The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using emxmicro

1

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphologies of the as-prepared samples were obtained on a field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (Hitachi SU-8010), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (HT7700), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) (JEOL JEM-2001F). The crystal structures of the as-prepared samples were analyzed by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) (Empyrean 200,895) using Cu Kα radiation. Chemical structures of the as-prepared samples were measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Escalab250Xi) with Al Kα radiation. Raman spectra were obtained by a LabRAM HR Evolution unit. The metal content in samples was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Vista Axial). The X-ray absorption spectroscopic (XAS) measurements of the as-prepared samples were conducted in Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility and Taiwan Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Quantum Design MPMS-7 superconducting quantum interference device (MPMS-VSM) magnetometer was utilized to obtain the magnetic properties of the as-prepared catalysts. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) data of the as-prepared catalysts were acquired on a Bruker EMXmicro.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

EPR Characterization of HydA1 Enzyme

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EPR spectra shown are representative signals from at least two individual experiments. The individual experiments show some preparation dependent differences, but the amplitude of these background signals are negligible compared to the signal intensity of the [2Fe]adt activated HydA1. Measurements were performed on a Bruker ELEXYS E500 spectrometer using an ER049X SuperX microwave bridge in a Bruker SHQ0601 cavity (Fig. 2) or a Bruker EMX micro equipped with an EMX Premium bridge and an ER4119 HS resonator (Fig. 5 and S13–S15), both equipped with an Oxford Instruments continuous flow cryostat and using an ITC 503 temperature controller (Oxford Instruments). Measurement temperatures ranged from 10 to 20 K, using liquid helium as coolant, with the following EPR settings unless otherwise stated: microwave power 1 mW, modulation amplitude 1 mT, modulation frequency 100 kHz. The spectrometer was controlled by the Xepr software package (Bruker).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the measurement of ROS release, liver tissue samples of 20 mg were homogenized using at 6800 g for 30 s (Precellys 24 homogenisator, Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany). The samples were incubated for 30 min under normal atmospheric conditions with the spin CMH (Noxygen, Elzach, Germany) at a final concentration of 0.5 mM at 37 ° C in Krebs-Henseleit Buffer adjusted to pH 7.4. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and later determined using a X-band (9.65 GHz) ESR device (EMXmicro, Bruker GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) in frozen state, using the following parameters: G-factor 2.0063, center field ~3355 G, microwave power of 2.000 mW, receiver gain 50 dB, modulation amplitude 2.999 G.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Harwell Alanine Dosimeter Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Harwell alanine dosimeter consisted of 90.9% L-alpha-alanine and 9.1% paraffin wax as a binder. These dosimeters were 4.8 ± 0.1 mm in diameter and 2.8 ± 0.1 mm in height, and mass was 60.0 ± 2.0 mg within the overall batch and ± 0.6 mg within a lot (standard deviation of 0.3 mg). This study used alanine batch number BY616. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy (Bruker EMXmicro) is an X-Band machine installed with a standard ER 4119HS resonator (Bruker BioSpin Corporation). The EPR operation parameter was optimized at the radiotherapy level of 1–20 Gy. The acquisition parameters were set as follows: microwave power (MP): 2 mW, modulation amplitude (MA): 7.018 G, time constant (TC): 40.96 ms, center field: 3500 G, sweep width: 200 G, modulation frequency: 100 kHz, sweep time: 40.45 s, receiver gain: 30 dB, and number of scans: 3 times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ESR Spectroscopic Analysis of Spin Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HL-60 cells (5 × 106/500 μl of HBSS) were incubated for 20 min with 5 μl of either 5- or 16 DSA (0.01 M). The cells were then centrifuged and the pellets were resuspended in 500 μl HBSS supplemented with either 10−4 M NDS27, NDS28, 5 × 10−4 M HPβCD or γ-CD and incubated for 10 min at RT. Subsequently, cells were centrifuged and the pellet (resuspended in 500 μl of HBSS) and supernatant were transferred into separate micro-caps tubes (sealed with rubber and transferred into ESR tube), placed into the cavity of the ESR spectrometer. The ESR characteristic spectra of the 5-DSA and 16-DSA signals were recorded. The measurements were implemented at 300 K with a continuous wave spectrum EMX-micro of Bruker (Brüker, Rheinstetten, Germany), operating at fixed X-band frequency of 9.5 GHz and at a microwave power of 10.88 mW. The instrumental settings were as follows: 100 kHz modulation frequency, 2 G modulation amplitude, 3389.698 G magnetic field center, and 3.56 × 104 receiver gain. The sweep width was 89.652 G and the total number of scans was five.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Assessing Laccase-Ferrocene MOF Catalytic Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This experimental procedure was based on methods previously reported with slight modification.[61 ,
72 (link)
] Briefly, 0.5 mM GSH solution was mixed with different concentrations of Lac‐FcMOF. After stirring for various durations (1 h, 4 h, or 10 min) under different conditions, the GSH content was quantified using a reduced GSH content assay kit according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Fenton catalytic activity was characterized through MB degradation experiments and ∙OH capture using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 1750, Shimadzu, Japan) and an ESR spectrometer (EMXmicro, Bruker, Germany), respectively. For MB degradation experiment, the concentration of MB was 10 µg mL−1, Lac‐FcMOF was 100 µg mL−1, H2O2 was 10 mM, and GSH was 10 mM. For ∙OH capture experiment, 10 µL of DMPO was used as a radical trap, which was added into the suspension containing H2O2 (10 mM) or H2O2 (10 mM) + GSH (10 mM) + Lac‐FcMOF (100 µg mL−1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

EPR Analysis of Photoreaction Radicals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EPR spectroscopy was conducted on a spectrometer (EMXmicro, Bruker, Germany) to identify the radical species during photoreaction. A homogeneous solution was prepared by dissolving KCD (175 µM), TA (3.5 mM), and DMPO (the radical capturing agent, 3.5 mM) in toluene upon bulk ultrasonication (298 K, 30 min). The concentrations of KCD and TA were maintained to be identical to that during the nanosecond transient absorption characterization, respectively. Prior to measurement, oxygen was removed by continuous argon gas purge. Then, the solution was loaded in an EPR columnar quartz cell that was subsequently placed into the spectrometer. Radicals were generated upon exposure to light irradiation under a high-pressure mercury lamp and their signals were in situ recorded. The light wavelength was confined to be 420–780 nm. The applied parameters were set as follows: center field, 3514.2 Gauss (G); sweep width, 100 G; microwave power, 2.0 mW; modulation frequency, 100 kHz; modulation amplitude, 1 G; receiver gain, 30 dB; conversion time, 15 ms; time constant, 0.01 ms. The computer program EasySpin61 (link) was employed to fit the recorded signals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Intracellular and Extracellular ROS/RNS Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular and extracellular concentrations of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) were determined in lung homogenate by a Bruker electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrometer (EMXmicro; Bruker Biospin, Germany), using the spin probe 1-hydroxy-3-methoxycarbonyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolidine (CMH [40 (link)]). Lung tissue were homogenized in ESR-Krebs HEPES buffer (99.0 mM NaCl, 4.69 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2x 2H2O, 1.2 mM MgSO4 x 7H2O, 25 mM NaHCO3, 1.03 mM KH2PO4, 5.6 mM D(+) Glucose, 20 mM Na-HEPES, 25 μM deferoxamine, 5 μM diethyldithiocarbamate) containg protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Afterwards, samples were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with 0.5mM CMH. Following this procedure samples were collected into 1 ml syringes and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. The X-Band (9.65 GHz) ESR measurements were performed at room temperature (20 - 22°C). The experimental parameters were as follows: G-factor 2.0063, center field ~3360 G, microwave power 2,000 mW, receiver gain 50 dB, time constant 10,24 ms, modulation amplitude 2,999 G, modulation frequency 100 GHz. The data from ESR microscopy were normalized to protein concentration measured by DC protein assay from Bio-Rad.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

X-band EPR Spectroscopy Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All cw EPR experiments were conducted at X-band frequency on a Bruker EMXmicro (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) EPR spectrometer with the EMX standard resonator (4119HS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Detecting Nitric Oxide via EPR Spectroscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the detection of NO in solution, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy measurements were performed. An X-band (9.87 GHz) spectrometer (EMXmicro, Bruker) was used with a modulation frequency of 100 kHz, modulation amplitude of 0.1 mT, microwave power of 5.024 mW, receiver gain of 30 dB, and time constant of 0.01 ms. To detect NO, a nitronyl nitroxyl radical (NNR) spin trap (Carboxy-PTIO (2-(4-Carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide, Dojindo Laboratoire), was used at 60 μM, which forms an imino nitroxyl radical (INR) with NO. BMPO (5-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide, also Dojindo) was used as a spin trap for sulfur, hydroxyl, and superoxide anion radicals. For some experiment, 60 μM Carboxy-PTIO were mixed with 2 mM BMPO immediately before use. The spin trap solutions were freshly prepared prior each experiment and untreated samples were measured as respective controls. The maximum handling delay between treatment and measurement was three minutes. The spectra were recorded and evaluated by Bruker’s Xenon software. More details about the measurement procedure and evaluation of the spectra can be found in a previous publication [47 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!