The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sureselect clinical research exome v2

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The SureSelect Clinical Research Exome V2 is a targeted sequencing kit designed to capture the protein-coding regions of the human genome, known as the exome. It provides comprehensive coverage of the clinically relevant regions of the genome, enabling researchers to efficiently and cost-effectively analyze genetic variations associated with human diseases and traits.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using sureselect clinical research exome v2

1

Whole Exome Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Library preparation for whole exome sequencing was performed using the Sureselect Clinical Research Exome v2 (Agilent Technologies, CAT#5190) and SureSelect XT reagent kit (Agilent Technologies, CAT#G9642) as per the manufacturer’s instructions from 200 ng of genomic DNA. Samples were sequenced with the Illumina NextSeq 500 platform. Zygosity of mutations within the JAK2 ATP-binding domain were determined by visual inspection of BAM files, filtered by XenofilteR56 (link), using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (Broad Institute).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Copy Number Segmentation with CNVkit

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Copy number segmentation was performed with CNVkit (v. 0.9.6)78 (link). First, the command cnvkit.py batch was used, specifying matching tumor and normal files (where available), exome target regions based on the kit used (Agilent SureSelect Clinical Research Exome V2 or Twist Exome), the 1000 Genomes version of the hg19 human reference genome (v37), and a list of problematic regions to exclude (http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenpath/hg19/encodeDCC/wgEncodeMapability/wgEncodeDukeMapabilityRegionsExcludable.bed.gz). The resulting output was converted to SEG-formatted files using the commands cnvkit.py segmetrics (parameters: “–ci -a 0.05”) followed by cnvkit.py call (parameters: “–center “median”–purity 1–filter ci”) and cnvkit.py export seg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Copy Number Variant Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Copy number segmentation was performed with CNVkit (v. 0.9.6), by first running the “cnvkit.py batch” command with matching tumour and normal files, exome target regions based on Agilent SureSelect Clinical Research Exome V2, the 1000 Genomes version of the hg19 human reference genome (v. 37), and a list of problematic regions to exclude (http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenpath/hg19/encodeDCC/wgEncodeMapability/wgEncodeDukeMapabilityRegionsExcludable.bed.gz). The resulting output was converted to SEG-formatted files using the commands “cnvkit.py segmetrics” (parameters: “—ci -a 0.05”) followed by “cnvkit.py call” (parameters: “—center “median” —purity 1 —filter ci”) and “cnvkit.py export seg”.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Exome Capture and Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA extracted from fresh blood cells from the proband and her father with QiAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen) was captured using Agilent in-solution enrichment methodology with their biotinylated oligonucleotides probes library (SureSelect Clinical Research Exome V2, Agilent Technologies), followed by paired-end 75 bases massively parallel sequencing on Illumina HiSeq4000 (IntegraGen SA, Evry, France), as reported (13 (link)). Sequence capture, enrichment and elution were performed according to manufacturer’s instruction and protocols (SureSelect, Agilent) without modification, except for library preparation performed with NEBNext® Ultra kit (New England Biolabs). For library preparation, 600 ng of each genomic DNA were fragmented by sonication and purified to yield fragments of 150–200 bp. Paired-end adaptor oligonucleotides were ligated on repaired fragments then purified and enriched by 8 PCR cycles. A total of 1200ng of the purified Libraries were then hybridized to the SureSelect oligo probe capture library for 72 h. After hybridization and washing, the eluted fraction was PCR-amplified, purified and quantified by qPCR. Each eluted-enriched DNA library was then sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq4000 as paired-end 75 bp reads. Image analysis and base calling were performed using Illumina Real Time Analysis (2.7.7) with default parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of PDX Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A bionix (60 (link)) pipeline was used to process samples from sequencing data to variant calls. Sequences were aligned to Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 38 (GRCh38) using minimap2 v2.17 (61 (link)), and also to Mus Musculus reference GRCm38. Mouse derived sequences were removed with XenoMapper v1.0.2 (62 (link)). PDX whole exome sequencing used the Agilent SureSelect Clinical Research Exome V2, with reads filtered to 100bp each side of capture regions. Small mutations were called using Octopus v0.7.0 (63 (link)) and annotated using SnpEff v4.3 (64 ). Copy Number Variation was estimated using FACETS v0.6.1 (65 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Variant Calling for Exome Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Variant calling for exome-sequencing alignments was performed with Mutect 274 (GATK v. 4.1.3.0) using the parameters “–genotype-germline-sites true–genotype-pon-sites true–af-of-alleles-not-in-resource 0.0000025–disable-read-filter MateOnSameContigOrNoMappedMateReadFilter”. The GnomAD75 (link) population variant database was provided as a germline resource, together with the same reference genome as above. The analysis was restricted to exome target regions corresponding to Agilent SureSelect Clinical Research Exome v2 or Twist Exome, depending on sequencing batch. In addition, a panel of normals was supplied as input, built from all available normal samples in the study. This panel was built by first running Mutect 2 in tumor-only mode on each normal with the parameter “–disable-read-filter MateOnSameContigOrNoMappedMateReadFilter” and then running CreateSomaticPanelOfNormals (GATK) on the resulting files. Variant-quality labels were assigned using FilterMutectCalls (GATK) using the same reference genome as previously. These variants were then annotated using the script vcf2maf.pl (https://github.com/mskcc/vcf2maf), which relies on VEP76 (link), using the v. 98 build of the VEP reference database for the GRCh37 genome.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Variant Calling for Exome Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Variant calling for exome sequencing alignments was performed with Mutect 2 [6 (link)] (GATK v. 4.1.3.0) using the parameters “—genotype-germline-sites true —genotype-pon-sites true —af-of-alleles-not-in-resource 0.0000025 —disable-read-filter MateOnSameContigOrNoMappedMateReadFilter”. The GnomAD [7 (link)] population variant database was provided as a germline resource, together with the same reference genome as above. The analysis was restricted to exome target regions corresponding to Agilent SureSelect Clinical Research Exome v2. Variant qualities were further assessed using FilterMutectCalls (GATK). These variants were then annotated using the script vcf2maf.pl (https://github.com/mskcc/vcf2maf, accessed on 2 May 2019), which relies on VEP, using the v. 98 build of the VEP reference database for the GRCh37 genome. Variants were further filtered using custom scripts to remove genes with >0.001 frequency in GnomAD, ExAC, and genes with dbSNP identifiers, unless any of these variants were whitelisted. Variants were whitelisted if they were either listed as oncogenes in Cancer Gene Census (CGC) and the exact mutation was listed in COSMIC or if they were listed as tumour suppressors in CGC. The resulting list was further filtered to remove variants that only occurred in more than one PDX sample but not in any patient biopsy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Exome Sequencing of Affected Individuals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples of the affected individuals were subjected to ES of parent–child trios after the informed consent was obtained. Some of their unaffected family members as potential living donors were selected for ES post informed consent. ES procedure and variants annotation have been described in detail previously12 (link). Genomic DNA was isolated from blood lymphocytes and was fragmented to an average size of 250 bp. End repair, adapter ligation, and PCR enrichment were performed following the protocol for VAHTS TM Universal DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina V3 (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China). The enriched DNA libraries were subjected to exome capture using Agilent SureSelect Clinical Research Exome V2 or Human All Exon V7. The resulting libraries were sequenced on Illumina sequencers (HiSeq 4000 or Hiseq X) with the paired-end of 150 bp at Precision Medicine Center of Zhengzhou University. Variant interpretation was performed manually by a panel of nephrologists and clinical molecular geneticists. For clinical sequence interpretation the variants were classified according to the ACMG guidelines16 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Whole Exome Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedures for WES and bioinformatics analysis were identical to the approaches used in a previous study.[14 (link)] Genomic DNA was isolated from each patient's peripheral blood and was fragmented to an average size of 250 bp. End repair, adapter ligation, and PCR enrichment were performed following the protocol for VAHTSTM Universal DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina V3 (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., China). Exome capture was performed on the enriched DNA libraries using Agilent SureSelect Clinical Research Exome V2 or Human All Exon V7 (Agilent Technologies, Inc., USA). The resulting libraries were subsequently sequenced on Illumina sequencers (HiSeq 4000 or HiSeq X, Illumina, Inc., USA) with the paired-end of 150 bp. For data processing, Trimmomatic (version 0.30)[15 (link)] was applied to remove the adapter sequence and reads of low quality. High-quality clean reads were aligned to the human reference genome (version GRCh37) using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (version 0.7.17-r1188).[16 (link)] The alignment sorting and duplicate read marking were performed using Sambamba (version 0.8.1).[17 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Exome Sequencing Analysis of Genetic Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood samples were collected from the proband and his family. A total of 1.0 μg of genomic DNA from each sample was sheared into 200–300 bp fragments, which were subsequently analyzed with a SureSelect clinical research exome V2 (Agilent, USA) exon capture kit following the official guide. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform with a 150PE sequencing strategy.
After removing low‐quality reads and sequencing adapters, the clean data were mapped to the human reference genome (hg19) by the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (Li & Durbin, 2009 (link)). SNPs and short insertions or deletions were analyzed by GATK. Variants were annotated with ANNOVAR (Wang et al., 2010 (link)), and those located in exonic and splicing regions with a minor allele frequency (MAF) ≤0.0001/0.005 in the SNP database (Exome Aggregation Consortium [ExAC], 1000 Genomes, gnomAD) were obtained for further analysis. The pathogenicity of the variants was evaluated according to the ACMG guidelines (Richards et al., 2015 (link)). Candidate pathogenic variants were further validated by Sanger sequencing. All the variants detected were filtered by MAF, and the variant types (exonic and splicing) are listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!