The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lightcycler 96 real time pcr machine

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in Switzerland, Germany, United States

The LightCycler 96 is a real-time PCR machine designed for quantitative analysis of nucleic acids. It enables the detection and quantification of target DNA sequences in real-time. The instrument uses a 96-well microplate format and fluorescence-based detection to provide reliable and accurate results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

27 protocols using lightcycler 96 real time pcr machine

1

DENV Viral RNA Quantification by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from cells using Trizol (ThermoFisher) and from virus in supernatant using Trizol LS (ThermoFisher). A one-step qRT-PCR kit with SYBR green from Agilent was used. Reactions were set up according to the manufacturer’s protocol and run on a LightCycler 96 real-time PCR machine (Roche). The cycling parameters were: 20 mins at 50°C for reverse transcription, then 5 mins at 95°C followed by 45 two-step cycles of 95°C for 5 seconds and 60°C for 60 seconds. This was followed by a melt curve starting at 65°C and ending at 97°C. DENV primers [60 (link)] were used to quantify viral RNA copies in the supernatant as well as in cells. A standard curve of in vitro transcribed viral RNA from a DENV2 cDNA subclone was generated and used to quantify the genome copies in the supernatant [61 (link)]. Copies of viral RNA in the cell as well as copies of SCD mRNA transcripts were both normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) RNA using the delta delta ct method [62 (link)]. For this method: the fold change in gene expression = 2^(-(Infected samples((Ct value of gene of interest)–(Ct value of control gene)))–(Uninfected samples ((Ct value of gene of interest)–(Ct value of control gene)))). The Ct values were generated from the Light Cycler software and the gene of interest was either SCD1 or DENV and the control gene was GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Relative SERINC5 and SERINC3 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular RNA was extracted from 1 × 106 JTAg WT, JTAg S3/S5 KO, CEM WT, CEM S5KO (8), CEM S5KO (11), and CEM S3/S5 KO (9) cells using a Quick-RNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research), followed by treatment with RNase-free DNAse I (Zymo Research). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was generated from 250 ng of all extracted RNA samples using M-MLV RT (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and treated with RNaseOUT (Thermo Fisher Scientific). cDNA was mixed with the respective primer pairs and SyGreen Blue Mix (PCR Biosystems) following the manufacturer’s protocol in biological triplicate and performed using a LightCycler 96 real-time PCR machine (Roche). Quantification cycle values were normalized to a reference gene (GAPDH) and relative SERINC5 or SERINC3 gene expression ratios were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008 (link)). The following primers were used for analysis: SERINC5: 5′-ATCGAGT TCTGACGCTCTGC-3′ and 5′-GCTCTTCAGTGTCCTCTCCAC-3’; SERINC3 5′-AATTCAGGAACACCAGCCTC-3′ and 5′- GGTTGGGATTGCAGGAAC GA-3’; GAPDH 5′-TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAGC-3′ and 5′-GGCATGGACT GTGGTCATGAG-3’.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization and Stability of RNA Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size and zeta potential of our NPs were determined by DLS. To determine the size of NPs, NPs were filtered by 0.22 µm filter and then 100 µL NPs were (20 µM) diluted into TES buffer. To determine the zeta potential, the above NPs were further diluted to 500 µL TES buffer. The Tm value was detected by a SYBR green assay, as previously described [4 ]. Briefly, the NPs were assembled in 1 × TMS buffer in the presence of 1 × SYBR Green II dye (Invitrogen) with final nanoparticle concentration of 250 nM. The samples were heated to 95 °C for 5 min and then slowly cooled down to room temperature at a rate of 0.11 °C/s using the Roche Lightcycler 96 real-time PCR machine. The melting temperature was obtained from at least three independent measurements. As for the stability assay, the 2’F modified NPs or unmodified 3WJ control NPs were exposed to different concentrations of RNase A (0, 10, 100 µg/mL), or 10% FBS supplemented DMEM medium at 37 oC, respectively. The assembly and stability of our NPs was examined through 8% native PAGE gel electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Validating Gene Expression Data by QRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to verify the reproducibility and repeatability of gene expression data obtained by RNA-Seq, seven genes were selected for QRT PCR verification. In brief, cDNA was generated from total RNA using the PrimeScript II 1 st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Dalian, China) following the manufacturer’s instruction. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was carried out with the cDNA using SYBR green on a Roche LightCycler 96 real-time PCR machine (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The b-Actin was used as a reference gene for the standardization of the results. The relative expression levels were calculated as described previously (15 (link)). Three biological repeats were measured for each sample. The primers used were shown in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Molecular Identification of Blood Meal Sources

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were initially screened using bovine and human specific primers developed by Gunathilaka et al. [20 (link)]. These primers were selected based on the abundance of available host species in the area. The reaction conditions consisted of a 10 µl reaction including 0.5 M of forward and reverse primers (Integrated DNA Technologies, Leuven, Belgium), 5 µl of SYBR green master mix (Roche, Welwyn Garden City, UK), 2 µl of nuclease-free water (Roche) and 2 µl of template DNA. PCR was run on a LightCycler 96 real-time PCR machine (Roche) under the following cycling conditions: pre-incubation of 95 °C for 600 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 62 °C for 10 s and 72 °C for 30 s followed by a melting analysis.
Human-positive blood meals (including any potentially mixed feeds) from the above assay were confirmed using the Promega Plexor® HY Human DNA forensic detection kit (Promega, Southampton, UK). Assay was performed following manufacturer’s protocol using a Stratagene MX3005P (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) real-time PCR machine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of ZFL Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For qRT-PCR, ZFL cells were seeded in six-well plates at 1.2 × 106/well. Each treatment was replicated three times. After treatment, the cells were washed twice with PBS, and 1 mL TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was added to extract total RNA, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity was assessed using agarose gel electrophoresis and an Implen NanoPhotometer (Implen Inc., Westlake Village, CA, USA). After removing DNA from the total RNA, cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScript® RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan). qRT-PCR assays were performed in triplicate using the LightCycler® 96 real-time PCR machine (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in a 20 μL reaction system containing 2.0 μL primers (2.5 μM), 2.0 μL diluted first-strand cDNA, 10 μL 2× Power SYBR™ Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 6.0 μL sterilized double-distilled water. The cycling conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, and finally, 60 °C for 1 min. After PCR, melting curves were analyzed over a range of 72–95 °C (at 1 °C/20 s steps) to confirm product singularity. Relative gene expression levels were determined using the comparative CT method (2−ΔΔCt), as described previously [35 (link),36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Klotho mRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from AVICs using the TRI Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), quantified on a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and reverse transcribed into cDNA with iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Gene-specific primers used for the qPCR analysis were: human-KL Forward: 5′-CTCGGGTACCTGGTGGC-3′; human-KL Reverse: 5′-ACACCTGACCTCCCTGAGTG-3′. Quantitative qPCR was performed using a LightCycler ® 96 Real-Time PCR machine (Roche Diagnostic, Basel, Switzerland) using SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The expression of mRNA was calculated as the relative ratio to human GAPDH mRNA, with all data presented as fold change against control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

LAMP-OSD Assay for Gene Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LAMP-OSD reaction mixtures were prepared in 25 μl volume containing indicated amounts of human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapd) DNA templates along with a final concentration of 1.6 μM each of BIP and FIP primers, 0.4 μM each of B3 and F3 primers, and 0.8 μM of the loop primer. Amplification was performed in 1X isothermal buffer (NEB) (20 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 10 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1% Triton X-100, pH 8.8) containing 0.8 M betaine, 0.8 mM dNTPs, 2 mM additional MgSO4, 16 units of pure Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase, and 100 nM of OSD reporter. Reporters were prepared for use in LAMP assays by annealing 100 nM fluorophore-labeled OSD strands with a 5-fold excess of the quencher-labeled OSD strands by incubation at 95°C for 1 min followed by cooling at the rate of 0.1°C/sec to 25°C). In some LAMP-OSD assays commercial Bst 2.0 was substituted either with 16 units of commercial Bst-LF DNA polymerase or with 3 μl (2 x 107 cells) of Bst-LF expressing lyophilized BL21 cellular reagents (rehydrated prior to use in 30 μl water). For real-time signal measurement these LAMP-OSD reactions were transferred into a 96-well PCR plate, which was incubated in a LightCycler 96 real-time PCR machine (Roche, NC, U.S.A.) maintained at 65°C for 90 min. Fluorescence signals were recorded every 3 min and analyzed using the LightCycler 96 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Analyzing Immune Response in Avian Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chicken and cattle macrophages were infected with opsonized bacteria as described above. At 6 h post-infection, infected and uninfected cells were collected, and total RNA was isolated by using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Denmark) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA degradation and purity were assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis and Nanodrop analysis, respectively. After being treated with DNase following the manufacturer's instructions (Promega, Denmark), RNA was transcribed into cDNA using the GoScript™ Reverse transcription system (Promega, Denmark) following the manufacturer's instructions. Transcripts were then assessed by qPCR analysis, which was performed using the SYBR FastStart Essential DNA Green master kit (Roche, Denmark) on the Roche LightCycler 96 Real-Time PCR machine. The housekeeping gene GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) was used as an internal control. The relative gene expression of cytokines [interleukin (IL)1β, IL6, IL10, LITAF, interferon (IFN)-γ, IL18, CXCLi1, and CXCli2] and Toll-like receptors (TLR1, TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR5, TLR7, TLR15, and TLR21) (primer sequences listed in Supplementary Tables 1, 2) was calculated and analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on a Roche LightCycler 96 real-time PCR machine (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) using SuperReal PreMix Plus SYBR-Green (Tiangen Biotech, China). qRT-PCR was conducted as described previously (Shen et al., 2016 (link)), and the relative expression levels were calculated as described previously (Livak and Schmittgen, 2002 (link)). The experiments were performed using three biological replicates. All the primers used in the qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!