The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using tandem mass tags

1

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Plasma Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted from the plasma exosome samples; one part was used for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) after the determination of the concentration, while the other part was digested with trypsin. Tryptic peptide mixtures labeled with tandem mass tags (Thermo Scientific, Rockfors, IL, USA) were prepared according to the standard procedure. Six labeled peptide mixtures were combined and subjected to reversed-phase chromatographic separation and mass spectrometry analysis by Shanghai Luming Biological Technology. Database searching was conducted using Proteome Discover 2.4 (Thermo Fisher, San Jose, CA, USA) with the following parameters: static modification: tandem mass tag 6-plex (N-term, K); dynamic modification: oxidation (M), acetyl (N-term); digestion: trypsin; ms1 tolerance: 10 ppm; ms2 tolerance: 0.02 Da; missed cleavages: 2. Gene Ontology (GO) term and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were used for biological categorization of the significantly differentially expressed proteins under SAP conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Proteomics of DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Logarithmic cultures of BY4741 WT strain grown at 30°C with or without MMS (0.05% for 2 h) treatment were pelleted and frozen. Frozen pellets were lysed, reduced, alkylated, trypsin digested, and purified using the SP3 method (Hughes et al., 2014 (link)) with modifications (Hughes et al., 2016 (link)). Samples were analyzed as detailed by Hughes et al. (2016) (link); in brief, prepared peptide samples were labeled with individual tandem mass tags (Thermo Fisher Scientific), combined in sets of 10, and subjected to offline high-pH fractionation/concatenation, and then fractions (12) were analyzed by reverse-phase nanoelectrospray liquid chromatography on an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometry platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using MS3 scanning.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Serum Proteome Profiling Using Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sample was depleted of the 6 most abundant serum proteins using a Multiple Affinity Removal LC Column - Human 6 (Agilent). The depleted samples were subjected to protein precipitation using ice-cold acetone. Precipitated protein samples were resuspended in a solution of 8 M urea and 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, reduced with dithiothreitol, alkylated with chloroacetamide, and digested with trypsin at a 1:25 enzyme/substrate ratio. The resulting peptide samples were desalted using Oasis C18 cartridges (Waters), dried by vacuum centrifugation, and labeled with tandem mass tags (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Labeled peptide samples were combined into 1 sample that was fractionated by basic reverse-phase chromatography, and pooled fractions were analyzed with an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer. Mass spectrometry data were analyzed with Proteome Discoverer v2.2, using a human UniProt protein database that interrogates complex proteomes by matching mass spectra to a sequence database for protein identification. Results were filtered to a 1% false discovery rate at the peptide and protein levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Proteomic Analysis of Ischemic Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the model and the DZXI groups, tissues (four replicates in each group) around the ischemic core were harvested after 7 days of treatments. The samples were digested with trypsin and labelled with TMT (tandem mass tags, Thermo). The same amount of each labelled sample was mixed, chromatographically separation, and finally subjected to an LC-MS/MS analysis. The peptide mass maps were analysed using Proteome DiscovererTM2.2 software (Thermo) and the UniProt database. The significantly different proteins between the two groups were identified with fold change (FC) >1.5 and p value (calculated by t-test) < 0.05. These differentially expressed proteins were entered as foci into the subsequent clustering analysis, GO analysis and molecular networks generated from the STRING database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Serum Collection and Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were collected from the retroorbital plexus of control and PD mice, thus allowing the fresh serum to be obtained without sacrificing the animals. Sodium citrate was used as an anticoagulant. The blood was centrifuged at 1000×g for 10 min at 4 °C to collect the supernatant. Aliquots of supernatants were mixed with protease inhibitor (Complete Mini EDTA-free, Roche Applied Science, Basel, Switzerland) and stored at −80 °C.
Before analysis, serum samples were thawed on ice and were collected and mixed thoroughly with 20 % acetonitrile (ACN) (v/v), and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 20 min. Samples were filtered through a 10-kDa MW cut-off filter to remove highly abundant high-MW proteins. The filtrate was desalted and concentrated using C18 solid phase extraction and dried under a vacuum. Plasma protein concentrations were determined using a BCA assay (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Peptides in each sample were detected using tandem mass tags (ThermoFisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Proteomic Profiling of Mouse Aortas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total protein from mouse aortas was isolated, and the concentration was measured using BCA for proteomics analysis. 50 μg of protein was taken from each sample and adjusted to the same concentration and volume. Dithiothreitol (DTT) was added to the above protein solution to make the final concentration of DTT 5 mM, and incubated at 55 °C for 30 min. Add the appropriate volume of iodoacetamide to make a final concentration of 10 mM and then 6 times the volume of acetone to the above solution to precipitate the protein at -20 °C overnight. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation and digested overnight at 37 °C with trypsin. Tryptic peptides were vacuum-dried and labeled using Tandem Mass Tags (Thermo, USA) under the manufacturer’s instructions. Peptide fragments were separated by high pH liquid chromatographic and then analyzed by MS. Data were analyzed using Proteome Discover 2.4.1.15 (Thermo, USA). The p-values of trusted proteins calculated with Student’s t-test showed significant differences (fold-change ≥1.2 and p-value < 0.05) between groups. The biological function of the proteins was analyzed using KEGG and Gene Ontology databases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

LTBP4 Cleavage by ADAMTS7: Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified LTBP4S-A (80 μg) was incubated for 25 h with 70 nm purified ADAMTS7-T8 in 50 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 5 mm CaCl2 in the presence or absence of broad-spectrum metalloprotease inhibitor GM6001 (90 μm). Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE/Coomassie Blue to confirm proteolysis and the absence thereof in the cleavage and control condition, respectively. New N termini generated by ADAMTS7 were labeled with Tandem Mass Tags (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer's instructions prior to incomplete digest with trypsin (Thermo Fisher), chymotrypsin (Thermo Fisher) and Glu-C (Thermo Fisher). LC-MS/MS was performed at the Proteomic Facility of the University of Liège using an ACQUITY UPLC M-Class System (Waters) hyphenated to a Q Exactive (Thermo Scientific), in nanoelectrospray positive ion mode. Data were analyzed with Proteome Discoverer version. 2.1.1.21. The protein/peptide identifications were performed against a bovine background protein database supplemented with the sequence of the human target protein LTBP4. Search parameters were set as “no Enzyme” because of the specific multi-enzymatic limited digestion that was applied. Scissile bonds were derived from peptides labeled with TMT at the N terminus that were identified in the active protease condition, but not in the control condition. All reported peptides have a false discovery rate equal or lower than 0.01.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Proteomics of Treated Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The TMT (Tandem Mass Tags) technology innovated by Thermo SCIENTIFIC. Co. USA, was used to measure the expression level of proteins. Samples were gathered right after lights off from treated plant treated for 3 days exposure time was 12 hours , so did the 7-day treatment group. For the untreated samples, we collected samples for three times: 0day, 3 days and 7 days; collecting time was consistent with the treatment groups. A total of leaves of the same size were selected, stored in liquid nitrogen then delivered to Novogene technology Co. (Beijing, China) for proteomic and transcriptomic analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Tandem Mass Tag Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents for the cell culture and digestion of the samples were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Dorset, UK) unless stated. Tandem Mass Tags ® (Thermo Scientific), Acetonitrile (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) Trypsin (Roche Diagnostics, West Sussex, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Targeted Proteomics Profiling in Bruneck Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Targeted proteomics profiling in plasma samples of the Bruneck Study (year 2000 evaluation) was performed using multiple reaction monitoring (PlasmaDive kits; Biognosys AG), which allowed quantification of 92 proteins (for details, see Supplementary Data). During continuous operation over 2 weeks, the interday relative SD was <20% and <5% without and with adjustment for the peak area of the authentic standard peptides, respectively.
Proteomics analysis of livers from antagomiR-treated mice was performed after an in-solution digest by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Differential protein expression was assessed by two methods (for details, see Supplementary Data): by spectral counting using a high-mass accuracy instrument (Q-Exactive HF; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and by labeling with Tandem Mass Tags (TMT) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the triple-stage mass spectrometry (MS3) capability on an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific). MS3 can overcome the inherent interference of more commonly used two-stage (MS2) workflows when isobaric labeling strategies are used with complex samples (20 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!