The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using anti il 9

1

Allergic Airway Inflammation Models

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acute Model: Wild type (WT) and Sfpi1lck−/− mice were sensitized by intraperitoneal injection of OVA (Sigma) adsorbed with alum (Sigma) on days 0 and 7 and subsequently challenged with intranasal OVA for 5 days as described previously (5 (link)). Where specified, mice were given 20 μg control antibody or anti-IL-9 (222622; R&D Systems) intravenously 30 min before the first, third and fifth challenges. Mice were sacrificed 48 h after the final intranasal challenge. Chronic model: WT and Sfpi1lck−/− mice were sensitized by intranasal injection of 40 μg HDM extract (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in phosphate-buffered saline, PBS) from Greer Laboratories (Lenoir, NC) or PBS 3 days per week for 5 weeks. Mice were sacrificed 24 h after the final intranasal challenge. Cells from mediastinal lymph nodes were stimulated with HDM for 5 days, and cytokine production measured by ELISA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Adoptive Transfer of Th2/Th9 Cells and Intranasal Challenge

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, differentiated OVA-specific Th2 or Th9 cells were adoptively transferred intravenously into wild-type recipient mice (33 (link)). Twenty-four hours after cell transfer, mice were challenged intranasally with 100 μg OVA plus 500 ng TSLP for 5 days. Mice were then sacrificed 24 h after the last challenge for further analysis. To neutralize cytokine in recipients of Th2 or Th9 cells, we injected mice via tail vein with anti-IL-9 (10 μg/dose), anti-IL-13 (10 μg/dose), or IgG2b control Ab (10 μg/dose, R&D Systems) on days 1, 3, and 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Inhibitor Procurement and Utilization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Inhibitors were purchased from commercial suppliers as listed below, or were provided (Compound 29, (Patch et al., 2011 (link))) by the Donald McDonnell Laboratory (Duke University). ABT199 (Selleckchem #S8048), ABT263 (Selleckchem #S1001), LCL161 (Selleckchem #S7009), Birinapant (Selleckchem #S7015), Fomepizole (Selleckchem #S1717), CHR2797 (Tocris #3595), XCT790 (Sigma Aldrich #X4753), Topiramate (Selleckchem #S1438), ACET (Tocris #2728), Almorexant (Selleckchem #S2160), SB334867 (R&D Systems, #1960), anti-IL1R1 (R&D Systems, #AF269), anti-IL9 (R&D Systems, #AF209), anti-ITGAV (Abcam, #ab16821), Cilengitide (Selleckchem, #S7077), Guanidine HCl (Sigma Aldrich, #G3272), Dalfampridine (Sigma Aldrich, #275875), BEZ235 (Selleckchem, #S1009), Apitolisib (Selleckchem, #S2696), S17092 (Sigma Aldrich, #SML0181), WNK463 (Selleckchem, #S8358).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Inhibitor Procurement and Utilization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Inhibitors were purchased from commercial suppliers as listed below, or were provided (Compound 29, (Patch et al., 2011 (link))) by the Donald McDonnell Laboratory (Duke University). ABT199 (Selleckchem #S8048), ABT263 (Selleckchem #S1001), LCL161 (Selleckchem #S7009), Birinapant (Selleckchem #S7015), Fomepizole (Selleckchem #S1717), CHR2797 (Tocris #3595), XCT790 (Sigma Aldrich #X4753), Topiramate (Selleckchem #S1438), ACET (Tocris #2728), Almorexant (Selleckchem #S2160), SB334867 (R&D Systems, #1960), anti-IL1R1 (R&D Systems, #AF269), anti-IL9 (R&D Systems, #AF209), anti-ITGAV (Abcam, #ab16821), Cilengitide (Selleckchem, #S7077), Guanidine HCl (Sigma Aldrich, #G3272), Dalfampridine (Sigma Aldrich, #275875), BEZ235 (Selleckchem, #S1009), Apitolisib (Selleckchem, #S2696), S17092 (Sigma Aldrich, #SML0181), WNK463 (Selleckchem, #S8358).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!