriceps and TA muscles were generated as previously described.84 The interrogation of live macrophage populations was performed via staining with Zombie NIR viability dye (Cat. #423105; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD11b (PerCP-Cy5, Cat. #101228; BioLegend), F4/80 (PE, Cat. #123110; BioLegend), Siglec-F (BV421, Cat# 56268; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), Ly6C (FITC, Cat. #128006; BioLegend), CD206 (Alexa Fluor 647, Cat. #141711; BioLegend). Cells were analyzed using a BD FACSAria Fusion flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo, version 10; FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma or conditioned media from macrophages were collected and centrifuged at 250×g for 10 min, and the supernatants were stored at −20°C. To obtain the EVs, the supernatant from plasma or conditioned media were (ultra)centrifuged at 100,000×g for 4 h. The pellets were resuspended in annexin V buffer or FACS buffer and were stored at −20°C until use. The EVs were assessed using an Accuri™ C6 Flow Cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) through the evaluation of annexin V (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), F4/80-PE (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), SinglecF-alexa488, LY6G-APC, and CD3-alexa488 (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA)-positive events. The gated region containing the EVs was previously delimited by using known concentrations of 1-µm beads to estimate the precise amount of EVs, as previously described (28 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Stimulation of Innate Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions of splenocytes were obtained by mechanic dissociation of the spleen, while the single-cell suspensions of PECs were obtained following peritoneal lavage. RBC lysis was performed for 5 min for the single-cell suspensions of splenocytes. Cells were subsequently stained with a cocktail of antibodies. The following anti-mouse antibodies were used: CD11b FITC (101206, BioLegend), CD11b PE (101207, BioLegend), CD11c APC (117309, BioLegend), CD19 FITC (115505, BioLegend), F4/80 PE (123109, BioLegend), Ly6G Pacific Blue (127611, BioLegend), NK1.1 FITC (108705, BioLegend), and TCR-β FITC (109205, BioLegend). Splenic CD11b+ innate immune cells were sorted as CD19-TCR-β-NK1.1-Ly6G-CD11b+, while peritoneal macrophages were sorted as F4/80+CD11c-Ly6G-CD11b+ (Supplementary Figure 13). Splenic CD11b+ innate immune cells and peritoneal macrophages were sorted by BD FACSMelody™ (Becton Dickinson) and stimulated with 50 ng/ml LPS for 2 h 45 min at 37°C/5% CO2 followed by RNA isolation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Kidney Immune Cell Profiling in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In different groups, the kidney tissue of the mice was harvested, and the tissue was cut with scissors and digested with collagenase for 1 h. The cells were filtered through a 200-mesh filter, lysed with 3 mL of red blood cell lysis buffer for 5 min, and washed with PBS [13 ]. Cells were labeled for 30 min at 4°С in fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) buffer (PBS containing 2% FBS and 0.02% azide) with manufacturer-recommended concentrations of purified anti-mouse CD45-FITC (1:100, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), F4/80-PE (1:100, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD11b-APC (1:100, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), and Gr-1-PE (1:100, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) for 30 min. Cells incubated with FACS buffer alone were used as negative controls. The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Tumor Angiogenesis and Immune Infiltrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor tissues were isolated on day 28 after tumor inoculation, and the frozen tumor tissues were cut into 10-μm sections and mounted onto glass slides. Sections were fixed and permeabilized with cold acetone and blocked with 10% goat serum. To observe blood vessels and capillaries in tumor tissue, sections were incubated with anti-CD31 antibody (1:200, Sigma Aldrich) overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with the secondary antibody Alexa488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Immune cell density was analyzed by immunostaining; for the staining of immune cells, sections were incubated with respective antibodies, including CD4-PE, CD8-APC, CD19-PE, and F4/80-PE (1:100, BioLegend) after blocking. Images of blood vessels and immune cells were captured using an inverted fluorescence confocal microscope (LSM710, Carl Zeiss). A total of 25 images (5 × 5) of each sample were captured using the Tile scan mode to obtain a large view. The number of the anti-CD4/8, CD19, or F4/80 positive cells were counted over 100 cells from 3 different fields by image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell suspensions were stained with combinations of following monoclonal fluorescently conjugated antibodies: TCRβ eFluor® 450 (H57-597, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), CD4 FITC (GK1.5, eBioscience), CD8a PerCP-Cyanine5.5 (53–6.7, eBioscience), CD25 APC (PC61.5, eBioscience), FoxP3 PE (NRRF-30, eBioscience), CD45R/B220 APC-Cyanine7 (RA3-6B2, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), IgD Brilliant violet 650™ (11-26c.2a, Biolegend), CD11b Alexa Fluor® 700 (M1/70, Biolegend), F4/80 PE (BM8, Biolegend), PD-1 PE-eFluor™ 610 (J43, eBioscience), CTLA-4 PerCP-Cyanine5.5 (UC10-4B9, Biolegend), IL-10 PerCP-Cyanine5.5 (JES5-16E3, Biolegend), LAP PerCP-Cyanine5.5 (TWT-16B4, Biolegend), CD14 FITC (Sa2-8, eBioscience), CD206 APC (MR6F3, eBioscience), MHC-II e Fluor® 450 (M5/114.15.2, eBioscience). To stain for intracellular murine antigens, cells were first stained for surface antigens, then fixed and permeabilized with intracellular fixation and permeabilization buffer kit (eBioscience) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. For intracellular IL-10 staining, cells were incubated with PMA (50 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1000 ng/ml) for 2 h, then incubated with Brefeldin A (10.6 μM) and Monensin (2 μM) for 3 h. Data were acquired using BD Fortessa X20 (BD Bioscences, San Diego, CA, USA) and analyzed with FlowJo 7.6 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell-suspensions of splenocytes and liver leukocytes were stained for cell surface markers using specific fluorophore-conjugated antibodies optimized for flow cytometry. Reagents and antibodies used in this study were LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain (ThermoFisher), CD11b-BUV395 (Clone: M1/70; BD Biosciences), Siglec-F-BUV615 (Clone: E50-2440; BD Biosciences), NK1.1-BUV661 (Clone: PK136; BD Biosciences), B220-BUV737 (Clone: RA3-6B2; BD Biosciences), CD8α-BUV805 (Clone: 53–6.7; BD Biosciences), MHCII(I-A/I-E)-BV510 (Clone: M5/114.15.2; BioLegend), CD4-BV570 (Clone: RM4-5; BioLegend), SCA-1-BV711 (Clone: D7; BioLegend), CD11c-BV785 (Clone: N418; BioLegend), Ly6C-FITC (Clone: HK1.4; BioLegend), Siglec-H-PerCP/Cy5.5 (Clone: 551; BioLegend), F4/80-PE (Clone: BM8; BioLegend), CD3ε-PE/Cy5 (Clone: 145-2C11; ThermoFisher), CD80-PE/Cy7 (Clone: 16-10A1; BioLegend), CD115-AF594 (Clone: AFS98; BioLegend), CCR2-APC (Clone: 475301; R&D Systems), CD45-AF700 (Clone: 30-F11; BioLegend), CD48-APC/Cy7 (Clone: HM48-1; BioLegend), Ly6G-Biotin (Clone: 1A8; BioLegend; with secondary antibody streptavidin-DyLight 800; ThermoFisher). Stained and fixed (4% PFA; 10 min in the dark) cells were analyzed with a Becton Dickson custom 10-laser ‘LSR-II’ flow cytometer and FlowJo software (v.10.4.1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FACS analysis were performed with routine protocols using the FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Immunocytometry Systems), antibodies used for mice spleen lymphocyte staining are as following: CD3-Percp cy5.5, CD4-FITC, APC, CD8-Percp cy5.5, PE, CD19-FITC, B220-PE, CD69-FITC, CD80-FITC, CD86-APC, CD40-PE (Biolegend) and bone marrow staining: F4/80-PE, CD11b-FITC, MHC-II-PerCP cy5.5 (Biolegend). FACS buffer; 1 × PBS (Gibco) + 2% FBS (Sigma). All data were analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!