The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Otespa

Manufactured by Bruker
Sourced in France, United Kingdom

The OTESPA is a high-performance atomic force microscope (AFM) system developed by Bruker. It is designed for advanced nanoscale imaging, characterization, and analysis of a wide range of samples. The OTESPA provides precise control and measurement capabilities for various applications in materials science, life sciences, and nanotechnology.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using otespa

1

Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging of Tyrosinase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM images were acquired in ambient air, on a Multimode-Picoforce AFM instrument (Bruker Nano, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA) using silicon probes (OTESPA, Bruker Nano, Inc.) with nominal tip radius of 7 nm and resonance frequency of ~300 kHz. The images were acquired using the “tapping” or oscillating mode of the instrument whereby the cantilever is vibrated near its resonance. Freshly cleaved mica disk substrates (12 mm) were modified to render them hydrophobic and positively charged by incubating them with aminopropyl-silatrane (APS) solution (0.17 mM) for 30 minutes, rinsing with ultrapure water and drying as described previously [26 (link)]. Five microliters of appropriately diluted solutions of highly purified human tyrosinase hTyCtr were deposited onto the APS-mica and incubated for 15 minutes, then gently rinsed with ultrapure water to remove salt, and dried in a nitrogen stream before imaging. The modified mica substrates ensured that the strongly negatively charged proteins would firmly attach to allow imaging. Images were pre-processed with the instrument software (Nanoscope Analysis, v 8.15) and then analyzed using the particle analysis features of NIH Image (ImageJ) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hierarchical Surface Topography Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The topographic images of the
coating surface were acquired using a commercial AFM system (Veeco
DI3100, Bruker Corporation). Tapping mode imaging techniques were
applied using a cantilever with a stiffness of 26 N/m and tip radius
of 7 nm (OTESPA, Bruker). The samples were imaged with different scan
sizes to investigate the hierarchical structures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging of Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 3×C2AB and 3×C2AB-YHRD were diluted in HEPES-buffered saline (HBS) to 0.4 nM, and 45 μl of each sample was deposited onto freshly cleaved mica (10-mm-diameter disks). After a 5-min adsorption period, the samples were rinsed with Biotechnology Performance Certified water (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to remove unabsorbed protein and dried under a stream of nitrogen gas. AFM imaging was carried out using a Multimode AFM equipped with a J-scanner and a Nanoscope IIIa controller (Bruker Digital Instruments, Billerica, MA). All samples were imaged in tapping mode in air, using silicon nitride probes (OTESPA; Bruker AFM Probes). These cantilevers had a spring constant of ∼40 N/m and a drive frequency of ∼300 kHz (10–20% below the resonance frequency). The applied imaging force was kept as low as possible (AS/A0 ∼ 0.85). Images were captured at a scan rate of 4 Hz, with 512 scan lines per area. Data analysis was performed using Nanoscope version 5.31r1 software (Bruker Digital Instruments). Protein length was determined by drawing a cross-section along the imaged protein structures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Atomic Force Microscopy Visualization of Fibrils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of fibrils was confirmed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). A small amount (typically 1 μL) of fibril solution was spread on a mica surface. The immobilization was allowed to proceed for 5 to 20 min, at 23 °C at a relative humidity of about 45%. The density of fibrillar structures on mica was increased or decreased by the immobilization time or the dilution rate. After adsorption, the surfaces were rinsed with distilled water, dried and visualized using the standard contact and tapping AFM modes by scanning probe microscope SPM D3100/Nanoscope IVa (Veeco, now Bruker). Two types of silicon tips, OTESPA and SNL (Bruker), were used. The images were processed by the Scanning Probe Image Processor, Version 5.1.0 software (Image Metrology, Denmark). The standard deviation was calculated according the formula:
where N is number of positions, xi is the height at the i position, and is the mean value of all heights.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nanomaterial Characterization by SEM, AFM, and DLS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sizes and morphologies of nanomaterials were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). SEM samples were prepared by depositing the above-prepared samples onto conductive glass, following by drying, washing with double-distilled H2O (diH2O) and further drying. Samples were coated with Au (5 nm) by spray, and observed on an S-4800 scanning electron microscope. For AFM of hNVs, samples (10 μL) were casted on freshly peeled mica substrate, followed by drying, rinsing, and dehumidifying. AFM was carried out in tapping-mode in air on a PicoForce Multimode AFM (Bruker, CA) equipped with a Nanoscope® V controller, a type E scanner head, and an OTESPA (Bruker, CA) AFM cantilever. AFM images were then analyzed by Nanoscope Software (ver. 7.3–8.15, Bruker, CA). The sizes of hNVs suspended in Dulbecco’s PBS were also characterized using dynamic light scattering (DLS) on a Nanoparticle Analyzer (HORIBA Scientific, Tokyo, Japan). Bright field or fluorescence images of fluorophore-labeled hNVs were taken on a Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope (Chesterfield, VA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM images were obtained using two different commercial atomic force microscope instruments, a Nanoscope Dimension V and a Dimension Icon atomic force microscope (AFM) from Bruker, USA, operated in TappingMode™. Al-coated silicon cantilevers (OTESPA, Bruker), with a stiffness of typically 35–47.2 N m–1 and typical resonance frequencies of 300 kHz were utilised. Image processing and analysis was conducted in Gwyddion by David Nečas and Petr Klapetek.57
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Particle Size Characterization of Aqueous Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A drop of the aqueous diluted formulations for particle size measurements was placed on a Formvar/Carbon coated grid (F196/100 3.05 mm, mesh 300, TAAB Labs Ltd, Berks, UK) prior staining with 2% uranyl acetate and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging as previously described [5, 14, 15] .
Similarly, the aqueous diluted formulations (5 μL) were placed on the surface of muscovite mica (1 cm 2 , Agar Scientific, Essex, UK) and left to dry for 2 minutes, and dried under nitrogen gas prior to being attached to a nickel disk (1 cm 2 ) using doubleside adhesive tape and placed on the AFM scanner (Multi-Mode/Nanoscope IV scanning proble microscope, Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). Measurements were performed in air under ambient conditions (T = 23 o C, RH = 21%) using the J-scanner (max xy = 200 μm). Scanning was performed in tapping mode using Si cantilevers with integrated tips (t = 3.6 -5.6 μm, l = 140-180 μm, w = 48-52 μm, Vo = 288-338 kHz, k = 12-103 N m -1 , R<7 nm; OTESPA, Bruker, France) and an RMS amplitude of 0.8 V.
The images were processed and dimensions measured using Nanoscope Analysis software (V1.4, Bruker).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Protein Complex Stoichiometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
tsA 201 cells expressing appropriate combinations of Orai1-Myc-His, σ1R-FLAG, and HA-STIM1 were treated with thapsigargin, followed by biotin-sulfo-NHS, and then purified using sequential avidin and anti-Myc affinity chromatography, as described in the Isolation of surface biotinylated proteins section. About 45 µl of proteins was added to a 1-cm2 mica disk, incubated at 20°C for 10 min, gently washed with water, and dried under nitrogen. Samples were imaged in air using an atomic force microscope (Multimode; Bruker). The silicon cantilever (OTESPA; Bruker) was set at a drive frequency of 271–321 kHz and spring constant of 12–103 N/m. The scan rate was 3 Hz, and the applied imaging force was kept as low as possible (target amplitude of 1.0 V and amplitude set point of 0.7–1.0 V). Molecular volumes for individual particles were determined using an image processor (version 5; Scanning Probe). For particles within complexes, particle heights (h) and radii (r) were measured manually using Nanoscope software. Particle volumes (Vm) were then calculated from Vm= πh(3r2+h2)6. Molecular volume (Vc), based on a known molecular mass (M0), was calculated from Vc = M0(V1+dV2)N0, where N0 is Avogadro’s number, V1 is the specific particle volume (0.74 cm3/g), V2 is the water specific volume (1 cm3/g), and d is the extent of hydration (assumed to be 0.4 g H2O/g protein).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Graphene Sheets Characterization by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Bruker Multimode 8 was used in tapping-mode with an J-type scanner, Nanoscope VI controller, Nanoscope v614r1 control software (Veeco, Cambridge, U.K.) and a silicon tapping tip (NSG01, NTI-Europe, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands) of 10 nm curvature radius, mounted on a tapping mode silicon cantilever with a typical resonance frequency 283–374 kHz and a force constant of 12–103 N/m (Bruker OTESPA, U.K.). Images were taken in air, by depositing 40 μL of the sample on a freshly cleaved mica surface (Agar Scientific, Essex, U.K.) coated with poly-L-lysine 0.01% (Sigma-Aldrich, U.K.) and allowed to adsorb for 2 min. Excess unbound material was removed by washing with Milli-Q H2O and then drying in air; this step was repeated once. Size distributions were carried out using ImageJ software to measure the lateral dimension of individual graphene sheets, by counting more than 100 sheets. Sheet thickness was determined from the AFM height profiles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!