The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mce 202 multina

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan

The MCE-202 MultiNA is a capillary electrophoresis system for automated nucleic acid analysis. It is capable of analyzing DNA, RNA, and small fragments. The system provides fast and reliable results for a variety of applications, including quality control, fragment analysis, and gene expression studies.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

49 protocols using mce 202 multina

1

Detecting RGEN-Induced Mutations using Heteroduplex Mobility Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heteroduplex mobility assay (HMA) was performed to detect RGEN-induced mutations (Ansai et al., 2014 (link); Chen et al., 2012 (link); Ota et al., 2013 (link)). A 146-bp fragment containing the entire genomic target sequence of the DJ-1 gene was amplified using primers DJ1-FW2 and DJ1-RV2 (supplementary material Table S1). The reaction mixture contained 1 µL of genomic DNA as template, 1× PCR buffer for KOD FX, 0.4 mM of each dNTP, 0.2 µM of each primer, and 0.05 unit of KOD FX (Toyobo) in a total volume of 10 µL. The cycling conditions were as follows: one cycle at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 98°C for 10 sec, 56°C for 20 sec, and 68°C for 20 sec. The resulting amplicons were analyzed using a microchip electrophoresis system (MCE-202 MultiNA; Shimazu) with the DNA-500 reagent kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genome Editing in Medaka Fish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Template DNA for the synthesis of single guide RNA (sgRNA) was PCR amplified from the sgRNA expression vector (pDR274; Addgene plasmid 42,250) with the forward primer TAA​TAC​GAC​TCA​CTA​TAG​GAC​CTC​GGT​GCC​AGG​CGA​GGT​TTT​AGA​GCT​AGA​AAT​AGC and the reverse primer AAA​AGC​ACC​GAC​TCG​GTG​CC. Amplified DNA was purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN). Purified DNA was used as a template, and the AmpliScribe T7-Flash Transcription Kit (Epicentre) was used to synthesize the sgRNA. The Cas9 expression vector (hCas9; gifted by Professor Zhang of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology) was linearized with NotI, and the capped Cas9 mRNA was synthesized using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE SP6 Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Both RNAs were purified using the RNeasy MinElute Cleanup Kit (QIAGEN). A mixed solution of the sgRNA (50 ng/µL) and Cas9 mRNA (100 ng/µL) were microinjected into one-cell stage embryos using a fine glass needle. NRF2 mutant medaka were genotyped using PCR primers 5′-GTG​CAC​AAT​GGC​TTC​CAA​CTC-3′ and 5′-GGG​AGG​ATG​GGT​TTT​GTG​TGA-3′, and amplicons were analyzed on a microchip electrophoresis system (MCE-202 MultiNA; Shimazu). Mutant alleles were identified by heteroduplex mobility assay and direct sequencing of the PCR product (63 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Cell Mutations via PCR and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate mutations introduced in transfected human cells, a region of about 400 bp surrounding the target locus of gRNA was amplified by short-range PCR using a PCR kit as described above. In heteroduplex mobility assay (HMA), the PCR fragments were analyzed directly using a microchip electrophoresis system with MCE202 MultiNA (Shimazu). PCR amplicons were also cloned into the TA cloning vector (TaKaRa) to determine their sequences by the Sanger method. All primers used for short-range PCRs used in the mutation analyses are listed in Supplementary Table S4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genomic PCR and Screening of Knock-in Medaka

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small pieces of tail fin were cut and added to 20 µL lysis buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl, 0.2 M NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 5 mM EDTA). After 5 min incubation at 95°C, 80 µL H2O were added. After centrifugation, 1-µL aliquots of supernatant were used for genomic PCR with KOD FX Neo (TOYOBO) and appropriate primers (Table 4). Candidate G0 fish were crossed with wild-type counterparts, and fertilized eggs were analyzed for fluorescence of RCC1-mCh or RCC1-mACF, 1 or 2 days after fertilization. Genomic DNA was extracted from some fluorescence-positive F1 embryos, and genomic PCR was performed. Proper knock-in of the construct was confirmed by direct sequencing of PCR products. Other positive embryos from the same G0 fish were reared, and F1 male and female fish were mated to obtain a homozygous F2 generation. PCR products were analyzed by normal gel electrophoresis or using an automatic microchip electrophoresis system (MCE-202 MultiNA: Shimazu, Kyoto, Japan).
To select the EGFP-α-tubulin knock-in strain (Supplementary Fig. 1b), embryos with EGFP fluorescence in their eyes and throughout their bodies were raised as G0 founders and were crossed with wild-type medaka to obtain a stable F1 transgenic line. Insertion of the KI vector at the target site was examined by PCR using specific primers for the KI vector and the promoter of α-tubulin (upstream of gRNA target site).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ultra-Fast Real-Time PCR with EvaGreen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UF-PCR, which is based on the same principle as that of SYBR Green qPCR, was used by replacing SYBR Green with EvaGreen as an intercalating dye (Shin et al., 2022 (link)). PCR analysis was performed using a GENECHECKER UF-150 Ultra-fast Real-Time PCR system (Genesystem, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) with Rapi:chip. The final reaction volume was 10 µL consisting of 5 µL SSO Fast EvaGreen Supermixes (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Berkeley, CA, USA), 1 µL each of forward and reverse primers (0.8 µM), and 2 µL DNA template (50 ng). All PCR reactions were performed under the following conditions: one cycle of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 s, annealing at 54 °C for 5 s, extension at 72 °C for 5 s, and one cycle of elongation at 72 °C for 5 s. No template control (NTC) was used as a negative control. The amplicons were analyzed using a microchip electrophoresis system, MCE-202 MultiNA (Shimazu, Nishinokyo, Kyoto, Japan) with MultiNA software v1.12 (Shimazu).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Amplification and Analysis of CjChlI Target Sites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 215 bp fragment containing the target sites of CjChlI was amplified using primers p#468_f and p#469_r (Supplementary Table S1). PCR amplification was performed under the following conditions: 94 °C for 2 min; 40 cycles at 98 °C for 10 s, 65 °C for 30 s, and 68 °C for 20 s; and final extension at 68 °C for 7 min. To ensure full heteroduplex formation, a denaturation and re-annealing procedure was performed on the PCR products as follows: 95 °C for 5 min; 95–85 °C, ramping at − 2 °C/s; and 85–25 °C at − 0.1 °C. Reannealed products were analyzed using a microchip electrophoresis system (MCE-202 MultiNA, Shimazu, Kyoto, Japan) with the DNA-500 reagent kit (Shimazu).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Precise CRISPR Mutation Rate Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 285-bp fragment including the genomic target sequence of the sgRNA was amplified using the primers DJ1-FW2 and DJ1-RV1 (supplementary material Table S1). The reaction mixture contained 2 µL of genomic DNA template, 1× reaction buffer, 0.8 mM of each dNTP, 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each primer, and 0.5 unit of HybriPol DNA Polymerase (Bioline, London) in a total volume of 20 µL. The cycling conditions were as follows: one cycle at 95°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 20 sec, 58°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 30 sec. The resulting product was precipitated with ethanol for buffer exchange and was digested at 37°C for overnight in 10 µL of the solution containing 1× L buffer and 2 units of the AluI restriction enzyme. After inactivation at 80°C for 10 min, the digested fragments were analyzed using a microchip electrophoresis system (MCE-202 MultiNA; Shimazu) with the DNA-500 reagent kit. The molar concentrations of both digested and undigested fragments were quantified using the MultiNA Viewer software. The mutation rate was calculated as the ratio of the undigested fragment to the sum of the undigested fragment and the larger digested fragment as described previously (Ansai et al., 2013 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PCR Amplification and Analysis of CjChlI Target Sites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 215 bp fragment containing the target sites of CjChlI was ampli ed using primers p#468_f and p#469_r (Supplementary Table S1). PCR ampli cation was performed under the following conditions: 94 °C for 2 min; 40 cycles at 98 °C for 10 s, 65 °C for 30 s, and 68 °C for 20 s; and nal extension at 68 °C for 7 min.
To ensure full heteroduplex formation, a denaturation and re-annealing procedure was performed on the PCR products as follows: 95 °C for 5 min; 95 °C to 85 °C, ramping at -2 °C/s; and 85 °C to 25 °C at -0.1 °C. Reannealed products were analyzed using a microchip electrophoresis system (MCE-202 MultiNA, Shimazu, Kyoto, Japan) with the DNA-500 reagent kit (Shimazu).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Biotyping of LAB and Yeasts via RAPD-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA of LAB and yeasts was extracted as described above. Biotyping of LAB was carried out through Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR using primers P4, P7 (De Angelis et al., 2001 (link)), and M13 (Siragusa et al., 2009 (link)). Yeasts were biotyped through RAPD-PCR using primers M13m and RP11 (Del Bove et al., 2009 (link)). RAPD-PCR profiles were acquired by the microchip electrophoresis system MCE-202 MultiNA (Shimadzu Italia s.r.l., Milano, Italy), as previously described (Minervini et al., 2016 (link)). The similarity of the electrophoretic profiles was evaluated by the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient (r) and using the Unweighted Paired Group Mathematic Average (UPGMA) algorithm. Identification of bacterial and yeast strains was performed as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genotyping of Abca1 and Dmy genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genotypes were confirmed by PCR using genomic DNA (gDNA). gDNA was extracted, as described previously [31 (link)]. The DNA fragments containing each target site were amplified by PCR using KOD-FX and specific primers (Abca1a: 5’-TACTAGATAACATTGAGGCAG-3’ and 5’-GCTGCGGAGTATAAGTCGCAC-3’; Abca1b: 5’-TGTGCATTGAGGAGGAACCCG-3’ and 5’-GTCCTTCCCGAGGATGTAAGC-3’; and Abca1c: 5’-GTTTGTGTGGAGGAGGAGCCTG-3’ and 5’-TCCCAAGATGTAGGCGGTGCCAG-3’) or BIOTAQ and specific primers (Dmy: 5’-CCGGGTGCCCAAGTGCTCCCGCTG-3’ and 5’-GATCGTCCCTCCACAGAGAAGAGA-3’). The resulting amplicons were analyzed using a microchip electrophoresis system (Shimadzu, model: MCE-202 MultiNA) with a DNA-500 reagent kit for Abca1a, Abca1b, and Abca1c or 1% agarose electrophoresis for Dmy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!