Endopro

Manufactured by Pentax

Sourced in United States

EndoPRO is a high-performance laboratory equipment designed for endoscopic procedures. It provides essential functions for endoscopic examination and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

Ec 3490fi, by Pentax (1 mentions)

6 protocols using endopro

Retrospective Analysis of Gastroscopy in Calgary

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

This study was approved by the University of Calgary Research Ethics Board. A retrospective cohort of all patients who underwent gastroscopy for symptoms of dyspepsia at one of four acute care sites in Calgary, a large urban center in Alberta with a population of 1.27 million was evaluated (10 ). A single electronic database, EndoPRO (Pentax), is used for endoscopic reporting for all urban endoscopy sites in Calgary. Data were extracted from this database to create a list of all endoscopies performed within the study period.
This study was performed in collaboration with the University of Calgary Physician Learning Program (PLP), with expertise in data-driven practice improvement for physicians, including audit and feedback.

Halasz J.B., Burak K.W., Dowling S.K., Murray B., Williams J., Misra T., Veldhuyzen van Zanten S.J., Kaplan G.G., Swain M, & Novak K.L. (2021). Do Low-Risk Patients With Dyspepsia Need a Gastroscopy? Use of Gastroscopy for Otherwise Healthy Patients With Dyspepsia. Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 5(1), 32-38.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Large-Scale CAADRR Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

CAADRR testing was performed for 15,471 patients with 19,331 colonoscopy reports from June 19, 2009, to February 28, 2013, and who had 158,645 pathology reports (endoscopy, surgical pathology, and cytology reports) recorded in our pathology database, including 32,450 colonoscopy reports (November 1998 to June 2009) exported from our retired EndoPRO database (Pentax Medical, Montvale, NJ) into the staging database to identify patients with prior colonoscopies. The CAADRR was tested in 3 phases.

RAJU G.S., LUM P.J., SLACK R., THIRUMURTHI S., LYNCH P.M., MILLER E., WESTON B.R., DAVILA M.L., BHUTANI M.S., SHAFI M.A., BRESALIER R.S., DEKOVICH A.A., LEE J.H., GUHA S., PANDE M., BLECHACZ B., RASHID A., ROUTBORT M., SHUTTLESWORTH G., MISHRA L., STROEHLEIN J.R, & ROSS W.A. (2015). Natural Language Processing As an Alternative to Manual Reporting of Colonoscopy Quality Metrics. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 82(3), 512-519.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Factors Influencing Colonoscopy Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Relevant variables were acquired using CCSC’s endoscopy reporting program endoPRO (Pentax Medical, Montvale, New Jersey, United States) and electronic nursing records. Patient-, procedure- and endoscopist-level variables were collected, including: patient age and sex; procedural indication (fecal immunochemical test [FIT] positive, surveillance/family history, or average risk); amounts and types of sedating medications, including use of reversal agent(s); depth of insertion, including presence or absence of cecal intubation; whether ECV was used; the number, estimated size, location, morphology, and histology of polyps found, biopsied or removed; procedure duration; withdrawal time (in cases without polypectomy); endoscopist specialty; and endoscopist study procedural volume.

Forbes N., Hilsden R.J., Ruan Y., Poirier A.E., O’Sullivan D.E., Craig K.M., Kerrison D., Brenner D.R, & Heitman S.J. (2021). Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort. Endoscopy International Open, 9(11), E1583-E1592.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Colonoscopy Data Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

We obtained data on colonoscopies from the Centre’s endoscopy reporting program endoPRO™ (Pentax Medical). Data elements included age, gender, presence of diabetes mellitus, procedure date, indication, depth of endoscope insertion, bowel preparation quality, duration of procedure and whether a polypectomy was performed. Pathology data was obtained from the Centre’s Pathology Database, which includes a structured summary of the pathology report. The summary is completed by trained nurses who reconcile each polyp reported at colonoscopy with the pathology report. The nurses also select an appropriate surveillance interval for the patient based on the individual’s underlying colorectal cancer risk (eg average risk) and the colonoscopy results using an algorithm based on the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer guidelines.[12 (link)]

Hilsden R.J., Bridges R., Dube C., Heitman S.J, & Rostom A. (2017). Scheduling rules for patients with diabetes mellitus that facilitate split-dosing improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. PLoS ONE, 12(7), e0182225.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Evaluating Esophageal Disorders via HD-iSCAN

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

All patients presenting with either dysphagia or food bolus impaction under the care of a single gastroenterologist (M. I.) were included in the analysis. Based on these criteria, 189 consecutive patients (53.4 % male, median age 55, age range 18 – 85 years) were assessed by HD-iSCAN endoscopy (Pentax EC-3490Fi; Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) with biopsies taken in the distal, mid, and proximal esophagus as well as from furrows or other endoscopic findings where visible. Esophageal endoscopic findings were photographed and catalogued on an electronic patient record (Endopro, Pentax, Japan) along with operator opinion on the suspicion or likelihood of EoE. Endoscopic reports and medical records were reviewed in order to obtain demographics and clinical details of the patients enrolled.

Gregory E., Fort Gasia M., Gui X., Ghosh S, & Iacucci M. (2017). High-definition-iSCAN virtual chromoendoscopy has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis. Endoscopy International Open, 5(7), E613-E621.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Outpatient EUS Procedures in Calgary

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

All adult CZ patients who underwent one or more outpatient EUS procedure were eligible for inclusion. We restricted the cohort to CZ patients to eliminate the possibility of not being able to conduct chart reviews among non-CZ patients who traveled to Calgary for their procedure, but later presented to an outside hospital after returning home. Patients were initially identified through the electronic reporting program endoPRO (Pentax Medical, Montvale, New Jersey, USA) used to document all endoscopic procedures in Calgary. Patients with no procedure reports, and those under the age of 18 years were excluded. Additionally, we excluded pancreatic cyst ablation with ethanol and cyst gastrostomy procedures due to low sample sizes. We further excluded patients who underwent EUS-guided celiac plexus block or neurolysis (CPB/CPN), as the indication for these procedures was abdominal pain and the majority of presentations to hospital after the procedure were for ongoing abdominal pain; we could not have determined whether the EUS procedure contributed to their pain or was simply ineffective. Patients who underwent EUS were administered conscious sedation by nursing staff under the direction of the attending physician.

Razik R., James P.D., Khan R., Maxwell C., Ruan Y., Forbes N., Williams A., Tanyingoh D., Brenner D.R., Kaplan G.G., Hilsden R.J, & Heitman S.J. (2021). Risk of adverse events associated with upper and lower endoscopic ultrasound: a population-based cohort study. Endoscopy International Open, 9(9), E1427-E1434.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!