The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using pcag egfp

1

Generation of Mouse DISC1 Expression Construct

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A full-length mouse DISC1 sequence was ligated into the retroviral vector pCAG-EGFP (a generous gift from Dr. Chunmei Zhao, Laboratory of Genetics, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA; also available for purchase from Addgene; Cambridge, MA, USA), linearized with Pmel and Sfil restriction sites to generate the DISC1 expression construct CAG-DISC1-EGFP. The DISC1 retroviral construct and pCAG-EGFP were packaged into 293T cells with packaging plasmids pCMV-vsv-g and pCMV-gp (Addgene) and titered (as high as 108 c.f.u./mL) as previously described (Tashiro et al., 2006 (link); Zhao et al., 2006 (link); Jessberger et al., 2007 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Plasmid-based Fluorescent Labeling Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For control conditions, we used a plasmid containing EGFP under the CAG promoter (pCAG-EGFP, Addgene plasmid #11150) [64 (link)]. DNA sequences containing mC4b (NM_009780.2, synthesized by Genescript) and hC4A (RC235329, Origene) were subcloned (InFusion Kit, Clonetech) into the pCAG backbone to produce pCAG-mC4 and pCAG-hC4A, respectively. Endogenous PSD-95 was fluorescently labeled in vivo using PSD95-FingR (EF1a-PSD95.FingR-RFP) [42 (link)]. For electroporations with RFP and fusion C4-GFP, pCAG-mRFP was obtained from Addgene (Addgene plasmid #28311) [65 (link)], and C4-GFP was made by inserting GFP from the pCAG-GFP plasmid C terminus to C4 using a GSSGSS linker (subcloned by Genescript). All plasmid DNA was purified using the ZymoPureII (Zymo Research) plasmid preparation kit and were resuspended in molecular biology grade water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Plasmid-based GFP Expression Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following GFP-expressing plasmids were used: pCMV-EGFP-N3 (Clontech), pCAG-EGFP (Addgene, originally developed by C. Cepko), pDCX-IRES-EGFP (kindly provided by Frank Polleux, Columbia University; [47 (link)], pU1-shRandom-hMGFP (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fluorescent Plasmid Validation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmids encoding fluorescent reporter proteins were used to validate electroporation: pCAG‐DsRed (Addgene: 11151), pCAG‐YFP (Addgene: 11180), pCAG‐EGFP (Addgene: 11150), pCAG‐CFP (Addgene: 11179), pCBA‐TdTomato (Addgene: 28017). Plasmids were amplified and purified according to the suppliers’ recommendations, filtered, and stored at −20°C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Spinal Cord Electroporation of Plasmids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
R-stage animals were electroporated in the spinal cord as descried before [40 (link)]. Briefly, animals were anesthetized in 0.02% MS222, and the plasmid pCAG:EGFP at 2,5 μg/μl (Addgene plasmid # 16664) or zGFAP::EGFP construct at 2,5 μg/μl (Addgene plasmid # 39761) was injected with a glass capillary into the central canal of the spinal cord. Voltage pulses were applied with a Grass SD9 stimulator (GrassTele-factor, USA) across the back using homemade platinum electrodes (5 pulses of 35 V in each polarity, 50 ms pulse length and 200 pps frequency). Animals were transferred into 0.1x Barth containing antibiotics. Screening of EGFP was perform 24 h after electroporation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Knockout in SW1116 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
KO was performed as recently described18, 25, 33 using pX330 and pCAG‐EGxxFP34 purchased from Addgene. In CRISPR/Cas9‐based gene disruption, guide (g) RNA sequences (5’‐AGCTGTGGCAGCGTCAACAG‐3′) corresponding to the MET gene (394–413 bp from the initiation ATG site), (5’‐GAGGGCGAACGACGCTCTGC‐3′) HER3 gene (3–22 bp from the initiation ATG site), and FOXM1(5’‐CCGTCGGCCACTGATTCTCA‐3′) gene (15–33 bp from the initiation ATG site) were designed using CRISPR direct (https://crispr.dbcls.jp/). SW1116 cells were used to generate HER3 and/or MET and the FOXM1‐KO cell line using the pX330 (Addgene) and pCAG‐EG × ×FP (Addgene) CRISPR/Cas9 vectors. The gene‐specific region of gRNA sequences was designed by the CRISPR design tool from CRISPR direct (https:/crispr.dbcls.jp/). Single clones were picked up and the KO efficiency was assessed by WB and FCM. Cells were seeded onto 35‐mm dishes (BD BioCoat, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) in 1 mL of RD medium, and plasmid DNA (5 μg) was introduced into cells of approximately 80% confluency using Xfect transfection reagent (Takara Bio Inc.). The co‐transfection of pX330 and pUC19 (#3219, Takara Bio) containing the puromycin‐resistant gene was also performed, and cells were cultured with puromycin (Invitrogen, 2 μg/mL) for 10 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SH-SY5Y Cell Transfection with GFP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pCAG-EGFP or pCX-HO1-2A-EGFP (Addgene, #74672) were transfected using a standard Lipofectamine 2000 protocol. SH-SY5Y cells were seeded with 2 × 105 cells/mL and incubated for overnight for transfection. Plasmid/Lipofectamine 2000 mixture ratio of 0.8 μg DNA: 1.0 μL lipofectamine 2000 in Opti-MEM were added into the cells which were changed to serum-free media. Cultured for 6 hours and the media were refreshed to the media with 5% FBS and refreshed again to the media with 10% FBS after 18 h. The cells were passaged for amplification at 24-h post-transfection if needed. To rule out the interference from non-transfected cells and get viable transfected cells for corresponding experiments, DAPI-negative and GFP-positive cells were sorted with BD influx cell sorter (MSU Flow Cytometry Core Facility).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!