The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using ab40742

1

Subcellular RNA fractionation and analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subcellular fractionation was performed with PARIS™ kit (#AM1921, Life Technologies). Equal amounts of RNA from each fraction were subject to RT-qPCR and the results were normalized taking into account the total quantity of RNA recovered from each fraction. To verify the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractionation of the mRNA, RNU6B and GAPDH were used as controls, respectively. The separation was confirmed at the protein level by western blot with HISTONE H3 (ab1791, Abcam, 1:5000) and α-TUBULIN HRP (ab40742, Abcam, 1:5000). Poly(A) + and poly(A)− RNAs were separated using the Dynabeads® mRNA Purification kit (#61006, Life Technologies), using three rounds of selection. RNA enrichment in each fraction was then analyzed by RT-qPCR, using GAPDH and RNU6B as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Drosophila Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein from the heads of ~50 female and 60 male adult flies were extracted using RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and PIs). Three replicates for male and three replicates for female flies were performed for each genotype. After SDS-PAGE using Bolt 4–12% Bis-Tris Plus gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific), protein was transferred to PVDF membrane (0.45-µm pore size, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the TE 22 Mighty Small Transfer Unit (Amersham Biosciences). Membranes were blocked with casein blocking buffer (1% Hammersten casein, 20 mM Tris-HCl, and 137 mM NaCl) for 1 hr, then incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C, followed by secondary antibody for 1 hr at RT. Unbound antibody was washed away with TBS-T or TBS (3× for 5 min). α-tubulin was used as an internal control. The following commercially available antibodies were used: anti-CaM (Abcam Cat# ab45689, RRID:AB_725815, diluted 1/500), anti-α-tubulin (Abcam Cat# ab40742, RRID:AB_880625, diluted 1/5000), goat anti-rabbit StarBright Blue 700 (Bio-Rad Cat# 12004161, RRID:AB_2721073, diluted 1/5000), and goat anti-mouse StarBright Blue 520 (Bio-Rad, 12005867, diluted 1/5000). Blots were imaged using the Chemidoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ABIN-1 Regulation and Signaling Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies: ABIN-1 (SC134660, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz CA or 4664, Cell Signaling, Beverly MA), IκBα (SC371, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), α-tubulin (ab40742, Abcam, Cambridge MA) and β-actin (ab49900, Abcam). Secondary Abs were from Thermofisher. Inhibitors: MG132 (474790–100UG, 20μM), staurosporine (569396, 100nM), and IKK inhibitor VII (401486–1MG, 10µM EMD Millipore-Sigma, Billerica MA).
HEK293T cells were cultured in DMEM and ST2 cells and MEFs were cultured in α-MEM (Sigma, St Louis MO) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) with L-glutamine and antibiotics (Invitrogen). Transfections were performed with Fugene HD (Promega, Madison WI) or Lipojet (SignaGen, Rockville MD). Plasmids expressing ABIN-1, the ABIN-1 promoter and the Lcn2 promoter were previously described (13 (link)–15 (link)). Luciferase assays were performed as described (7 , 14 (link)). SiRNAs were from Dharmacon (GE, Lafayette CO): Tnip1 (ABIN-1) (L-047652–01), TNFαip3 (A20) (L-058907–02) and non-targeting mock (D-001810–10-20). siRNA transfections were performed 48 h prior to stimulation. In all cases efficiency of knockdown was confirmed by qPCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Cell Death and Cytokine Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell death was quantified by measuring LDH release to the supernatant, using the LDH cytotoxicity detection kit (Takara, Clontech). To normalize for spontaneous cell lysis, the percentage of cell death was calculated as follows: (LDHsample – LDHnegative control)/(LDHpositive control – LDHnegative control) × 100. PI influx measurement was performed as previously described46 (link). The levels of IL-18 were measured by ELISA (R&D Sytems), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For western blotting analysis, cell lysates were prepared and supernatants were precipitated. Mouse anti-caspase-4 4B9 (ADI-AAM-114-E, Enzo Life Sciences, 1:750), rabbit anti-GSDMD (ab210070, abcam, 1:1000), rabbit anti-GBP1 (ab121039, abcam, 1:1000), mouse anti-GAPDH (AM4300, Thermo Scientific, 1:1000), mouse anti-V5 (R960-25, Thermo Scientific, 1:2000), mouse anti-GFP (632381, Clonetech, clone JL-8, 1:5000), mouse anti-HA (ENZ-ABS-118-0200, Enzo Life Sciences, 1:2000), mouse anti-tubulin (ab40742, Abcam, 1:2000) were used and detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000, Southern Biotech).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fluorescent Cell Line Generation and Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa and hTERT RPE-1 cells were maintained under standard tissue conditions (Schmidt et al., 2012 (link)). Cells expressing fluorescent tag fusions of Centrin (CETN1), CENP-A, PICH, Ska1 wild type or ΔMTBD (Schmidt et al., 2012 (link)) were generated using retroviral infection of cells with pBABE–based vectors as previously described (Cheeseman et al., 2004 (link)). CRISPR/cas9 mediated knock out cells were generated by co-transfection of px330 (Cong et al., 2013 (link)) targeting KID (GCAGAGGCGACGCGAGATGG) or KIF4A (GCTCTCCGGGCACGAAGGAA) with CS2+mCherry (1:10) using Fugene HD according to manufacturer’s instructions and sorting for single cells using mCherry signal after 2 days. Clones were verified via Western blotting using antibodies (Abcam) against KID (1:1000, ab69824) or KIF4A (1:2000, ab124903) and α-tubulin (1:2000, ab40742). For a list of cell lines used in this study, see Supplemental Experimental Procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Cardiac Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cardiac muscle (25–50 mg) was homogenized as previously reported [22 (link)] and 5μg of homogenate loaded for SDS-PAGE. Proteins were separated on a 6%, 7.5%, 10% or 12% resolving gel as required to optimize for MW separation, and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Roche, Laval, QC, CA). The following commercially available antibodies were used: total OXPHOS antibody cocktail (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, ab110413, 1:500,), eNOS (Abcam, ab5589, 1:1000), VEGF (Abcam, ab46154, 1:1000), HIF1α (Abcam, ab463, 1:1000), alpha tubulin (Abcam, ab40742, 1:5000), muscle RING finger protein-1 (MuRF1; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA, sc-32920, 1:500), Muscle atrophy F-box (MAFbx; Santa Cruz, sc33782, 1:500), forkhead transcription factor-3a, Serine residue 253 (FOXO3a Ser253; Abcam, ab47285, 1:500), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP; Abcam, ab180649, 1:500), BNP (Abcam, ab19645, 1:500) and beta-myosin heavy chain (β-MHC; Abcam, ab172967, 1:2000). All samples were detected from the same Western blot by cutting gels and transferring onto a single membrane to limit variability. Equal loading of protein was verified using Ponceau staining as well as constant alpha tubulin. All blots were quantified using enhanced chemiluminescence (Perkin Elmer, Woodbridge, ON, CA) and quantified by densitometry (Alpha Innotech Fluorchem HD2, Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, ON, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Cell Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For western blotting analysis, cells were lysed in 66 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 2% SDS, 10 mM DTT, NuPage LDS sample buffer (Thermo Fisher). When mentioned, supernatants were precipitated with methanol and chloroform, using standard methods, and combined with the cell lysates. Proteins were separated on 4–15% polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane using Transblot Turbo (Bio-Rad). The antibodies used were: anti-mouse GSDMD (EPR19828; Abcam; 1:1,000), anti-mouse NINJ1 monoclonal antibody (rabbit IgG2b clone 25; a gift from Genentech; 1:8,000), anti-human caspase-4 (ADI-AAM-114-E; Enzo Life Sciences; 1:1,000), anti-V5 (46-0705; Invitrogen; 1:2,000) and mouse anti-tubulin (ab40742; Abcam; 1:2,000). Purified human NINJ1 was detected using mouse anti-human NINJ1 (610777; BD Transduction Laboratories; 1:1,000). Primary antibodies were detected with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (4030-05; Southern Biotech; 1:5,000), HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse (1034-05; Southern Biotech; 1:5,000 or 12–349; MilliporeSigma; 1:2,000) secondary antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunoblotting analysis of inflammasome activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U937 were seeded at a density of 4 × 105 cells/well and stimulated as indicated in the figure legends. After stimulation, the cells were lysed using pre-heated NuPage LDS sample buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 66 mM tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 2% SDS, and 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). Cell supernatants were also collected, precipitated using methanol and chloroform, and combined with cell lysates. Proteins were separated using 12% polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto a PVDF membrane using Trans-Blot Turbo (Bio-Rad). The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-cleaved IL-1β (83186, CST; 1:1,000), mouse anti-IL-1β (12242, CST; 1:1,000), rabbit anti-GSDMD (ab210070; 1:1,000; Abcam), rabbit anti-cleaved N-terminal GSDMD (ab215203; 1:1,000; Abcam), mouse anti-caspase-1 (clone Bally-1 AG-20B-0048-C100; 1:1,000; AdipoGen), mouse anti-mCherry (ab125096; 1:2,000; Abcam), and HRP-conjugated mouse anti-tubulin (ab40742; 1:5,000; Abcam). Secondary antibodies conjugated to HRP (1:10,000; Southern Biotech) were used for the chemiluminescent detection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Subcellular Fractionation and RNA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subcellular fractionation was performed with a PARIS™ kit (#AM1921, Life Technologies) as previously described [27 ]. Equal amounts of RNA from each fraction were subjected to RT‐qPCR, and the results were calculated using the comparative Ct method 2(ΔCt) and shown as a percentage, considering the total quantity of RNA recovered from each fraction. To verify the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractionation of the mRNA, RNU6B and GAPDH were used as controls, respectively. The separation was confirmed at the protein level by western blot with HISTONE H3 (#ab1791, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, 1 : 5000) and α‐TUBULIN HRP (#ab40742, Abcam, 1 : 5000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fluorescent Cell Line Generation and Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa and hTERT RPE-1 cells were maintained under standard tissue conditions (Schmidt et al., 2012 (link)). Cells expressing fluorescent tag fusions of Centrin (CETN1), CENP-A, PICH, Ska1 wild type or ΔMTBD (Schmidt et al., 2012 (link)) were generated using retroviral infection of cells with pBABE–based vectors as previously described (Cheeseman et al., 2004 (link)). CRISPR/cas9 mediated knock out cells were generated by co-transfection of px330 (Cong et al., 2013 (link)) targeting KID (GCAGAGGCGACGCGAGATGG) or KIF4A (GCTCTCCGGGCACGAAGGAA) with CS2+mCherry (1:10) using Fugene HD according to manufacturer’s instructions and sorting for single cells using mCherry signal after 2 days. Clones were verified via Western blotting using antibodies (Abcam) against KID (1:1000, ab69824) or KIF4A (1:2000, ab124903) and α-tubulin (1:2000, ab40742). For a list of cell lines used in this study, see Supplemental Experimental Procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!