The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7500 real time pcr cycler

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The 7500 Real Time PCR Cycler is a laboratory instrument designed for real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. It is capable of precisely controlling temperature and monitoring fluorescence signals during the amplification of DNA or RNA samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using 7500 real time pcr cycler

1

Gene Expression Analysis of Osteogenic Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from day 14 and 35 time point cultures using a Qiagen RNeasy Micro kit and protocol. To standardise for quantitative analysis, equal amounts of RNA from each sample were used for cDNA synthesis using the Qiagen QuantiTect RT-PCR kit and protocol. qRT-PCR was carried out using the Qiagen Quantifast SYBR Green kit and the reactions run in the 7500 Real Time PCR cycler from Applied Biosystems. Three biological (and 2 technical replicates from each) replicates were tested at each time point. Expression of test genes (alkaline phosphatase, OPN, OCN, SOX9, OPG, OSCAR, RANKL, interleukin 6 (IL-6), TRAP, tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) and cathepsin-K) was normalised against house keeping gene GapDH. The primer sequences (Table 1) for the genes were validated by dissociation curve/melt curve analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative RT-PCR for GPx3 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to manufacturer's instructions. First strand synthesis was performed on 600 ng total RNA using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), according to manufacturer's instructions. Gene transcripts were amplified using the primer sequences in Table 2 with iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) and an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real Time PCR cycler. Amplification was confirmed with melt curve analysis to confirm the presence of a single product. Quantification of each gene was calculated using the ∆∆Ct method with values normalized to RN18S levels and expressed relative to FT33-TAg cells.

Primer sequences used for semi-quantitative real-time RT-PCR.

Table 2
PrimerSequence
GPx3 Forward5′-GGGGATGTCAATGGAGAGAA-3′
GPx3 Reverse5′-TTCATGGGTTCCCAGAAGAG-3′
RN18S Forward5′-AGAAACGGCTACCACATCCA-3′
RN18S Reverse5′-CACCAGACTTGCCCTCCA-3′
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RT-qPCR Procedure for Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the measurement of gene expression by RT-qPCR, total RNA was isolated as described previously in Lamers et al. [46 (link)]. Briefly, 60 μL of sample was lysed in 90 μL of MagnaPure LC Lysis buffer (Roche) followed by a 30-min incubation with 50 μL Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter). Beads were washed thrice with 70% ethanol on a DynaMag-96 magnet (Invitrogen) and eluted in 50 μL diethylpyrocarbonate treated water. In total 500 ng of RNA were reverse transcribed with SuperScript™ IV Reverse Transcriptase using Random Hexamer Primers according to the manufacturers protocol (Promega). Subsequently, gene expression was determined with SYBR GREEN PCR Mastermix (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturers protocol on a 7500 Real Time PCR Cycler (Applied Biosystems) with gene specific primers listed in Additional File 1: Table S2. Relative expression values were calculated with the 2−ΔΔCT method and normalized to the average CT values of the housekeeping genes Gapdh and Rpl18. For quantification of SARS-CoV-2 specific RNA, a RT-qPCR targeting the E gene of SARS-CoV-2 was used as previously reported in Corman et al. [47 (link)] and Ct values were compared to a standard curve derived from a titrated D614G virus stock.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Hypoxia Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Real time semi-quantitative RT-PCR was carried out on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR cycler, with the following primer pairs: HIF-1α, 5’-TGCTCATCAGTTGCCACTTCC-3’ (forward) and 5’-CCAAATCACCAGCATCCAGAAGT-3’ (reverse); HIF-2α 5’-AGTGCATCATGTGTGTCAACTACG-3’ (forward) and 5’-GGGCTTGAACAGGGATTCAGTC-3’ (reverse); MMP-1, 5’-CCAAACCCACTCCACCTTAC-3’ (forward) and 5’-TCATCTTTCCCTTGCGGTA-3’ reverse); VEGF, 5’-GCTGCTCTACCTCCACCATGC-3’ (forward) and 5’-CCATGAACTTCACCACTTCGTG-3’ (reverse); β-actin, 5’-CTCTTCCAGCCTTCCTTCCTG-3’ (forward) and 5’-CAGCACTGTGTTGGCGTACAG-3’ (reverse). The reaction components were mixed with 10 µl of SYBR master enzyme mix, 5µl of cDNA (10 ng/µl), 0.2 µl of each primer (10 µM) and 4.6 µl of nuclease free water. The reaction conditions were 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 59 °C for 30 s and 95°C for 15 s. The melting curves were analyzed from 60°C to 95°C with continuous fluorescence reading. Data were analyzed using the comparative CT method with values normalized to β-Actin levels and expressed relative to levels in untreated 253J cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative PCR Protocol for MSCs and MNCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from MSCs after five days of culture before seeding them on POMA slides for ECM generation as well as from 24h stimulated MNCs using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using RevertAid cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo-Fisher, Germany) with oligo-dT primers. Relative target quantity was determined using the comparative CT(ΔΔCT) method. RT-PCR was performed using SYBR Green/ROX PCR master mix (Thermo-Fisher, Germany) and target specific primers (Supplementary Table S2) on a 7500 Real-time PCR cycler (Applied Biosystems, Germany). Amplicons were normalized to U6, respectively. All samples were run in duplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Heparanase and Syndecan-1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA extraction was obtained using the TRIzol® reagent (Life Technologies™ by Ambion, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription was performed using the reverse transcriptase enzyme ImPromII® (Promega Co.®, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to obtain complementary DNA (cDNA). The mRNA expression of heparanase isoforms (HPSE and HPSE2) and Syn-1 were analyzed using the following primers: HPSE forward, 5′TGGCAAGAAGGTCTGGTTAGGAGA3′ and reverse, 5′GCAAAGGTGTCGGATAGCAAGGG3′; HPSE2 forward, 5′AGACAGAG CTGCAGGTTTGAAGGA3′ and reverse, 5′AGCTTAGGAAATCGAGCCAGCCAT3′; Syn-1 forward, 5′AGGGCTCCTGCACTTACTTGCTTA3′ and reverse, 5′ATGTGCA GTCATACACTCCAGGCA3′. The expressions of the endogenous genes 60S ribosomal protein L13A (RPL13a) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were analyzed using the following primers: RPL13a forward, 5′TTGAGGACCTCTGTGTATTTGTCAA3′ and RPL13a reverse, 5′CCTGGAGGAGAAGAGGAAAGAGA3′; GAPDH forward, 5′TCGACAGTCAGCCGCATCTTCTTT3′ and GAPDH reverse, 5′GCCCAA TACGACCAAATCCGTTGA3′. The values are expressed as −ΔCt. Amplification was performed using Maxima® reagent SYBR® Green qPCR Master Mix (2x) (Applied Biosystems®, CA, USA) using a 7500 Real Time PCR Cycler® (Applied Biosystems®, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Viral RNA Extraction and Real-Time RT-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 500 μL of Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) (Nutricell, Brazil) was added to the microtube containing the swab with the biological sample. The remaining procedure was performed according to the QIAamp® Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, CA, USA) manufacturer's instructions.
Each extracted RNA sample was subjected to Real Time RT-qPCR using previously published primers for the 5′-Untranslated Region (UTR) of AvCoV (Callison et al., 2006 (link)) with the addition of a double Quencher. Amplification of the 143-bp fragment was performed in a 7500 Real Time PCR Cycler (Applied Biosystems™, CA, USA) using the following primers and probes (IDT, Iowa, USA): 5′ UTR forward primer, 5′-GCT TTT GAG CCT AGC GTT-3′; 5′ UTR reverse primer, 5′-GCC ATG TTG TCA CTG TCT ATT-3′; 5′ UTR probe, 5′-/5HEX/CA CCA CCA G/ZEN/A ACC TGT CAC CTC/3IABkFQ/-3′.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from undifferentiated NPCs using the ReliaPrep-Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, United States) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Amount and purity of the isolated RNA was measured with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer ND-100 (Peqlab Biotechnologie GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). One microliter RNA was transcribed into cDNA with qScript cDNA SuperMix (Quantabio, Beverly, MA, United States) according to the manufacturers protocol. Primers were designed using Primer3web and synthesized by Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland). Efficiency has been performed with serial dilution and an efficiency of 2.0 ± 0.15 was taken as sufficient. Primers are listed in Table 1. For quantification, cDNA was diluted 1:50. All experiments were done in a 7500 real-time PCR cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States) with SYBR Green Master Mix (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Relative gene-expression was calculated as 2–ΔΔCT values by normalizing to the house-keeping genes GAPDH and β-actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Differential Gene Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differentially gene expression analysis was performed with DESeq2 v1.28.1 (Love et al., 2014 (link)) and the R statistical software version 4.0.2 (R.Core.Team, 2020 ). Most data manipulations were performed with functions of the R packages dplyr (Wickham et al., 2021 ) and matrixStats (Bengtsson, 2021 ). Minimal filtering was applied to exclude genes that had zero counts in all datasets. Paired analysis was performed to correct for donor-to-donor variation, and non-polarized M0 macrophages were included as controls. The differential gene expression analysis included Benjamini & Hochberg corrections and gene expression levels were considered significantly different when padjusted < 0.05. Genes were considered differentially expressed when log2 fold change < -1 or > 1. An additional threshold of > 0.5 reads per kilo base per million mapped reads (RPKM) was used to only include substantially expressed genes in downstream analyses. The expression levels of a selected set of genes were validated by quantitative PCR (qPCR), using SYBR Green PCR Mastermix (Applied Biosystems) and a 7500 Real Time PCR Cycler (Applied Biosystems). Expression levels were normalized against the housekeeping gene TBP. ΔCt values of the selected genes and the used primers are shown in Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 2, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying C. burnetii Growth in MEFs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEFs were plated at 1 × 105 cells/well in a six-well plate under different cholesterol conditions and allowed to adhere overnight. After the MEFs were infected with C. burnetii for 1 h in 500 µl medium, the wells were washed with PBS to remove extracellular bacteria and then gently scraped into 3 ml of medium. For the day 0 sample, 1 ml of the cell suspension was centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 10 min, and the pellet was frozen at −20°C. The remaining cells were left in the six-well plate in medium supplemented with cholesterol. The medium was changed daily to ensure constant cholesterol concentrations. At 6 days postinfection, the cells were harvested by scraping the cells into the growth medium and centrifuging at 20,000 × g for 10 min. Bacterial DNA was extracted from the pellets using the UltraClean microbial DNA isolation kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative PCR for genome equivalents was performed using a primer set specific for dotA (30 (link)) and Luminaris Color HiGreen quantitative PCR (qPCR) master mix (Thermo Scientific) with an Applied Biosystems 7500 real-time PCR cycler. Each experiment was done in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!