The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using ab77232

1

Myricetin Modulates Skeletal Muscle Metabolism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Myricetin (DY0103, HPLC ≥98%) was purchased from MUST Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China) for animal study. For cell experiments, Myricetin (70050) and DMSO (D2650) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) and horse serum (16050130) were bought from Gibco (Carlsbad, CA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Hyclone Laboratories, Inc. (Logan, UT, USA). Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) was purchased from Dojindo (Kumamoto, Japan). mirVana™ miRNA Inhibitors (rno-miR-499-5p, MH11352), mirVanaTM miRNA mimics (rno-miR-499-5p, MC11352), Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Transfection Reagent (13778083) and antibody against PGC-1α (PA5–38021) were bought from Invitrogen (Massachusetts, USA). Antibodies against slow skeletal myosin heavy chain (ab11083), fast skeletal myosin heavy chain (ab91506), Sox6 (ab30455), tnni1 (ab231720) and myoglobin (ab77232) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Antibody against Cytochrome C (Cyt C, sc-13,561) and β-actin (sc-47778) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Myocardial Necrosis and Macrophage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After all MRI studies, mice were sacrificed and hearts were extracted. Heart samples were thoroughly washed in saline solution and embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA, USA) and cut into 5 μm thick short-axis slices. To evaluate the necrotic myocardium, immunohistochemistry was performed on frozen tissue sections using a primary antibody against myoglobin (ab77232, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) [24 (link), 25 (link)]. To detect necrotic myocardium, a HistoMouse™-MAX kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to immunostain the sections, and color was developed using the Fast DAB with metal enhancer tablet set (Sigma-Aldrich). To analyze macrophage distribution, heart sections were stained with a primary antibody against CD68 (ab53444, Abcam) and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). The sections were counterstained with DAPI to visualize the nuclei. We evaluated colocalization of MNPs and macrophages in inflamed myocardium by color-coding the confocal laser scanning microscopic images using red for RITC (MNP), green for Alexa Fluor488 (macrophages), and blue for DAPI (nuclei). Stained tissue sections were digitally scanned using a slide scanner (SCN400, Leica, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MSCs were suspended to a final concentration of 1.0 × 106 cells/ml in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% (w/v) NaN3 and 5% (v/v) FBS. For specific staining, 100 μl of each MSCs suspension was incubated with 10 μl of each primary antibody for 20 min at 4 °C. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse monoclonal phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD73, anti-CD105, anti-CD90, anti-CD45 (BD Biosciences) and rabbit monoclonal anti-myoglobin (ab77232) from Abcam (1:50). Nonimmune, isotype-matched and isotype-conjugated mouse IgG1k and goat anti-rabbit IgG fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled (ab6717) antibodies were used as negative controls. For intracellular myoglobin staining, MSCs were permeabilized with Fix & Perm Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, before incubation with anti-myoglobin antibody; FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG was used as secondary Ab for Mb detection. Cells were assessed with Navios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, USA); the emitted fluorescent signal of 10,000 events for each sample was acquired and analyzed using the Kaluza Analysis software (version 1.3, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) as described [12 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Extraction and Analysis from C2C12 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We use RIPA lysis buffer containing 1 mM PMSF to lyse C2C12 cell or muscles. For the nuclear or cytoplasmic protein extraction, proteins were isolated according to the procedure of the nuclear extraction kit (Solarbio, SN0020). Protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein assays kit. After sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels, primary antibodies were used, including rabbit anti‐β‐tubulin (bs‐1482M, 1:5,000, Bioss), rabbit anti‐SUNCR1 (NBP1‐00861, 1:1,000, Novus), mouse anti‐MyHC I (ab11083, 1:1,000; Abcam), rabbit anti‐MyHC IIa (ab124937, 1:1,000, Abcam), goat anti‐MyHC IIb (sc‐168672, 1:500; Santa Cruz), mouse anti‐PGC‐1α (ST1202, 1:1,000, Millipore), rabbit anti‐histone (4499S, 1:2,000; CST), mouse anti‐NFAT (sc‐7294, 1:500; Santa Cruz), rabbit anti‐NRF‐1 (#12381s, 1:2,000, CST), rabbit anti‐calcineurin (#2614s, 1:2,000; CST), rabbit anti‐Myoglobin (ab77232, 1:1,000, Abcam), and rabbit anti‐MEF2A (#97365, 1:2,000; CST). Protein expression levels were determined using MetaMorph software (ImageJ, National Institutes of Health, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Myoblast Differentiation and Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated in 6‐well plates coated with 0.1% gelatin and induced for differentiation. After treatment, cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X‐100 in PBS, and then incubated with myoglobin (1:250; ab77232, Abcam) and myosin heavy chain (1:1,000; clone MF‐20 deposited by Fischman DA to Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank). Images were taken with a 40× objective lens on an inverted Zeiss Observer.Z1 microscope with an Axiocam MRm camera. The fiber widths were measured using the Axiovision software (release 4.8.2 SP2). Only fibers with at least three nuclei were measured in three places to obtain an average width for each fiber. At least three fields per condition for each experiment were measured. Measurements were analyzed in Microsoft Excel. For localization studies, cells were plated into an 8‐well μ‐slide (ibidi) coated with Matrigel (Corning) diluted to 1 mg/ml. Differentiated C2C12 myotubes were treated at various times and stained according to manufacturer's protocol. Images were taken with a 63× objective lens on an inverted Zeiss confocal laser scanning microscope 800 in the McGill University Life Sciences Complex Advanced BioImaging Facility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunoprecipitation of Myoglobin Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IP for His-Mb: Purified His-Mb protein was incubated with protein A magnetic beads and mouse anti-6 × His tag monoclonal antibody (Abcam, #ab18184)/mouse anti-IgG antibody (Abcam, #ab190475) overnight with shaking at 4 °C. The magnet was used to adsorb the beads, and the sample was washed three times with a binding buffer. Then, WB analysis was performed using rabbit anti-Mb monoclonal antibodies (1:2000, Abcam, #ab77232) and HRP-coupled goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (l:5000, ZSGB-BIO, #ZB-5301).
IP for Anti-Mb antibody: Total proteins from rat and mouse muscle tissue were extracted with IP lysis buffer and incubated with protein A magnetic beads and rabbit anti-Mb polyclonal/monoclonal antibody/rabbit anti-IgG antibody (Abcam, #ab172730) overnight with shaking at 4 °C. The magnet was used to adsorb the beads, and the sample was washed three times in a binding buffer. Moreover, WB analysis was performed using mouse anti-Mb antibody (1:100, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA, #sc-74525).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Muscle Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Equal amounts of protein (30 μg) were separated by SDS‐PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (BioRad). The membrane was blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 5% milk in TBS‐Tween (TBS‐T) and then incubated with the primary antibody in 5% BSA in TBS‐T (for p‐AKT, 1% BSA in TBS‐T) overnight at 4°C. After washing in TBS‐T, the membrane was incubated with a horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated secondary antibody (GE Healthcare) and visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Pierce ECL, ThermoScientific). Bands from each blot were quantified via densitometry using Gene Snap and Gene Tool image acquisition and analysis software (Syngene) and normalized to the loading control (‐tubulin). The antibodies used include mouse monoclonal anti‐myosin skeletal, slow (MyHCs M8421) and fast (MyHC‐f M4276) (1:1000; Sigma); rabbit polyclonal anti‐AMPK (2532) and anti‐phospho‐AMPK (Thr172; 2531) (1:1000; Cell signaling); rabbit polyclonal anti‐myoglobin (1:2000; Abcam ab77232); rabbit polyclonal anti‐AKT (9272) and anti‐phospho‐AKT (ser473; 9271) (1:1000; Cell signaling); mouse monoclonal anti‐tubulin (1:8000; Sigma T 6074); anti‐mouse and anti‐rabbit HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000, GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Muscle Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence was performed as previously described [20] (link). Cells were probed with antibodies against myosin heavy chain (MF-20, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) and myoglobin (ab77232, Abcam). Cell differentiation was determined by calculating the fusion index of muscle fibers (the ratio of the number of nuclei in a microscope field per number of nuclei in myofibers). Myofiber diameter was measured using AxioVision Rel 4.8 software (Carl Zeiss). Ten fields from each independent experiment were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!