The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bodybox 5500

Manufactured by Medisoft
Sourced in Belgium

The BodyBox 5500 is a medical device designed to assess body composition. It utilizes advanced technology to measure an individual's body fat percentage, lean muscle mass, and other relevant metrics. The BodyBox 5500 provides objective data to healthcare professionals, without making any claims about its intended use.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

12 protocols using bodybox 5500

1

Clinical Characterization of COPD Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As reported before [3 (link)], symptoms and relevant clinical data were recorded using validated questionnaires (St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) [16 (link)] and Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Questionnaire [17 ]). Toxic habits including tobacco and marijuana smoking and systemic drug use were self-reported. Alcohol consumption was measured with AUDIT test (AUDIT-C [18 (link)]). HIV predictors (viral load and quantification of lymphocyte populations) were determined in peripheral venous blood laboratories and equipment commonly used in our center. Forced spirometry and carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity (DLCO) were measured (Medisoft Bodybox 5500, Medisoft, Belgium) following international guidelines [19 (link)]. Reference values were those of a Mediterranean population [20 ,21 (link)]. The presence (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7) and severity of airflow limitation was established according to the GOLD criteria [1 (link)]. DLCO was corrected for hemoglobin values following standard methodology. A DLCO< 80% of the reference value was considered abnormal [22 ]. The six-minute walking distance (6-MWD) was determined following international standards [23 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Pulmonary Function Measurement Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spirometry and plethysmography were performed with participants seated using automated equipment (Vmax EncoreTM 29C, CareFusion, Yorba Linda, CA, United States; Medisoft Body Box 5500®, Medisoft Belgium, Sorinnes, Belgium) and according to recommended techniques (Macintyre et al., 2005 (link); Miller et al., 2005a (link),b (link); Wanger et al., 2005 (link)). Measurements were referenced to predicted normal values (Briscoe and Dubois, 1958 (link); Burrows et al., 1961 (link); Crapo et al., 1981 (link); Hankinson et al., 1999 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pulmonary Function Tests in Pandemic

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pulmonary function tests were performed at BodyBox 5500 (Medisoft, Belgium) according to the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society guidelines [18 (link)].
Each subject underwent a full pulmonary function test consisting of spirometry, lung volumes, and diffusing capacity. Recorded parameters included forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, functional residual capacity (FRC), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), RV/TLC ratio, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO, corrected for hemoglobin). The PFTs were performed on patients at the same time of day (before noon) by the same technician in all subjects.
The spirometry, lung volumes, and DLCO were expressed as median, extreme in liters, and a number of results lower than 80% of predicted normal values, respectively.
Staff performing PFT wore personal protective equipment (N95 face masks, eye goggles or face shields, gloves, and gowns). Disposable virus and bacterial filters were used during each test. Strict hand hygiene protocols were followed by the operator and the patient.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

COPD Patients Plethysmography Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifty-four stable COPD patients, as defined by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines, were included in our study with the diagnosis confirmed by plethysmography (Body Box  5500, Medisoft, Belgium). The parameters evaluated during plethysmography were compared with normal values [22 (link)] and the diagnosis of COPD was especially based on a postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio below 70% of theoretical FEV1/FVC [1 (link)]. Exclusion criteria were the presence of exacerbations within the last month, unstabilized disease (e.g., cardiac, inflammatory, and neuromuscular), disability that could modulate OS and limit exercise capacity, antioxidant supplementation (vitamins, trace elements, etc.), and use of drugs such as allopurinol and N-acetylcysteine within the last month or use of oral corticosteroids over the last six months. All had been referred for a rehabilitation program at “La Solane” Pulmonary Rehabilitation Center, in Osséja, France. All patients received a detailed information letter about the study before providing their written informed consent. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee Montpellier Sud-Méditerranée IV (n°2011-A00842-39) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the European guidelines for “good clinical practice.”
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Plethysmographic Pulmonary Function Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LFD were determined by one qualified person (AK in the authors’ list) via a plethysmograph (Body-box 5500, MediSoft, Belgium). The latter was calibrated each morning. The following data were determined: flow-volume curve’ data [FVC (L), FEV1 (L), PEF (L/s), MMEF (L/s), forced expiratory flow when x% FVC remains to be exhaled (FEFx%, L/s)], volumes and capacities [expiratory reserve volume (ERV, L), inspiratory reserve volume (IRV, L), inspiratory capacity (IC, L), slow vital capacity (SVC, L), residual volume (RV, L), TLC (L), thoracic gas volume (TGV, L)], ratios (FEV1/FVC, FEV1/SVC, RV/TLC, absolute values), and specific airway resistance (sRaw, kPa*s).
The plethysmographic measurements were performed according to the international recommendations [34 (link), 35 (link)], widely described elsewhere [8 (link), 10 (link), 24 (link), 36 (link)], and the reproducibility and acceptability criteria were respected [34 (link), 35 (link)]. The acceptability and reproducibility of the FVC maneuvers were described elsewhere [24 (link)]. Regarding the TGV repeatability, at least three values were obtained so that the difference between the highest and the lowest TGV values divided by the mean was ≤ 0.05 [35 (link)]. The TGV average value was selected [35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Respiratory Function Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spirometry/plethysmography will be carried out as recommended by the European Respiratory Society (30 (link)) using Body Box equipment (Medisoft Bodybox 5500, Sorinnes, Belgium). With the exception of the FEV1/FVC ratio, which is calculated as litres/litres, all outcomes listed in Table 2 will be calculated as both % predicted values and as litres.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Spirometric Lung Function Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All subjects underwent spirometry (Medisoft Body Box 5500, Sorinnes, Belgium). FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) and FVC (forced vital capacity) were measured, and the FEV1/FVC ratio was calculated and compared with normal values [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Lung Function Evaluation in Overweight Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PFTs were performed according to the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines [25 (link)] (BodyBox 5500 Medisoft Sorinnes, Belgium). Vital capacity (VC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, expiratory reserve volume (ERV) were measured during spirometry [26 (link)]. Residual volume (RV), functional residual capacity (FRC), and total lung capacity (TLC) were measured during plethysmography [27 (link)]. As the plethysmography cabin is not suitable for patients weighing more than 150 kg, spirometric measurements only (including FEV1, VC, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and ERV) were performed in patients weighing more than 150 kg. Results are expressed in milliliters and percentage of predicted values. A restrictive defect was defined as a TLC < 80% of predicted value. The carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lung (DLCO) was measured and expressed in percentage of predicted values [28 (link)]. As data concerning patients ethnicity was not collected in this study, ethnicity was not taken into account in PFTs predicted values results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Pulmonary Function Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent PFT using Medisoft BodyBox 5500. Spirometry including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC curve (FEF25-75), as well as lung volumes including total lung capacity (TLC) and vital capacity (VC) and lung diffusing capacity were performed. Global lung initiative (GLI) reference values were used for spirometric and lung diffusing capacity results.13 (link) Single-breath technique for lung diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide was used. Results were expressed in percentage of expected value and in Z scores according to GLI references. For TLC, Rosenthal equations were used to obtain percentage of expected value and Z scores.20 (link) These results were normalised using reference values recently published for mean, lower limit of normal (LLN) and ULN.21 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

COPD Rehabilitation Center Referral Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stable COPD patients (40 to 78 years old) referred to the La Solane Pulmonary Rehabilitation Center (5 Santé /Fontalvie Corporation, F-66340, Osséja, France) were recruited. COPD was defined by the occurrence of dyspnea, chronic cough or sputum production, and/or a history of exposure to risk factors for the disease and postbronchodilatator FEV1/FVC < 70%, evaluated by plethysmography (Body Box 5500, Medisoft, Belgium) according to the validated methodology [1 (link)]. The exclusion criteria were as follows: exacerbations within the last month, unstable disease incompatible with a PR program, antioxidant supplementation (vitamins, trace elements, etc.) or use of drugs such as allopurinol and N-acetylcysteine within the last month, and use of oral corticosteroids over the last six months. The BODE index was determined to assess global disease severity [7 (link)]. It was determined from the body mass index (B), the degree of airflow obstruction with FEV1 (O), dyspnea (D) as assessed by the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, and exercise capacity (E) measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!