The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

103 protocols using phase contrast microscope

1

Biodentine™ Wound Healing Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described [31 (link)], 1 × 105 cells/well were cultured in 6 well plates, with culture medium and allowed to reach complete confluent monolayer. Before wound infliction, starvation media without serum were added to hPDLSCs and incubated for 24 h. Then, a wound (scratch) was inflicted by using 200 µL pipette tip, through 100% confluent cells followed by a washing step with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to remove cell debris. Different concentrations of Biodentine™ were added along with a blank control and experiment was conducted for 24 h (1 day). The progress of wound closure was observed by using phase-contrast microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and photographs of the scratch were taken at two different time points; before scratching 0 h and after 24 h of wound infliction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In Vitro Oocyte Maturation from Porcine Ovaries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Porcine ovaries from non-cycling gilts were collected at a commercial slaughterhouse (Jatky Český Brod a.s., Český Brod, CR) and transported in physiological saline at 37 °C to the laboratory. Cumulus-oocyte complexes were aspirated from follicles and matured in M199 medium (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St-Louis, MO, U.S.A.) and 0.8 IU/mL P.G. 600 (Intervet). IVM was performed at 38.5 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 for 12 to 44 h. Oocytes were denuded, washed and stored at −80 °C until use. For evaluation of maturation, denuded oocytes were fixed in ethanol:acetic acid solution (3:1 v/v) for 48 h. Staining was performed with 1% orcein in 50% aqueous acetic acid and 1% sodium citrate followed by washing with 40% acetic acid. Oocytes were observed and photographed under a phase-contrast microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Rhusflavone Inhibits LPS-Induced Inflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RAW264.7 macrophages were grown in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.3 mg/ml glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Cells were plated at a density of 105 cells/mL in 96-well plates and stimulated with 20 ng/mL of LPS for 24 h. The cells were treated with various concentrations of rhusflavone for 1 h prior to incubation with LPS. Five different concentrations (0,5 μg/ml, 1,5 μg/ml 2,5 μg/ml, 5 μg/ml and 10 μg/mL) of rhusflavone were tested. After the incubation period, images of cells were captured under a phase-contrast microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Supernatants were mixed with the same volume of Griess reagent (1% sulfanilamide, 0.1% naphthyl ethylenediamine dihydrochloride, and 2% phosphoric acid) and was measured at room temperature for 15 min. Accumulation of nitrites was measured spectrophotometrically at 540 nm. From the standard curve generated with NaNO2 nitrite concentrations were obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Macrophage activation and viability assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RAW 264.7 cells were treated with a series of I6CA concentrations or LPS (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co). After 24 h of incubation, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetra-zolium bromide (MTT) assay was performed as previously described (Hasnn et al. 2019 (link)). The LPS-treated cells were considered a positive control for activating the macrophages. The morphologic changes were observed under a phase-contrast microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunocytochemical Characterization of Cell Monolayers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photos of cell monolayers, passage 3–7, were taken with a phase-contrast microscope (Zeiss) using ZenLite Software. Immunocytochemistry was performed when cells reached 80–90% confluency. Cells were fixed with cold methanol (Fisher Chemicals) at 4 °C for 10 min and blocked in 5% horse serum (Vector Laboratories) in PBS. Primary antibody incubation with anti-CD31 (1:50, Dako), vonWillebrand Factor (vWF) (1:100, Dako), αSMA (1:500, Sigma), VE-Cadherin (1:50, Santa Cruz), and PROX1 (1:50, R&D Systems) was performed for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200, Vector Laboratories) were used for 1 h at RT. Samples were mounted using Prolong Gold with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Life Technologies) and images acquired using C2 confocal microscope (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Automated Analysis of Bacterial Cell Length

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To see the effect of the introduced mutations on bacterial cell length, pictures were taken with a phase contrast microscope (Carl-Zeiss, Sliedrecht, The Netherlands) and analysed using ImageJ [27 (link)] with the Coli-Inspector plugin (Norbert Vischer, Bacterial Cell Biology, University of Amsterdam). This plugin is able to determine the cell length and diameter of individual cells in an automated manner. From this data a histogram was constructed and the median cell length was determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of ADAM Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ADAM proteins were assayed in paraffin embedded cross-sections of rat testis fixed in Bouin’s solution (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). For antigen retrieval slices were treated with sodium citrate 0.01 M, pH 6.0 and heat until boil. The samples were treated with 3% H2O2 for 10 min, then, to prevent unspecific binding, a standard protein block System (Ultra V block, LabVision, Freemont, VA) was applied for 10 min. Primary antibody against ADAM17 (1 μg/ml) or ADAM10 (1 μg/ml), prepared in 3% BSA in TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-Tween), was applied to the slice and incubated overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber after being washed three times for 10 min each in TBS-Tween. Biotinylated secondary antibody, streptavidin–biotinylated–peroxidase complex, amplification reagent (biotinyl tyramide) a peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin were applied step by step for 10 min each. Afterwards, slides were washed twice in a buffer for 3 min each. Finally, substrate-chromogen solution consisting of concentrated Tris–HCl and 0.8% H2O2 (substrate) and 3, 3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) solutions (chromogen) were applied for 5 min and washed in distilled water. Samples were observed under a phase contrast microscope (Zeiss, Germany) and photographed with a digital camera (CoolPix 4500, Nikon, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii Attachment to Ion Exchange Resin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 5

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii wild-type strain 137c (CC-124) was obtained from the Chlamydomonas Genetics Center, Duke University, Durham, N.C. Cells were harvested in 250 mL flasks at 25° C. with continuous aeration under a cycle of 14 hours fluorescent light/10 hours dark.

A total of 300 mg of the resin beads of the foregoing examples were packed in a 1 mL column. 5 mL of algal suspension with a concentration of 1×106 cells mL−1 was passed through the column dropwise in 1 mL increments. The prepared resin beads were then washed with deionized water to collect unbound cells.

Recovered algal cells were counted to determine the percent attachment to the ion exchange resin. The cells were fixed in an equal volume of 2% glutaraldehyde and counted using a hemocytometer with the aid of a phase-contrast microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, N.Y.). Cell viability was obtained through microscopic examination by adding 0.2% trypan blue to an equal amount of cell suspension.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Analyzing 4T1 Cell Morphology via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology and confluence of 4T1 cells were analyzed using a phase contrast microscope (Zeiss, Germany) and the AxioVision® software (Zeiss, Germany).
Twenty-four hours after treatment (10 µg/mL), 4T1 cells were fixed using Karnovsky overnight. Samples were washed with cacodylate buffer (0,1 M), post-fixed with osmium tetroxide and dehydrated using graded acetone (30–100%). Then, they were critical-point-dried (Balzers, CPD 030, Germany) from liquid CO2 and gold-sputtered. The cell morphology was observed using scanning electron microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genistein Cytotoxicity Assessment via MTT Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell viability was examined using 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyltetra-zolium bromide (MTT) assay according to the previous method [23 (link)]. In brief, 1 × 104 cells per well were plated in 96-well plates. After 24 h, the cells were treated with the desired concentrations of genistein with or without N-Benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethylketone (z-VAD-fmk, Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA), N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) or LY294002 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA). After 48 h, the medium was changed with fresh medium containing 50 μg/mL MTT solution (Invitrogen). After 2 h, the medium was removed and added 100 μL of DMSO. Absorbance at 540 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Molecular Device Co., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The morphological changes of cells following genistein treatment were observed and visualized by a phase-contrast microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!