The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using teicoplanin

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the disc diffusion method according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [13 ]. We determined the susceptibility to clindamycin, erythromycin, fusidic acid, linezolid, oxacillin, penicillin, rifampicin, teicoplanin, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin (BBL, BD, USA). Isolates were considered to be susceptible isolates when their zones of inhibition conformed to the intermediate susceptibility category for a given antibiotic.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of SAR Bari Strain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility of the SAR Bari strain was determined by a BD PHOENIX 100 instrument (Becton Dickinson, Franklyn Lake, NJ). Data were elaborated by the BD Epicenter Expert System according to EUCAST rules (http://www.eucast.org). The PMIC/ID-88 (BD) panel was used to test susceptibility to ampicillin, cefoxitin, ceftaroline, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, daptomycin, erythro-mycin, fosfomycin, fusidic acid, gentamicin, imipenem, linezolid, moxifloxacin, mupirocin, nitro-furantoin, oxacillin, penicillin, rifampin, teicoplanin, tetracyclin, tigecycline, trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. The Epsilometer Test (ETest) was used for testing resistance to ciprofloxacin, daptomycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, moxifloxacin, tetracyclin, tigecycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin (bioMérieux, Marcy-L’Étolie, France and Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). All tests were repeated on four independent technical replicates. MIC interpretative breakpoints were defined according to EUCAST recommendations. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 was used as a control strain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibility testing was carried out by disc diffusion technique following the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines (www.eucast.org) using 1U penicillin, 30 µg tetracycline, 30 µg cefoxitin, 2 µg clindamycin, 15 µg erythromycin, 10 µg norfloxacin, 10 µg gentamicin, 10 µg linezolid, 5 µg rifampicin, 1. 25 µg +23.75 µg trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and 10 µg fusidic acid (Rosco NeoSenstabs, Taastrup, Denmark). Inducible clindamycin resistance was detected by placing clindamycin and erythromycin 12–20 mm apart (D-test). Brain Heart Infusion agar supplemented with teicoplanin (5 mg/L) (Becton Dickinson, Denmark) was used to screen MRSA isolates for glycopeptides resistance by a spot test; if 10 or more colonies were detected on these plates, E-tests (bioMérieux, Marcy I’Etoile, France) were used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin and teicoplanin [11] (link). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to at least three distinct antimicrobial classes or being MRSA [12] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Staphylococci

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Resistance to methicillin was primary tested using disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar (Oxoid, UK), with oxacillin and cefoxitin discs (Becton Dickinson, Germany) and confirmed by the detection of mecA gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Barski et al. 1996 (link)). The susceptibility to antimicrobial agents was determined by the disc diffusion method according to recommendations given by Hryniewicz et al. (2005 ) and the CLSI guidelines (2006 ). The antibiotics tested were the following: penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, co-trimoxazole, tetracycline, gentamicin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, fusidic acid, rifampicin, linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, chloramphenicol (Becton Dickinson, Germany), and mupirocin (Oxoid, UK). For all the isolates beta-lactamase production was checked by nitrocefin test (Becton Dickinson, Germany). For isolates identified as resistant to erythromycin, but susceptible to clindamycin, D-test was performed to detect inducible clindamycin resistance (Fiebelkorn et al. 2003 (link)). The susceptibility to vancomycin was confirmed by the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) using E-tests, as described by the manufacturer (AB Biodisc, Sweden).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!