The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bagnoli emg system

Manufactured by Delsys
Sourced in United States

The Bagnoli EMG system is a piece of lab equipment designed for electromyography (EMG) measurements. It is capable of recording and analyzing electrical signals generated by muscle activity. The core function of the Bagnoli EMG system is to provide users with the necessary tools to conduct EMG studies and assessments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using bagnoli emg system

1

Surface EMG Muscle Activity During WBV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface EMG was recorded form the VL, BF, TA and GS on both sides during exposure to the three WBV protocols. Following skin preparations, bipolar bar electrodes were attached to the skin atop the respective muscles (Bagnoli EMG system, Delsys, Inc., Boston, MA, USA), according to standardized guidelines. 33 The ground electrode was placed on the head of the fibula in the affected lower limb.
All participants underwent maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) testing for the four muscle groups on each side in sitting. The hip and knee joints were placed in 90° flexion. For each muscle, three MVCs were attempted, with an interspersed 1-minute break between each attempt.
For each muscle, the peak EMG amplitude of each trial was averaged to yield the mean. This mean value was then used to normalize the EMG data acquired from the WBV exercise trials.
Analysis of the EMG data generated from the three MVC trials demonstrated very good test-retest reliability (ICC2,1=0.85-0.98).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electromyographic Analysis of Leg Muscles During RSA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During every sprint of the RSA test, the EMG signals of the biceps femoris (BF) and gastrocnemius lateralis (GAS) were recorded from the dominant leg with surface electrodes (Delsys, Trigno Wireless, Boston, MA). Electrode sites were prepared before every test (hair shaved, skin lightly abraded and cleaned with alcohol). Electrodes were fixed longitudinally over the muscle belly according to SENIAM's recommendations (Hermens et al., 2000 (link)). The position was marked with indelible pen for the post-visit and participants were asked to maintain the writing visible on the skin. The EMG signal was pre-amplified and filtered (bandwidth 12–500 Hz, gain = 1,000, sampling frequency 2 kHz) and recorded with Delsys hardware (Bagnoli EMG System; Delsys, Inc., USA). The activity of each muscle was determined by measuring the mean value of the root-mean-square (RMS) and the median power frequency (MPF) between the onset and the offset of the first 6 subsequent bursts of the sprint. The RMS and MPF values of both muscles were summed and then normalized to the first sprint value of each condition (Smith and Billaut, 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Wrist and Finger Torques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A custom built device (52 (link)) was used to collect torques produced about the wrist and fingers. The device allows the experimenter to position the wrist and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints separately, in discrete 15° increments, while simultaneously collecting torques about each joint. Participants were seated in an upright position with their hand secured in the device (Figure 1). The participant's arm was positioned comfortably at their side with the forearm parallel to the ground and palm facing medially following stretching and implementation of a muscle hyperactivity inhibition protocol described below (Figure 1). The two distal finger joints were splinted. Muscle activity was monitored throughout each trial using surface electrodes (16-channel Bagnoli EMG System, Delsys Inc., Boston, MA; 1000 x gain, 20–450 Hz bandpass) placed over four muscles; Flexor Digitorium Superficialis, Flexor Carpi Ulnaris, Extensor Digitorium Communis, and Extensor Carpi Radialis Longus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Elbow Flexion and Grip Strength

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Elbow flexion force was measured using a torque sensor (Model: TRS-500, Transducer Techniques, Temecula, CA, USA). The sensor was located in line with the center of the rotation of the active elbow joint. During MVC task, Grip strength was measured using a hand dynamometer (Jamar Plus+; Sammons Preston, Rolyon, Bolingbrook, IL). Surface EMG electrodes (Delsys 2.1 Single Differential Configuration, Delsys Inc., Boston, MA, USA) were placed on the biceps and FDS muscles bilaterally according to the European Recommendations for Surface Electromyography (29 ). The EMG signals were collected through a Bagnoli EMG system (Delsys Inc.), amplified 1000 times. All the collected signals were sampled at 1,000 Hz with a NI-DAQ card (Model: PCI-6229, National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) and stored on a personal computer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isometric Elbow Extension: EMG Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CSPs were examined during three different conditions while the subjects sustained a low-intensity isometric elbow extension contraction with the right upper limb by extending the elbow and pushing against a vertical handle. Surface EMG activity was recorded during all of the experimental conditions from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM), biceps brachii long head (BIC), triceps brachii lateral head (TRI), flexor carpai radialis (FCR), extensor carpi radialis (ECR), anterior deltoid (AD), and posterior deltoid (PD) muscles in the right upper limb. Surface EMG signals were recorded with single differential bar electrodes (Delsys Inc, MA, USA). The skin overlying each muscle was cleaned prior to affixing the electrode over the individual muscle belly, parallel with the orientation of the respective muscle’s fibers. All of the EMG signals were sampled at a frequency of 2,000 Hz. The signals were amplified and conditioned using a 16-channel Bagnoli EMG System (Delsys) with high- and low-pass cut-off frequencies of 20Hz and 500Hz, respectively, before being stored at a final gain of 1,000x with Spike2 software (CED, Cambridge, UK). A single common ground electrode was placed over the acromion process of the right side of the body.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Kinematic and Electromyographic Assessment of Treadmill Walking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pelvis and ankle position data were measured using 4 custom-designed 3D
position sensors. The position sensors were attached to the legs and pelvis
through straps and a waist belt (Hsu et al.,
2017
). The ankle and pelvis position signals were recorded through an
A/D board using a custom LabVIEW program (National Instruments, Austin, TX,
USA).
Surface electromyography (EMG) from 8 muscles including tibialis
anterior, medial gastrocnemius, soleus, vastus medialis, rectus femoris, medial
hamstring, adductor magnus, and hip abductor (gluteus medius) of the weaker leg,
which was based on the report of participants, were recorded using active
electrodes (Bagnoli EMG system, Delsys Inc, Boston, MA, USA). EMG signals were
amplified (gain *1,000) and band-passed filtered (20–450 Hz). The EMG
signals were synchronized with the kinematic measurements and sampled at 500 Hz
during treadmill walking.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation EMG Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electromyographic (EMG) activity resulting from the TMS procedures was collected from the APB and ADM muscles of the dominant hand. A single differential detection electrode was placed over the muscle belly of each muscle. The skin overlying each muscle was cleaned and lightly abraded prior to affixing the electrode. A single common ground electrode was placed over the acromion process of the dominant side of the body. The signals were amplified and conditioned (Bagnoli EMG System, Delsys Inc. MA, USA) with high- and low-pass cut-off frequencies of 20 Hz and 1000 Hz, respectively, before being stored at a final gain of 2000x with Spike2 software (CED, Cambridge, UK) for subsequent analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Surface EMG Recordings and Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sEMG recordings were made using a Bagnoli EMG system with DE-2.1 Single Differential Surface EMG sensors from Delsys, consisting of an 8-channel amplifier with an output voltage range of ±5 V (System noise (R.T.I) ). The sEMG sensor consists of two 10 mm long and 1 mm wide electrode contacts spaced 10 mm apart (Figure 4). The amplifier gain was set separately for each participant to 1 k or 10 k, maximizing the signal amplitude and avoiding amplifier saturation. The analogue signal was sampled with a frequency of 2000 Hz with a 16-bit (±10 V) ADC NI 9215 (Input noise ) using NI LabVIEW 2018. The digitized signal was stored on a computer for offline processing with MATLAB R2021a.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Electromyographic Analysis of Submental Muscles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface electromyograms (EMGs) were recorded from the submental muscles (Bagnoli EMG system, manufactured by DELSYS). Electrodes were placed 1 cm posterior to the genu of the mandible over the midline suprahyoid muscle complex with an interelectrode distance of 3 cm. We also recorded EMGs from diaphragm, sternocleidomastoid muscles as inspiratory control muscles, a rectus abdominal muscles as expiratory control muscles, a medical oblique muscles and lateral oblique muscles (Figure 1). These signals were differentially amplified (Bioamp PowerLab) relative to a surface recording over the left zygomatic arch. An electrode over the right zygomatic arch served as the ground lead. The EMG signal was full wave rectified, and integrated in 50 ms intervals. The measurement was performed after confirming that the impedance test built in the electromyograph was cleared. The data measured from the electromyograph was A/D converted at a sampling frequency of 1 kHz and loaded into an analysis computer. The waveform analysis was carried out using myoelectric analysis software. The bandpass filter was set to between 10 and 500 Hz. At the peak of muscle activity, rest was taken as the zero reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Passive Arm Muscle Activation Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electromyographic (EMG) signals were recorded with the Bagnoli EMG system (Delsys, Boston, MA). Surface electrodes were positioned on five muscles in the dominant arm: brachioradialis, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, pectoralis major, and posterior deltoid. An amplifier gain of 10,000 was applied, and the data was sampled at 1 kHz. EMG signals were monitored online during the multi-joint and single-joint passive localization tasks and trials with muscle activity were discarded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!