The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss version 15.0 statistical software

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS version 15.0 is a statistical software package that provides tools for data analysis, data management, and data visualization. It offers a wide range of statistical techniques, including regression analysis, factor analysis, and time series analysis. The software is designed to help users analyze and interpret data effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using spss version 15.0 statistical software

1

Hemodynamic Responses to Sedative Drugs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The statistical analysis of data was performed using the SPSS Version 15.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) The intragroup differences of the circulatory variables recorded over the time were analyzed using the repeated measures analysis of variance. Differences in the mean values of circulatory variables and analgesic requirement were analyzed using independent samples t test. The categorical variables in the two groups were analyzed using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Extubation time and ICU stay time variables were analyzed by K-S test for assessing the normal distribution; and if not distribute normally, Mann-Withney U test was used for the analysis. The hypothesis of this study was that there would be a clinically meaningful difference in the hemodynamic responses, extubation time, ICU stay and analgesic requirement between the groups receiving two different sedative drugs. The quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD. A P value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Topo II-α Expression Associations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS version 15.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. Comparison between the groups was performed using χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. The association between Topo II-α gene expression and other factors was analyzed using Spearman’s test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluation of Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data obtained were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and all data were analyzed using SPSS version 15.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The comparison between the control and HIE group was performed by a two-tailed t-test. The paired comparisons among the control group and each HIE group were performed by two-way analysis of variance and the Student-Newman-Keuls method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Sleep Quality Impacts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the statistical analysis, data of each outcome measure were averaged per subject for noisy and silent nights and afterward compared using the paired Wilcoxon test (repeated measures analysis of variance or other parametric data analyses were not feasible because of the small sample size and the violation of statistical assumptions). Due to the exploratory nature of the study, there was no correction for multiplicity, and significance level was set at alpha = 0.1. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 15.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluation of TBLN Diagnostic Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were double entered using SPSS version 15.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc. Chicago, 2007) and exported to Stata 12 (Statacorp, USA). Descriptive analyses were done to depict the TBLN presumptive cases’ characteristics. Sensitivity and specificity of the different diagnostic methods (FNA cytology, AFB microscopy, culture on LJ, & BACTEC MGIT 960) were calculated using composite bacteriological methods as reference standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Survival Analysis of Patient Cohort

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard descriptive statistics were used to summarize patients' characteristics. Median values and ranges were used for continuous variables, while percentages were computed for categorical variables. Proportions were compared by Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, depending on the size and number of the groups compared. Survival analyses were performed according to the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between curves tested by log-rank. Survival curves were truncated at 60 months, since the number of patients remaining at risk was too small afterward. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for PFS and OS. A p value ≤ 0.05 was retained as the limit of statistical significance. The SPSS version 15.0 statistical software was used to perform all the analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Inhalation Technique Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A descriptive statistical analysis will be performed for all study variables. We will calculate the means, medians and standard deviations for quantitative variables and the absolute and relative frequencies for qualitative variables. The 95 % confidence interval will be applied. The analysis will be done according to the intention-to-treat principle. The baseline comparison will be made between the main variables that we expect to be related to the primary outcome using the χ2 test or analysis of variance (ANOVA).
At the first level, the between-group comparison for the primary outcome will be explored using the χ2 test. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and NNT will be calculated. Inferences for secondary outcomes will be made using ANOVA or the χ2 test.
Finally, a logistic regression model will be used for the primary outcome (performance of the right inhalation technique [yes or no]), considering the intervention as the predictive variable and the rest of the independent measures as the possible modifying factors. We will use the usual 5 % significance level (α = 0.05) and the SPSS version 15.0 statistical software package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) to run the proposed analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Replicates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All results in this study were presented as mean ± SD from a minimum of three replicates. All statistical analyses were evaluated by SPSS version 15.0 statistical software (Chicago, IL, USA). Student’s t-test was used when comparing only two groups; one-way ANOVA was used when more than two groups were compared. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Survival Analysis of Clinical Features

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive analysis was carried out using mean ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range (IQR) for the quantitative variables and percentages values for the qualitative ones.
Normality distribution was assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Survival analysis was performed by applying the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Log-rank test for equality of survivor functions. The association with clinical features was analyzed with univariate Cox model of proportional hazards (Hazard Ratio - HR and 95% CI) for OS, and the applicability assumption was evaluated by the Schoenfeld test. A p value ≤ 0.05 was retained as the limit of statistical significance. The SPSS version 15.0 statistical software was used to perform all the analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Pain After Ablation Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was designed assuming that 95% (internal data) of the participants would present pain after ASA procedure. It was calculated that a representative sample for a survey study should include 73 subjects, based on the normal approximation with a range of ±2.5% for a two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI).
Baseline characteristics were summarized with standard descriptive statistics and a descriptive analysis was carried out. The prevalence of symptoms after ASA procedure was estimated and its 95% CI was calculated. The Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the relation between the subjective feeling of pain and age and amount of ablation, and between discomfort and age and amount of ablation. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 15.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and StatXact-8 (Cytel Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!