The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sterile cotton swab

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United Kingdom

Sterile cotton swabs are single-use medical-grade sampling tools designed for collecting specimens or applying solutions to targeted areas. They feature a cotton tip secured to a sturdy stick or shaft, providing a reliable and hygienic way to perform various clinical and laboratory procedures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using sterile cotton swab

1

Microbiological Assessment of Hospital Kitchen Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Our study was carried out from June 2015 to June 2016 and concerned food contact surfaces samples in a hospital kitchen located in Fez region in Morocco. In this hospital, a private company manages the catering service. It produces more than 1000 meals/day designated to patients and medical staff. The samples were collected once per month and obtained from available materials used in the moment of our sampling (Table 1). Microbiological analysis of the food contact surfaces samples and identifications tests were executed at the Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Fez City.
The sampling of dry and wet surfaces was done according to Evancho et al. protocol (14 ). A prepared sterile template was placed on the targeted area ranging from 20 to 100 cm2, according to the dimension of the surface to be sampled. The surfaces were swabbed by sterile cotton swabs (Oxoid, UK), pre-moistened into a 5 mL sterile Brain heart Infusion solution (Oxoid, UK) then transported to the laboratory in ice boxes (4°C).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Methicillin Resistance in S. hyicus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All five S. hyicus strains were tested for cefoxitin-resistance using disk diffusion in order to indicate a methicillin-resistant phenotype. Disk diffusion tests were performed according to EUCAST instructions (http://www.eucast.org). Strains were suspended in 0.9% NaCl solution at a density equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard and spread in dense lines in two rectangular and one diagonal layer on Mueller-Hinton agar plates using sterile cotton swabs (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany). Antibiotic disks containing cefoxitin (30 μg) were loaded onto the plates. After incubation for 18 h, the inhibition zone diameters were measured upon inspection against a dark background illuminated with reflected light. Zone diameters were interpreted based on EUCAST breakpoints for Staphylococcus spp.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Swabbing Pigs for Microbial Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At each farm, groups of weaning pigs, fattening pigs, and sows were sampled if present. For each group, nasal and skin swabs were collected from five randomly selected pigs by a veterinarian. The nasal and skin samples were collected from both sides of the external nares and auxiliary regions using sterile cotton swabs (Oxoid, UK). Swab samples from each group of five pigs for each site (nasal and skin swabs) were pooled.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Food Safety Sampling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 608 samples were collected from May 2015 till June 2016. They were 300 food samples, 238 surfaces and utensils samples, and 40 hand samples. Food samples were collected aseptically using sterile spoons and placed into Stomacher bags (Grade, UK). The targeted surfaces and an area ranging from 20 to 100 cm2 (according to the dimension of the surface to be sampled) were swabbed by sterile cotton swabs (Oxoid, UK), premoistened into a 2 mL sterile Brain heart Infusion solution (Oxoid, UK) then transported to the laboratory in ice boxes (4°C) [14 (link)]. The biological samples were collected from bare-hand food handlers using swabs as recommended by Evancho et al. [15 (link)]. All samples were obtained during the food preparation process.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All bacterial isolates (53 SS-O157, 6 control O157 and 20 bovine E. coli) with intermediate-resistant and resistant AST phenotype were selected for MIC testing against respective antibiotics using the MIC strips (Etest®, BioMe'rieux Inc., Durham NC). Hence, isolates were tested for MIC against 11 antibiotics, in triplicate for each antibiotic (results represented as average MIC μg/mL), based on the CLSI guidelines [34 ] (). Briefly, four purified bacterial colonies were inoculated in trypticase soy broth (TSB; Becton Dickinson/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL) to reach a McFarland turbidity of ∼0.5 (concentration, ∼105 CFU/mL). The inoculum was spread-plated onto the Mueller-Hinton Agar (MHA) (Becton Dickinson/Thermo Fisher Scientific) plates using sterile cotton swabs (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Within 15 min of inoculation, the MIC Strips (Etest®) were placed onto MHA plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 16–18 h and the MIC (μg/mL), corresponding to the elliptical zone of inhibition around the strip (), was directly read from the strips. E. coli (ATCC®25922™) was used as a control to validate assay conditions and the quality of antibiotics [34 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Wound Microbiome Sampling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pus (Swabs and aspirates) were collected from wounds (traumatic wounds and surgical wounds) during routine clinical work from the period of June 2016 -to June 2017. Sterile cotton swabs (ThermoFisher TM ) were used to collect specimens which were immediately taken to the microbiology laboratory for microbiological investigations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extraction of Microbial DNA from Breast Milk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microbial DNA was extracted from 231 breast milk samples using a modified protocol from the DNeasy Powerfood Microbial kit (Qiagen, UK) (formerly PowerFood™ Microbial DNA Isolation kit, MoBio, Carlsbad, CA) as previously outlined22 (link). Briefly, milk samples were subjected to initial centrifugation of 4000g × 30 min at 4 °C, the fat layer removed with a sterile cotton swab (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and the supernatant was discarded. Cell pellets were washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (Sigma Aldrich) and treated with 90 µL of 50 mg/mL lysozyme (Sigma Aldrich) and 50 µL of 5 KU/mL mutanolysin (Sigma Aldrich) followed by incubation at 55 °C × 15 min. Samples were subsequently treated with 28 µL of 20 mg/mL proteinase k (Qiagen, UK) and incubated further at 55 °C for 15 min followed by using the DNeasy Powerfood Microbial kit protocol. Negative controls using sterile molecular water (Sigma Aldrich) were extracted as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Milk Microbiome DNA Extraction Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Methods 1–4, 2.5 ml of milk was used for extractions and 0.5 ml used for Methods 5 and 6. Microbial DNA was extracted from Methods 1–5 milk samples using a modified protocol from the PowerFoodTM Microbial DNA Isolation kit (MoBio, Carlsbad, CA). Briefly, samples were subject to an initial centrifugation 4000 g x 30 min at 4°C, the fat layer was removed with a sterile cotton swab (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and supernatant discarded. Cell pellets were washed with phosphate‐buffered saline (Sigma Aldrich) and centrifuged at 13,000 g × 1 min at room temperature. A second wash step was performed using the same process. Samples were treated with 90 µl of 50 mg/ml lysozyme (Sigma Aldrich) and 50 µl of 5 KU/ml mutanolysin (Sigma Aldrich) followed by incubation at 55°C × 15 min. Samples were subsequently treated with 28 µl of 20 mg/ml proteinase k (Qiagen, UK) and incubated further at 55°C × 15 min followed by the Mobio PowerFoodTM Microbial DNA Isolation kit protocol. Method 6 used the Milk Preservation and Isolation Kit (Norgen BioTek) as per the manufacturer's instructions with the addition of the optional 2‐h lysozyme step. Two negative controls using sterile molecular water (Sigma Aldrich) were extracted as above, one with each kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!