The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using smartlab xrd

1

Comprehensive Characterization of COF Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PXRD data were detected on a Rigaku SmartLab XRD with 2θ ranging from 1° to 30° with 0.02° increment in a continuous mode. Powder samples without prior grinding were directly placed on zero background sample holders and leveled flat using a glass microscope slide. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) of all solid samples was tested using a ThermoNicolet iS10 FT-IR spectrometer with a diamond ATR attachment. The spectra were tested using 64 scans with a resolution of 4. The testing range was set from 4000 to 500 cm−1. The spectra shown are uncorrected. Nitrogen sorption measurements were conducted on Quantachrome Autosorb-iQ-MP/Kr BET Surface Analyzer. All samples were washed using different solvents (PFH, MeOH and THF) and dried under vacuum at 80 °C overnight in a laboratory heating oven. All samples were tested directly without grinding. BET surface areas for all samples were calculated using BET adsorption models (P/P0 ranging from 0.05–0.2) included in the instrument software (ASiQwin version 5.2). Pore size distributions were calculated using the quenched solid density functional theory (QSDFT) model included in the instrument software, which is mostly used for COF pore size calculations and matches the COF models best.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Crystallographic Analysis of Printed Metals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal structure of the printed metals were studied by XRD. A 10 mm × 10 mm size (consisting of 10 overlaying lines in 5 layers) sample was printed for both Cu and Ni. Ni and Cu were printed on the PI substrate. To make the sample surface flat, the PI substrate was firmly attached to a small glass slide. XRD measurements were performed in a Rigaku smartlab XRD using a Cu Kα radiation with a wavelength of λ = 0.15406 nm in the range of 2θ = 30°–100°. Scanning step size and speed were Δ(2θ) = 0.01° and 1 deg/min, respectively. The voltage and current were set at 40 kV and 44 mA, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Structural and Thermal Properties of Silk Fibroin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The secondary structure and conformation of the different silk forms were studied using FTIR-ATR, Vertex 70 version with OPUS 7.5 software (Bruker Optik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany). To determine the thermal properties, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using an SDT Q600 V20.9 (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The samples were subjected to a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 up to 1000 °C under nitrogen gas with a flow rate of 10 mL min−1. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured by a Rigaku Smartlab XRD (Rigaku, Neu-Isenburg, Germany) diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) in the 2θ range of 5–40°. The morphology of the silk fibroin nanofibers was observed using a JEOL-JSM-6010 Plus/LA scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) following sputter-coating with a gold layer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Synthesized Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phase analysis of the synthesized products was performed on a Rigaku Smart Lab XRD instrument. The documented pattern's 2θ range was from 5° to 80° with fixing steps of 0.01°. Before analyzing the samples, the machine was calibrated with a standard silicon reference. For X-ray diffraction, a copper tube made of ceramic (Cu Kα, λ = 1.54060 Å) was chosen as the X-ray source, and the temperature of the tube was maintained by a chiller operated at 23 °C with a water flow rate of 4.6–4.8 L min−1. To produce X-rays, the voltage and current were fixed at 40 kV and 50 mA, respectively, which is standard for the appended Cu-anode. Bragg–Brentano parafocusing geometry with a Ni-Kβ filter was employed to record the data of the standard as well as the samples. To identify the phase, the pdf + 42 021 software embedded with the ICDD database was functionalized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Seafloor Ringvent Samples Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ringvent samples collected at the seafloor by Alvin were studied at UNAM using a transmitted light microscopy (Olympus BX60) coupled with a Motic camera and a low-vacuum Hitachi TM-1000 table-top scanning electron microscope. Stable isotope geochemistry from fibrous aragonite cement samples, and the bivalve shell from Ringvent core P11, were analyzed at UNAM using a mass spectrometer Thermo Finnigan MAT 253 coupled with Gas Bench II, following published guidelines59 (link). Bulk mineralogy of seafloor samples was determined via X-ray diffraction (XRD) using an EMPYREAN diffractometer equipped with a fine focus Cu tube, nickel filter, and PIXCell 3D detector operating at 40 mA and 45 kV at UNAM. For this, samples were ground with an agate pestle and mortar to <75 μm and mounted in back-side aluminum holders. The analyses were carried out following previously published procedures22 (link). Phase identification was made with PDF-2 and ICSD databases. Mineral phases from core P11 were analyzed separately with a Rigaku Smart Lab XRD using 0.003° resolution, 5°/minute using a ICDD PDF4+ 2019 database (Ivano Aiello, Moss Landing Marine Laboratory).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Quininary HEMG-NP Systems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XPS spectra were obtained under UHV with a base pressure of 5 × 10−9 torr on a Kratos Axis Ultra DLD with a monochromatic Al kα source coupled with a hemispherical analyzer. High resolution XPS spectra were baseline subtracted with a Shirley background correction method for subsequent individual peak fitting and peak identification. High coverage HEMG-NP samples were electrodeposited on a glassy carbon rotating disk electrode (r = 2.5 mm) at 1000 rpm and −1.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl and subsequently rinsed with ethanol and water prior to analysis. High substrate coverage was confirmed via SEM prior to surface characterization by XPS. XPS survey scans indicated the presence of characteristic carbon and oxygen peaks consistent with the underlying glassy carbon substrate electrode. XPS survey scans and high-resolution element scans are presented in the supplementary information for two representative quinary HEMG-NP systems indicating the presence of metal oxide species. XPS peak identification of high resolution regions was achieved by comparing binding energy and peak splitting values with standard literature values. These high coverage samples were subsequently analyzed with a Rigaku Smartlab XRD in a 2θ grazing angle orientation to confirm the amorphous microstructure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of Prepared Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the prepared samples was characterized using a FESEM-field emission scanning electron microscope (Quanta 3D FEG). X-ray diffraction (XRD) diffractograms were recorded using Rigaku SmartLab XRD. Samples were characterized for optical study using a UV–Vis spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Cary 100 Series). Thin films of the samples were prepared by dissolving in ethanol for functional group study, and spectra were recorded by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Bruker Tensor 37 FTIR spectrometer). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on ESCA + Omicron Nano Technology with a characteristic energy of 1486.7 eV. Surface charge measurement of the samples was performed using zeta potential (Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS) using ethanol as dispersing solvent. Time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) measurement of the samples was recorded using a spectrometer (Horiba (DeltaFlex01-DD)). The intermediate and final degraded products of antibiotic degradation solution were examined by liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC–MS) from the Xevo TQD system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Material Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were of reagent
grade quality and were obtained from commercial sources and used without
further purification. A Rigaku Smart Lab XRD instrument with a sealed
Cu tube (λ = 1.54178 Å) was used in PXRD measurements.
A Varian INOVA 500 M spectrometer was used to perform 1H NMR with tetramethylsilane as the internal reference. Dalian Institute
of Special Gases provided carbon dioxide (99.995%), which can be used
as received. Raman spectroscopy (Lab Raman HR Evolution) measurements
were performed using a solid-state 633 nm laser, and a laser power
of 25% was used. A JASCO FT-IR-430 instrument was used to record Fourier
transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra which used KBr pellets. An Olympus
Fluoview FV1000 instrument was used to record confocal laser scanning
microscopy micrographs with λex = 488 nm. A Thermo
Fisher-6700 instrument was used to perform diffuse reflectance FT-IR
spectra. A Mettler Toledo TGA/SDTA851 instrument was used in thermogravimetric
analyses and applied under N2, with a ramp of 10 °C
min–1 up to 800 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Structural Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For structural characterization, high-resolution X-ray scattering measurements (Grazing Incidence X-ray diffraction and X-ray reflection) were conducted using in-house X-ray diffraction (Smartlab XRD, Rigaku). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)-ready samples were prepared using the in-situ FIB lift-out technique on an FEI Dual Beam FIB/SEM. The samples were capped with sputtered Ir and e-Pt/I-Pt prior to milling. The TEM lamella thickness was ~100 nm. The samples were imaged with a FEI Tecnai TF-20 FEG/TEM operated at 200 kV in bright-field (BF) TEM mode, high-resolution (HR) TEM mode, and high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) STEM mode. The STEM probe size was 1-2 nm nominal diameter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multi-Technique Characterization of Pollens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FEI Nova 200 NanoLab DualBeam TM-SEM/FIB was utilized to obtain Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images of the samples. FEI-TITAN microscope operating at an accelerating voltage of 300 kV was used to obtain Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images. X-ray diffraction was collected from 10° to 80° at 5 degree/min scan rate using Rigaku SmartLab XRD with a Cu Kα radiation source. Thermo Scientific DXR Raman Microscope with a 532-nm laser was used for Raman measurements. Kratos X-ray photoelectron spectrometer was employed for XPS measurement. Prior to XPS analysis, the samples were mechanically ground and dried at 80 °C overnight under vacuum. The process of thermal decomposition of pollens were evaluated from 30 °C to 800 °C at 10 °C/min heating rate under constant helium flow (100 ml/s) using a TA DST Q600 thermal gravimetric analyzer. Nitrogen sorption measurement at 77K was conducted using Quantachrome Nova 2200e surface analyzer. Prior to analysis, the samples were degassed at 300 °C for 12 hours.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!