The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

K alpha x ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Japan

The K-Alpha X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is an analytical instrument that provides information about the chemical composition and electronic state of the surface of a material. It uses X-rays to irradiate the sample and measure the kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectrons, which is characteristic of the elements present in the material.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using k alpha x ray photoelectron spectroscopy

1

Multimodal Characterization of Bio-Charcoal

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thermogravimetric-infrared
spectrometry (TG-IR, PE TGA4000 + SP2) instrument is used to test
the sample weight loss and gas production in a certain temperature
range, which can assist in determining the calcination temperature
program and reaction mechanism. The characterization of the crystal
structure was carried out mainly on a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer
with a diffraction angle of 5–90. Thermo Scientific K-Alpha
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using Al Kα rays as the
excitation source was used to further aid in the specification of
the structural information of the sample. The morphological characteristics
of bio-charcoal were mainly outlined by scanning electron microscopy
(SEM, FEI Scios 2 HiVac), field emission transmission electron microscopy
(TEM, FEI Talos F200s), and an auxiliary mapping test. The Na+ content in the cleaning solution was determined by inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Thermo Scientific
iCAP 6500 Duo). The surface wettability of porous carbon materials
is completed using a contact angle/surface tension measuring instrument
(Germany Dataphysics OCA20).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of Novel Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FT-IR was performed on VERTEX70 (Bruker, Germany). XRD was carried out on an Empyrean diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation (PANalytical B.V., Holland). 1H NMR was measured on Bruker 500 M (Bruker, Germany) with (methyl sulfoxide)-d6 as the solvent and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard. Elemental analysis was determined by an Elementar Vario EL III (Elementar, Germany). TGA was carried out on a TGA/DSC3+ thermal analysis system (Mettler toledo, Switzerland). The morphology was obtained by a SU8010 SEM equipped with an EDS detector (HITACHI, Japan). UV–vis absorption spectra were recorded on a U-3900 spectrophotometer (HITACHI, Japan). XPS was carried out on a K-Alpha+ X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (Thermo fisher Scientific, America). ICP-OES analysis was carried out on ICP-OES 730 (Agilent, America). IC analysis was carried out on ICS-1100 (DIONEX, America).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Modified Biochar Material

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystalline
structure of the material was measured using XPert PRO MPD type XRD.
SEM and energy-dispersive spectrometry were used to examine the composite’s
surface morphology and chemical composition. An infrared spectrometer
with Fourier transform was used to measure the functional groups of
biochar (FTIR). Using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS90 zeta potential
analyzer, the surface charge of the biochar before and after modification
was determined. The elemental composition of the material was determined
using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS). The multipoint N2 Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) method was used to measure the biochar’s specific surface
area and pore size distribution at 77 K. To measure the phosphate
concentration, a 952 N UV–vis spectrophotometer (Shanghai Yidian
Analytical Instruments Co., Ltd.) was used. The material mass was
measured using an electronic balance (OHAUS Instruments Co., Ltd.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Mb-Cu Nanoconjugates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FTIR spectroscopy was carried out on a Spectrum Two Spectrometer operating at a resolution of 4 cm−1 over 4000–450 cm−1; the sample for FTIR spectroscopy was lyophilized and ground with KBr to prepare KBr pellets.
TEM was performed on a JEOL JEM-2100F transmission electron microscope. The suspension was spotted on formvar-coated Ni or Cu grids, and the samples on Ni or Cu grids were then dried under vacuum.
XPS was performed using K-Alpha X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Binding energies were referenced to the C 1s line at 284.8 eV from adventitious carbon. The samples for XPS were re-dissolved with deionized water three times to get rid of the unattached Mb–Cu molecules.
ICP-AES was performed on an Agilent ICP-OES 730 Spectrometer operating with a plasma gas flow of 15 L/min, an auxiliary gas flow of 1.5 L/min, and an atomizing gas pressure of 200 kPa. The sample for ICP-AES was dissolved in double-distilled water and lyophilized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Characterization of GaOOH Nanorods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal structure of samples was analyzed by a Bruker D8 DISCOVER X-ray diffractometer (XRD). UV-Raman spectra were recorded on a Jobin-Yvon T64000 triple-stage spectrograph with spectral resolution of 2 cm−1. The thermal behavior of the GaOOH nanorod was investigated by thermal gravimetric analyzer (Pyris1 TGA). For the morphological and microstructural analysis, a Hitachi S-4800 field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped and a JEOL JEM-2100 transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were utilized. The ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption spectra were taken using a Hitachi U-3900 UV-vis spectrophotometer. The chemical composition of samples was characterized by a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Photocatalyst Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Information about the microscopic topography of the photocatalyst was obtained from the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images by using a Hitachi SU8010 SEM. The microstructure was characterized by the FEI-TALOS-F200X transmission electron microscope (TEM). From the Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR-650), information about the functional groups carried by the catalyst were obtained. The test wavelength range is set from 4000 to 400 cm−1. An Ultima IV X-ray diffractometer (XRD) was used to analyze the structure of the samples. The element properties were studied by Thermo Scientific K-alpha+X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). PerkinElmer and LAMADA950 ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy (UV-vis) provided UV absorption spectra and UV diffuse reflectance spectra. The ultraviolet diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV-vis DRS) displayed information about the light absorption by photocatalysts. Steady-state, transient fluorescence spectra of samples were obtained with a Hitachi F-4600 photometer. The Mott–Schottky curve, photocurrent response, and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) Nyquist plot were measured on an electrochemical workstation (CHI760E).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Ag@TiO2 Nanopigments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The prepared nanopigments were characterized physiochemically using the following techniques and methods: The purity formed phases, and crystallite sizes of Ag@TiO2-modified nanopigments were studied by X-ray powder diffraction (D/Max 2500 PC, Rigaku, Japan) using Cu target operating at 40 kV and 100 mA (with a scan speed of 4°/min) and Cu-Kα radiation of wavelength equals 1.54059 Å. The diffraction angle 2θ was scanned in the range 10°–80°. The morphology of the particles was characterized by a transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-2100, Japan) operated at 200 kV. Samples for TEM investigation were prepared by placing a drop of sonicated colloidal dispersion on the carbon-coated copper grid and then allowing the drops to dry in the air. The valence state and elemental composition of the prepared samples was characterized using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) operated with an Al-Kα micro-focused monochromator within an energy range up to 4 keV. UV–Vis spectrum was recorded at room temperature using a spectrophotometer (UV–Vis, JASCO V-570, Japan). Photoluminescence (PL) spectra are collected at excitation wavelength of 320 nm using a luminescence spectrometer (Varian-CARY Fluorospectrophotometer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Ag3PO4 Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of the Ag3PO4 particles on Si substrate were examined by field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Zeiss Sigma) with an in-lens detector and 5 kV accelerating voltage. Structural characterization was done on dried Ag3PO4 particles in powdered form. It was performed using a Bruker D8 Eco X-ray diffractometer (XRD) with a Cu Kα (λ= 1.5406 Å) source and a Lynx-eye detector in a Bragg-Brentano (θ -2θ) configuration in the 2θ range from 20° to 72°. A Thermo Scientific K-Alpha X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) setup equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα source (hν = 1486.6 eV) was used for the chemical analysis. The Ag3PO4 particles were drop-casted on FTO substrate for the measurement. The binding energy was corrected with respect to the adventitious carbon C 1s peak at 284.8 eV. The optical absorbance of the Ag3PO4 on a glass substrate was characterized with a Perkin Elmer 1050 UV/Vis/NIR spectrophotometer in the wavelength range of 300 nm to 900 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!