The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using cd80 v450

1

Multicolor Flow Cytometry of Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophages cultured for 7 days were carefully harvested using Dispase enzyme solution and gentle scraping. Cells were counted and a minimum of 3 × 105 cells were used for each FACS staining. Fc receptors were blocked in 3% BSA in 1× HBSS (Gibco) for 10 min. As this study focused on membrane proteins, permeabilization and fixation of cells were omitted. Instead, cells were re-suspended in PBS and incubated with the respective antibodies for 30 min. Antibodies used for FACS were αCD163-APC and αCD90-PE (both Biolegend), CD11b-V450, CD11c-PE, CD40-FITC, CD45-PE, CD209-Cy5.5, CD80-V450, CD86-V450, CD146-PE, and CD206-FITC (all BD Pharmingen). Unstained cells were used as control, as well as an IgG control. Cells were washed twice after antibody incubation and re-suspended in PBS for counting. Cell sorting was performed on a LSR-II instrument (BD Bioscience) using FACSDiva8 acquisition and analysis software. Cells were gated in three steps; first, cells were discriminated by size employing forward and side scatter (FSC and SSC, respectively). Second, doublets were removed by pulse-geometry gating the area and height of FSC. Lastly, the fluorescence signal of cells positive for respective markers was gated directly, plotting it against the SSC area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Immunophenotypic Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All flow cytometric analyses were conducting using a Becton Dickinson fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) LSRII and analyzed using FloJo software as previously described.9 (link), 35 (link) JAM-1 surface levels were assessed using an anti-human or anti-mouse JAM-1 antibody (BD Biosciences Pharmingen) as compared to their respective isotype controls. The relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was used to determine JAM-1 receptor surface levels. Cellular apoptosis was assessed using Annexin V-450 and propidium iodide staining (BD Biosciences Pharmingen) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The percentage of dead cells was quantified using a Live/Dead Fixable Dead Cell Stain Kit (Invitrogen) per the manufacturer’s instructions. The following antibodies were utilized for immune cell phenotypic analysis: CD49b-V450, F4/80-BV421, CD8-V450, CD44-PeCy7, CD62L-allophycocyanin (APC)-Cy7, CD11c-APC-Cy7, CD80-V450 (BD Biosciences Pharmingen), CD335-APC, CD11b-APC-Vio770, Gr1-APC, CD3-APC, CD4-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), and major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII)-FITC (Miltenyi Biotec).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Differential Macrophage Polarization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated PBMCs from a single individual were divided into parts and cultured in presence of either control secretome, senescent secretome, control media or with positive controls: GM-CSF (10ng/ml) for M1 or MCSF (10ng/ml) for M2. Cells were cultured for 6 days with media change on every alternate day. On 6 th day, cells were trypsinised and recovered for surface markers in media containing 10% FBS for 3h in CO 2 incubator at 37 0 C. Cell surface markers were identified with CD68-FITC (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), CD80-V450 and CD86-PEcy7 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) as M1 markers and CD206-PEcy5 and CD163-APC (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) as M2 markers by using flow cytometry. The baseline parameters of the same individual were also checked on 0 day of treatment i.e. on the day of PBMC isolation and used for comparison. The frequencies of the different subpopulations were calculated using FlowJo ® software (Beckton-Dickenson, Franklin Lakes, NJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!