The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

28 protocols using truseq mrna library preparation kit

1

RNA-seq analysis of tumor samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from tumor cell lines and mouse tumors with the Qiagen All Prep DNA/RNA kit. Quantification and quality assessments for RNA were performed with a Bioanalyzer (RNA integrity number >6.5; Agilent). Sequencing libraries were constructed with a TruSeq mRNA Library Preparation Kit using poly-A–enriched RNA (Illumina). The samples were run on a HiSeq 2500 Illumina sequencer generating 65-bp single-end reads. Raw sequence data and read counts data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database (accession no. GSE145022). The sequence reads were mapped to the mouse genome (mm10) using TopHat (2.0.12). TopHat was run with default. Reads with mapping quality <10 and nonprimary alignments were discarded. Remaining reads were counted using HTSeq-count. Statistical analysis of the differential expression of genes was performed using DESeq2 (Love et al., 2014 (link)). Genes with false discovery rate for differential expression <0.01 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

m6Am-exo-seq and qPCR for Epitranscriptomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
m6Am-exo-seq was performed according to protocols developed by the Shi group (24 (link)). Briefly, mRNA was extracted from PCIF1-KO and control Calu-3 cells using a Magnetic mRNA Isolation Kit. Aliquots (100 μg) of mRNA were fragmented using a Fragmentation Reagents Kit (Invitrogen, AM8740) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Fragmented mRNAs were phosphorylated with T4 PNK (NEB, M0201S) and then dephosphorylated with Terminator 5′-Phosphate-Dependent Exonuclease (Lucigen). Finally, Cap-Clip (CellScript) was added to remove capped transcripts. Of the final uncapped fragmented mRNA preparation, 10% was reserved as input material, and the remaining 90% was subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-m6A antibody (Abcam, ab151230). Immunoprecipitated RNA was eluted with RLT buffer (QIAGEN, 160051456), purified by ethanol precipitation, and prepared for library generation using a TruSeq mRNA library preparation kit (Illumina). Sequencing was performed at IGM Genomics Center, UCSD, using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000.
For m6Am-exo-qPCR, the same procedure as for m6Am-exo-seq was used through the anti-m6Am immunoprecipitation and RNA elution step. The eluted RNA and input samples were reverse transcribed and subjected to qPCR on a LightCycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics) using the primers listed in SI Appendix, Table S4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transcriptomic Analysis of Differentiating ESCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was prepared from three independent cultures of undifferentiated or 3 d and 6 d MD-differentiated parental or cKO ESCs. Poly(A) RNA was purified from total RNA samples (100–500 ng) with oligo(dT) magnetic beads, and stranded mRNA sequencing libraries were prepared as described using the Illumina TruSeq mRNA library preparation kit and RNA UD Indexes. Molarity of adapter-modified molecules was defined by qPCR using the Kapa Biosystems Library Quant Kit. Individual libraries were normalized to 1.3 nM. Sequencing libraries were chemically denatured and applied to an Illumina NovaSeq flow cell using the NovaSeq XP chemistry workflow. Following transfer of the flowcell to an Illumina NovaSeq instrument, 2×51 cycle paired-end sequencing was performed using a NovaSeq S1 reagent kit. Between 13 and 18 million paired-end reads were generated for each condition. More than 99% of aligned reads mapping to the correct strand.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Molecular Profiling of Breast Cancers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The METABRIC dataset of tumor samples included 2433 samples from the METABRIC project14 (link) with DNA sequencing data, among which 480 were subjected to a capture-based RNA sequencing study23 (link). Sequencing libraries were generated as previously described. In brief, sequencing libraries using total RNA generated from frozen tissues with a TruSeq mRNA Library Preparation Kit using poly-A-enriched RNA (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and enriched with the human kinome DNA capture baits (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Six libraries were pooled for each capture reaction, with 100 ng of each library, and sequenced (paired-end 51bp) on an Illumina HiSeq2000 platform. We selected a subset of samples with DNA and RNA sequencing data and PIK3CA missense mutations for further analysis.
The TCGA dataset comprised 695 samples from TCGA breast cancers35 (link), from which we selected a subset of 289 samples with PIK3CA missense mutations for further analysis. Supplementary Table 3 summarizes the demographic features and disease characteristics of the two datasets.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptomic Analysis of Agrobacterium-Infiltrated N. benthamiana

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Agrobacterium‐infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves were harvested after 24 h (T1) or 72 h (T2) and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted as described above and sequencing libraries were prepared using the TruSeq mRNA library preparation kit (Illumina) and sequenced on a HiSeq2000 (Illumina) using 2 × 100 bp paired‐end sequencing. Each treatment had three biological replicates, with each replicate being a pool of leaves from individual plants. The libraries were multiplexed and run on three lanes generating 48–54 million reads per sample. Resulting reads were then quality trimmed where fastq‐mcf (ea‐utils.1.1.2‐806) was used for adapter removal with a quality threshold cut‐off of 20, followed by the use of an in‐house perl script to trim 15 bases of the 5′‐end and remove any reads with N's or mononucleotides. Thereafter, reads were aligned to the Solgenomics Nbenthamiana genome v.1.0.1 (https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome) using Bowtie2 (v.2.2.5). The number of reads aligning to the annotated genes was counted using HTSeq (v.0.6.1p1). Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 analysis with a cut‐off probability of < 0.05. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed using david (Huang et al., 2009) with TAIR10 annotation. The GOplot R package was used to visualise the GO enrichment analysis (Walter et al., 2015).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Total RNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from the RW4 mouse ESCs using the PureLink RNA Mini kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The quantity of RNA was measured using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000c; Thermo Scientific). Samples with a RNA concentration (A260/A280 ≥1.8 ng/μl) and purity (A230/A260 ≥ 2.0 ng/μl) were selected. The Agilent 2100 Bioanalyser was used to determine the RNA integrity number. The degradation level was identified using the RNA 6000 Nano LabChip kit (Agilent). Samples with RNA integrity number > 9.8 were further processed using TruSeq mRNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina) and then sequenced by Illumina MiSeq platform at the Genome Technology Access Center at Washington University in St. Louis. The gene expression data generated for this study can be found under the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus accession number GSE78857. The expression data is also publicly available at the Center for Genome Sciences by request.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Eukaryotic plankton community RNA extraction and sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted with the RNAqeuous 4PCR Kit (Ambion) according to manufacturer’s instructions, with the addition of an initial 1-minute bead beating step using acid-washed sterile 425- to 600-μm glass beads (Sigma Aldrich) to ensure cells were mechanically removed and disrupted from the filter. Samples were eluted in 40 µL of sterile H2O and stored in −80°C. Residual genomic DNA was removed by incubating RNA with deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I at 37°C for 45 minutes and purified by DNase I inactivation reagent (Life Technologies). Some samples required multiple incubations with DNase I. Sample concentrations and RNA integrity numbers (RINs) were determined using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100. RIN values were between 3.9 and 7.4. mRNA libraries were generated with ca. 2 µg of total RNA, using a poly-A selection primarily selecting mRNA of the eukaryotic plankton community, and prepared with the Illumina TruSeq mRNA Library Preparation Kit. Samples were individually barcoded and pooled prior to sequencing on a single lane of the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform at Genewiz Sequencing Facility (S. Plainfield, NJ). Sequencing resulted in ca. 15 million 2 × 150 bp paired-end reads per sample (Table S3). Sequences were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession number PRJNA877830.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation and RNA-Seq of Naïve and Memory CD8+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Naïve and memory CD8+ T cells were generated using the OT-I system as described previously (32 (link),33 (link)). RNA-Seq was done essentially as described (34 (link)). Briefly, total RNAs were prepared using RNA-Tri (Bio&SELL) and further purified using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) in combination with a DNase I (Qiagen) treatment. RNA sequencing libraries were prepared by using the TruSeq mRNA Library Preparation kit (Illumina). 125-bp paired-end reads were generated by using a HiSeq 2500 sequencer (Illumina) with V4 sequencing chemistry. Triplicate samples from naïve and memory T cells were sequenced (around 40 × 106 reads per sample) and analyzed using a MISO-based pipeline (35 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Illumina RNA-seq Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
cDNA for RNA-seq libraries was prepared using TruSeq mRNA library preparation kit (Illumina). Illumina libraries were produced using SPRIworks (Beckman-Coulter Genomics) with a 200- to 400-base-pair (bp) size selection and enriched with 14 cycles of PCR. Library quality was determined by qPCR and on the fragment analyzer (Advanced Analytical) and loaded onto two lanes of 40-nucleotide (nt) single-end sequencing on a HiSeq2000 system (Illumina).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RNA-seq analysis of OSMI-2 and TMG treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells in fresh media (changed 3 h before treatment) were treated either with compounds or DMSO for 2.0 or 6.0 h. Cells were washed and collected as indicated in the western blotting section. At the indicated time point, total RNA from OSMI-2 /DMSO samples (DMSO in triplicates and OSMI-2 in duplicates) and TMG/DMSO samples (DMSO in triplicates and TMG in triplicates) were isolated using Trizol (ThermoFisher) or RNeasy Plus kit (Qiagen) respectively, according to manufacturer's directions. In Trizol isolated total RNA, Turbo DNase (ThermoFisher) was added to remove residual DNA. Agilent Bioanalyzer was used to determine RNA quality and integrity before isolation of poly(A)+ RNA. A total of 2 μg of RNA was used for subsequent steps. The TruSeq Stranded mRNA library preparation kit (Illumina) was used according to manufacturer's instructions for a poly(A)+-based mRNA enrichment. The fragmentated mRNA samples were subjected to cDNA synthesis and library generation using the TruSeq mRNA library preparation kit (Illumina). Sequencing was performed with a NextSeq sequencer (Illumina) for paired end reads of ∼75 bp. Control, OSMI-2, and TMG-treated RNA-seq data is available from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA; GSE138783).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!