The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti topbp1

1

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analyses were performed with anti-γ-H2AX (Millipore), anti-H2AX (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-RAD9 (Santa Cruz or Bethyl), anti-RAD17, anti-RAD1, anti-TopBP1, anti-CLASPIN (Santa Cruz), anti-tubulin, anti-CHK1, anti-CHK1-pS345, and anti-CHK2-pT68 (Cell Signaling Technology) antibodies. The antibodies against the phospho-peptides (pThr292: LQAHSpTPHPDC, pThr313: CAMETpTIGNEG, pSer326: CEGSRVLPSIpS) were raised by MBL (Medical and Biological Laboratories (MBL), Japan). HRP-conjugated antibodies were used as secondary antibodies, the ECL signal was incorporated using a Licor Odyssey Fc imager system, and the quantification was performed with the Image Studio software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Damage Response Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies from this study were as follows: anti-keratin-10, anti-loricrin, anti-TopBP1, and anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA); anti-E2F1, anti-p63, anti-ATR, anti-p-ATR, anti-CHK1, anti-p-CHK1, anti-CHK2, anti-p-CHK2, anti-RAD51, anti-Mre11, anti-NBS1, anti-BRCA1, and anti-BRCA2 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); anti-p73 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA); anti-p53 (Millipore, Burlington, MA); anti-p-TopBP1 (Abgent, San Diego, CA). AKT inhibitors MK2206 (2μM) and LY294002 (25μM) were purchased from SelleckChem (Houston, TX). Cell lysates were processed and assayed by western blot analysis as previously described 60 (link). Briefly, J2 feeders were firstly removed by Versene (PBS containing 0.5 mM EDTA) treatment and keratinocytes were collected and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer on ice for 30 minutes. The samples were then electrophoresed on SDS-page gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. At last the membranes were developed using ECL prime or ECL reagents (Amersham, Pittsburgh, PA) and chemiluminescence signals were detected using Eastman Kodak x-ray films.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblotting of Keratinocyte Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The inhibitors used in this study were as follows: 100 nM UCN01 and 5 µM VE822 (Selleckchem, Houston, TX); 10 µM pimozide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO); and 5 µM CHK2i (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). The antibodies used in this study were as follows: antiinvolucrin, anti-TopBP1, and anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA) and anti-STAT-5, anti-CHK2, anti-ATM, anti-p-CHK2 (Thr68), anti-p-ATM (Ser1981), anti-CHK1, anti-ATR, anti-p-CHK1 (Ser296), anti-p-CHK1 (Ser345), and anti-p-ATR (Cell Signaling, Inc., Danvers, MA). For Western blot analysis, cell lysates were processed as previously described (36 (link)). Briefly, keratinocytes were first isolated from J2 feeders by treatment with Versene (phosphate-buffered saline [PBS] containing 0.5 mM EDTA) and lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer on ice for 30 min. The protein samples were separated on SDS-PAGE gels and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were finally developed using Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) Prime or ECL reagents (Amersham, Pittsburgh, PA). Chemiluminescence signals were detected using Eastman Kodak X-ray films.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Damage Response Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies from this study were as follows: anti-keratin-10, anti-loricrin, anti-TopBP1, and anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA); anti-E2F1, anti-p63, anti-ATR, anti-p-ATR, anti-CHK1, anti-p-CHK1, anti-CHK2, anti-p-CHK2, anti-RAD51, anti-Mre11, anti-NBS1, anti-BRCA1, and anti-BRCA2 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); anti-p73 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA); anti-p53 (Millipore, Burlington, MA); anti-p-TopBP1 (Abgent, San Diego, CA). AKT inhibitors MK2206 (2μM) and LY294002 (25μM) were purchased from SelleckChem (Houston, TX). Cell lysates were processed and assayed by western blot analysis as previously described 60 (link). Briefly, J2 feeders were firstly removed by Versene (PBS containing 0.5 mM EDTA) treatment and keratinocytes were collected and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer on ice for 30 minutes. The samples were then electrophoresed on SDS-page gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. At last the membranes were developed using ECL prime or ECL reagents (Amersham, Pittsburgh, PA) and chemiluminescence signals were detected using Eastman Kodak x-ray films.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Antibody Characterization for Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detailed information of antibodies used in this study: anti‐Flag (Sigma, Rabbit, F7425), anti‐TopBP1 (Santa Cruz, Mouse, sc‐271043; BETHYL, Rabbit, A300‐111A), anti‐γH2AX (Novus, Rabbit, NB100‐384; CST, Rabbit, 9718), anti‐SCP3 (Santa Cruz, Mouse, sc‐74569; Novus, Rabbit, NB300‐232), anti‐rRNA (Novus, Mouse, NB100‐662), anti‐RPL7A (ABclonal, Rabbit, A13713), anti‐RPS3 (ABclonal, Rabbit, A2533), anti‐FBL (CST, Rabbit, 2639S; Santa cruz, Mouse, sc‐166001), IgG (Rabbit, CST, 2729), IgG (Mouse, CST, 3420), anti‐ATR (BETHYL, Rabbit, A300‐137A), anti‐Chk1 (Novus, Rabbit, NB100‐464), anti‐pATR (T1989) (GeneTex, Rabbit, GTX128145), anti‐pChk1 (Ser345) (CST, Rabbit, 2348), anti‐GAPDH (CST, Mouse, 97 166), anti‐pH3 (Ser10) (CST, Rabbit, 9701), anti‐Puromycin (Millipore, Mouse, MABE343), anti‐GAPDH (HUABIO, Rabbit, ET1601‐4), anti‐Histone H3 (CST, Rabbit, 4499S), anti‐ATM (GeneTex, Mouse, GTX70107), anti‐pATM (S1981) (ROCKLAND, Mouse, 200‐301‐400), anti‐pRPA (Novus, Rabbit, NBP1‐23017), anti‐Rad9 (Santa Cruz, Mouse, sc‐74464), anti‐RAD51 (abcam, Rabbit, ab63801).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!