The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Azurespot software

Manufactured by Azure Biosystems
Sourced in United States

AzureSpot is a software application designed for image analysis and quantification. It provides tools for capturing, processing, and analyzing digital images obtained from various laboratory instruments. The software enables users to perform tasks such as spot detection, colony counting, and data visualization.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using azurespot software

1

Protein Corona Characterization of Quantum Dots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immediately after blood collection, plasma was isolated from whole blood by centrifugation (3000×g, 5 min). Subsequently, QDs (2 μM in PBS) were incubated in plasma at 1:1 ratio (v/v) in order to mimic the protein concentration in vivo (50% plasma in blood). The incubation was done for 35 min at 37 °C under continuous agitation. The protein coronas were recovered after 10 min centrifugation at 15,000×g and washed three times with cold PBS to remove unbound proteins. Finally, the proteins were eluted by adding sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), separated by 12.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and stained by Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB). Gels were visualized using Azure c600 (Azure Biosystems, Dublin, CA, USA). Plasma proteins were quantified by densitometric analysis with the AzureSpot software (Azure Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating mAb3H4 Selectivity and Chicken Serum Albumin Immunoreactivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot was performed to study (1) mAb3H4 selectivity, (2) the effect of extraction buffer (composition and pH) on chicken serum albumin immunoreactivity, and (3) the effect of heat treatment on chicken serum albumin immunoreactivity. The separated protein bands from SDS-PAGE were transferred to a 0.45 µm nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad). After verification using Ponceau S staining, the membrane was blocked using BSA-PBST for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was further incubated with 1 ppm of mAb3H4 overnight at 4 °C, followed by 172 ppb of anti-IgG-HRP for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was washed with PBST several times between each step. All images from non-reducing and reducing SDS-PAGE and Western blot were captured by the Azure c600 Imaging System and analyzed using the AzureSpot software (version 2.0.062, Azure Biosystems Inc., Dublin, CA, USA). For the same model, the relative immunoreactivity of chicken serum albumin was calculated based on the chicken serum albumin band intensity in heated samples compared with their unheated ones.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Fluorescence-Based Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unless otherwise stated, all values represent background-corrected average and error-propagated standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least eight replicate cultures prepared from a minimum of two unique cell passages. Fluorescence images collected on the Typhoon and Sapphire Biomolecular Imagers were analyzed with the AzureSpot Software package (Azure Biosystems). All microscopy images were analyzed with ImageJ. Calibration curves were fit with linear regressions. For the CTG and calcein-AM assays, the linear regressions were applied after a Lineweaver–Burke transformation to account for the enzymatic nature of both assays. Dose–response datasets were fit with a three-parameter logistic fit, and IC50 value comparisons used an extra sum-of-squares F-test. All datasets were analyzed with GraphPad Prism v9.0.0. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Supercoiled DNA Protection Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Inhibition of AAPH-induced damage to supercoiled DNA by each of the three phenolic fractions was examined according to the method of Albishi et al. [35 (link)] with a slight modification. All reagents were dissolved in a 75 mM phosphate-buffered solution (PBS, pH 7.4). Briefly, 4 μL of supercoiled plasmid DNA solution (pBR 322 from Escherichia coli RRI, 50 μg/mL), 4 μL of each sample at different concentrations, and 4 μL of 9 mM AAPH were added sequentially to 4 μL of PBS in an Eppendorf tube. After centrifugation and incubation at 37 °C for 1 h, 4 μL of loading dye consisting of 0.25% bromophenol blue, 0.25% xylene cyanol, and 50% glycerol in distilled water was added to the reaction mixture. A 0.7% (w/v) agarose gel was prepared in 50× TAE buffer containing GelRedTM nucleic acid stain (10 μL/100 mL of gel). Each sample was loaded, and gel electrophoresis was run (60 V) for 1 h at room temperature in the TAE buffer. DNA bands were then imaged, and band intensities were analyzed using Azurespot software (Azure Biosystems Inc, Dublin, CA, USA). Results of inhibition to supercoiled DNA damage were expressed as IC50 values (mg/mL), i.e., the concentration of a sample that causes 50% inhibition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Deacetylase Assay Protocol with Rpd3L Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Deacetylase assays were performed using a model acetylated peptide substrate as previously described64 (link). The concentration of the Rpd3L complex used in these assays were estimated based on SDS-PAGE band intensities of various subunits following Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining compared to known amounts of bovine serum albumin; band intensities were quantified using AzureSpot software (Azure Biosystems). Assay data were fitted using GraphPad Prism ver. 9.5.0 (Dotmatics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Myostatin Isoforms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using standard procedures, clarified supernatants from homogenized muscle tissues or murine serum were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by western blot with the following primary antibodies: anti-myostatin prodomain AF1539 (R&D Systems); anti-mature Myostatin ab124621 (Abcam). Immunoprecipitations with SRK-015, IgG control, or GDF8-C1 antibodies from homogenized clarified muscle lysate and murine serum were carried out using the Thermo Scientific Pierce™ Co-Immunoprecipitation Kit according to the manufacturer’s specifications.
For quantitative fluorescent western blots, samples were loaded onto Any kD Mini-PROTEAN TGX Stain-Free Gels (Bio-Rad) and signal was detected by near-IR imaging (Azure c600, Azure Biosystems) and quantified using the western blot analysis tool in AzureSpot software (Azure Biosystems). Band intensity (number of positive pixels per unit area) from pro and latent Myostatin was measured and normalized to total loaded protein per lane. For all data presented, a minimum of three biological replicates were measured to generate the presented average values, and error bars on all graphs represent standard deviations. Statistical significance was determined by t-test (two-tailed, homoscedastic).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Uterine Artery Endothelial Function Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In a separate cohort of dams (pair-fed control, n=5; alcohol, n=5), following euthanasia, the uterine arteries were isolated by separating the vein, and cleaning the adipose tissues, followed by incubation in either HBS or HBS + PA for 1 min, before flash freezing for Immunoblot analysis. Following sacrifice on GD 20, uterine arteries from each horn were isolated and incubated in either HBS or HBS+10−5 PA solution for 1 min before flash freezing in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until the day of use. Tissues were homogenized using a refrigerated bead homogenizer (Benchmark Scientific, NJ, USA) and quantified using BCA assay. Twenty (20) μg of sample protein was loaded onto 4–20% mini-protean TGX gel (Bio-rad, CA, USA). Following transfer to PVDF membrane, P-Ser1177 eNOS, total eNOS, and GAPDH were probed. Densitometry analysis was performed using AzureSpot software (Azure Biosystems, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Metabolic labeling of small GTPases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells were transfected with myc-tagged WT or SAAX mutant small GTPases. Ninety minutes following transfection, cells were metabolically labeled with 10 μM C15AlkOPP isoprenoid probe for 18 h. Cells were then harvested and lysed as described (58 (link)). Briefly, cell pellets were suspended and lysed by sonication in PBS + 1% SDS. Protein concentrations were determined using bicinchoninic acid Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 23225), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Proteins (100 μg/100 μl) were subjected to click reaction with 25 μM TAMRA PEG3-N3 (BroadPharm), 1 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.1 mM Tris[(1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl]amine (Sigma-Aldrich), and 1 mM CuSO4 in the dark with gentle shaking for 1 h at room temperature. Proteins were precipitated using ProteoExtract Protein Precipitation Kit (Calbiochem, cat. no. 539180), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Resulting protein pellets were suspended in Laemmli sample buffer, boiled for 5 min, run on 12% SDS-PAGE gels, and transferred to PVDF. Fluorescence and immunoblotting images were obtained using Azure c600 and analyzed using AzureSpot software (Azure Biosystems). Fluorescence optical densities of overexpressed proteins were normalized to the optical density of myc-tagged protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Integrase-catalyzed Plasmid DNA Insertion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This assay was performed using the standard protocol described previously24 (link),27 (link). Briefly, 25 nM PFV intasome, 50 ng of 3 kb supercoiled (SC) plasmid DNA (pGEM-T Easy, Promega), 10 mM Bis-tris propane, pH 7.5, 110 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgSO4, 4 μM ZnCl2, and 10 mM DTT in 15 μl total volume were incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. The reactions were terminated by adding 0.1% SDS, 2.5 mM EDTA, 1 mg/ml proteinase K and incubated at 55 °C for an hour. The products were mixed with 5% glycerol before resolving on a 1% agarose gel in 1X TAE at 105 V for an hour. Gels were stained with 0.1 μg/mL ethidium bromide and scanned on a Sapphire Biomolecular Imager (Azure Biosystems). Unreacted SC plasmid and linear concerted integration products were quantified with AzureSpot software (Azure Biosystems) as described previously24 (link),27 (link) and presented in Supplementary Fig. 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SARS-CoV-2 Viral Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified VLP samples were mixed with lithium dodecyl sulfate (LDS) sample buffer (1× final concentration) and heated at 100 °C for 5 min. Samples were loaded onto 4–12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBS-T (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20). Primary antibodies were added to membranes and incubated overnight: anti-N (1:1000 dilution, Sino Biological, Beijing China, 40143-T62), anti-M (antibody cocktail: i. (1:250 dilution, ProSci, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 3529) and ii. (1:250 dilution, Invitrogen, PA1-41160)), or anti-S (1:1000 dilution, generated in house via immunization of mice with purified S protein (BEI Resources, NIAID, Manassas, VA, USA, NR-52308)). Membranes were washed 3 times with TBS-T and subsequently incubated for 1 h with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody: anti-rabbit (1:6000 dilution, Invitrogen, 65-6120) or anti-mouse (1:6000 dilution, Invitrogen, 62-6520). Blots were developed with SuperSignal West Pico PLUS chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Scientific) and imaged using an Azure Biosystems C600 Imaging System. Densitometry analysis was performed using AzureSpot software (Azure Biosystems, Dublin, CA, USA). Purified recombinant S protein was used as a standard (BEI Resources, NR-52308).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!