The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

201 protocols using prisma 3t scanner

1

Multimodal MRI Protocols for Longitudinal Neuroimaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As discussed previously, data from the three cohorts were acquired using different protocols.
The immediate rescan cohort was scanned using a Siemens Prisma 3T scanner with an isotropic voxel size of 1.7×1.7×1.7mm3, TE=70ms and TR=2900ms; using a multi-shell protocol, 10 b=0 images and 64 gradient directions at both b=1500s/mm2 and b=3000s/mm2 were acquired. This protocol was applied twice with one immediately following the other without actively repositioning the participant in the scanner.
The short timescale cohort was acquired externally and obtained through the Neuroimaging Tools and Resources Collaboratory at www.nitrc.org. Imaging data was collected using a Siemens Trio Tim with an isotropic voxel size of 2×2×2mm3, TE=85ms and TR=2400ms. Using a single-shell protocol, 9 b=0 images and 127 gradient directions at b=1500s/mm2 were acquired.
The long timescale cohort was scanned using the same Siemens Prisma 3T scanner as the first (immediate rescan) cohort using a different protocol with an isotropic voxel size of 2.7×2.7×2.7mm3, TE=100ms. Using a multi-shell protocol, 1 b=0 image and 30 gradient directions at both b=1000s/mm2 and b=2000s/mm2 were acquired.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Retinotopic Mapping and Behavioral Tasks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All stimuli were generated via PsychToolBox (Brainard, 1997 (link)) in Matlab 2018a and presented via ViewPixx PRoPixx projector (screen resolution: 1280 ×1024 for experimental task and RDK retinotopic mapping task, 1080 × 1080 for object image retinotopic mapping task; refresh rate: 60Hz for all tasks). The viewing distance was 63cm, and the projected image spanned 36.1cm height and 45.1cm width. All functional MRI images were acquired at the NYU Center for Brain Imaging 3T Siemens Prisma Scanner with the Siemens 64 channel head/neck coil. Eye tracking data were acquired using an MR-compatible Eye link 1000 infrared eye tracker (SR Research). X, Y coordinates of the eye positions were recorded at 500 or 1000 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Neuroimaging of Lean and Obese Individuals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The neuroimaging data were acquired using a 3 T Siemens PRISMA scanner with a 32-channel head coil. 1520 T2* images were collected using an EPI sequence (TE = 22 ms, FA = 90o, TR = 2110 ms, 40 slices, voxel size: 3 × 3 × 3 mm) over a time of 54 minutes. Each image was acquired in an ascending fashion. For 31 participants, whose anatomical images were not available in the Institute’s database, we acquired high-resolution MPRAGE images (TE = 2.98 ms, FA = 9o, TR = 2300 ms, TI = 900 ms, voxel size: 1 × 1 × 1 mm). There were 25 participants whose anatomical images were available through the Institute’s database. For those participants the time between anatomical image acquisition and the current experiment was: 3 years for 2 participants, 2 years for 8 participants, 1 year for 8 participants, and images were acquired the same year as the current experiment for 7 further participants. This sample of 25 participants included 18 lean and 7 obese individuals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Functional MRI with Siemens Prisma 3T Scanner

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All functional MRI images were acquired at the NYU Center for Brain Imaging 3T Siemens Prisma Scanner. fMRI scans for experimental, model estimation, and retinotopic mapping were acquired using the CMRR MultiBand Accelerated EPI Pulse Sequences (Release R015a)98 (link)–100 (link). All functional and anatomical images were acquired with the Siemens 64 channel head/neck coil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Resting-State fMRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 3 T Siemens PRISMA scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) was used to acquire MRI data at the Department of Radiology in the Westmead Hospital, using a 64-channel head and neck array coil. Functional MRI data was acquired using echo-planar imaging (repetition time/echo time = 1500 ms/33.0 ms. field of view = 255 mm, isotropic voxel size = 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 mm3, phase encoding direction = A ≫ P, GRAPPA = 2, 60 slices at 2.5 mm thickness covering the whole brain). The MRI scan was comprised of the resting state scan which was first in the sequence and involved the participant focusing on a fixation cross for 8 minutes 12 sec, (only the resting state MRI scan is analysed and discussed in this article, further details of the full fMRI protocol can be found in a previous study by our research group [5 (link)]. Structural MRI data was acquired through a 3D high-resolution T1-weighted gradient echo sequence with repetition time/echo time = 2400 ms/2.21 ms; phase encoding direction = A ≫ P, GRAPPA = 2, inversion time = 900 ms, field of view = 256 mm, flip angle = 8°, 192 sagittal slices covering the whole brain with isotropic voxel size of 0.9 mm3 and an acquisition time of 6 minutes 23 sec. The T1-weighted scan was used as the standard reference image for normalisation in the pre-processing steps.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

High-Resolution 3T MRI Brain Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MR images were acquired on a 3-T SIEMENS PRISMA scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) using a 64-channel head coil. An MPRAGE (magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo) T1-weighted sequence was applied with the following parameters: time repetition/time echo/time to inversion/Flip Angle = 2500 ms/2.9 ms/1070 ms/8°, matrix 256 × 256, field of view = 256. Each scan took 6 min 38 s. Each volume consisted of 176 sagittal slices with voxel sizes 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal Neurophysiological Recordings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neurophysiologic data was acquired by simultaneous EEG and fMRI recordings. The EEG was recorded using a MR-compatible, high-resolution, 256-channel surface EEG system (Geodesic EEG System 410, Electrical Geodesics, Eugene, OR, United States) with a bandpass filter between 0.1 and 400 Hz and a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. The fMRI was acquired on a Siemens 3T Prisma scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) using the following parameters: magnetic resonance encephalography (MREG) sequence (Assländer et al., 2013 (link)), TR = 100 ms, TE = 36 ms, flip angle 25°, 3D field of view 192 mm × 192 mm × 150 mm, and a spatial resolution of 3 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm. The ECG and respiration data were recorded using the physiological monitoring unit of the MR scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Epilepsy Surgery Outcomes Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A surgical data base including patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy undergoing surgery was retrospectively analyzed over a 3-year period. Inclusion criteria were as follows:

Epilepsy-dedicated MRI on a Siemens 3 T Prisma scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) including a MP2RAGE sequence.

Resective surgery, such as anterior temporal lobectomy, amygdala-hippocampectomy and (extended) lesionectomy.

Post-processing using the Morphometric Analysis Program (MAP 18).

Other presurgical evaluations such as video-EEG, stereo electroencephalography (SEEG), and 18F FDG-PET were considered if available. Patients who had had prior surgery were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multimodal MRI for Glioma Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data evaluation was approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg (ethics approval number: S-320/2012), Heidelberg, Germany, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. All patients had consented to the scientific use of their data with admission to our hospital. They received scans using a 20-channel head receive RF coil on a 3T Prisma Siemens scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), following a standardized tumor protocol at the department of neuroradiology at Heidelberg University Hospital, including FLAIR image acquisition, diffusion-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, vessel architectural imaging during preload injection of intravenous gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem; Guerbet, France) and subsequent dynamic-susceptibility contrast imaging during contrast bolus injection, and pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo imaging, see also [13 (link), 14 (link)]. In total, 32 patients (11 women, 21 men; mean age ± standard deviation, 52.5±17.7) with low grade (14 patients) and high grade (18 patients) gliomas were included in this study, see Table 1. HGG patients with a time difference > 2.5 years between histopathologic diagnosis and MRI exam were excluded for the statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

High-Resolution Multimodal MRI Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI data were acquired on a 3T PRISMA Siemens scanner. Anatomical high resolution T1-weighted structural images were acquired using a 3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence with a voxel size of 1 × 1 × 1 mm (TR / echo time (TE) / Inversion Time = 2530 / 3.34 / 1100 ms, flip angle = 7 degrees, matrix size = 256 × 256, 176 slices). Functional images were acquired using a gradient EPI sequence with 3 × 3 mm in-plane resolution (TR / TE = 3080 / 30 ms, flip angle = 90 degrees, field of view = 192 mm, matrix size = 64 × 64, slice thickness = 2.5 mm, inter-slice gap = 0.5 mm, 44 axial slices). 66 image volumes per session were acquired, including 5 dummy scans to allow for magnetisation to reach equilibrium. The TR was chosen to maximize whole brain coverage and to ensure that slice acquisition onset was offset with stimulus onset, which allowed for distributed sampling of slice acquisition across the study (Veltman et al., 2002 ). As inferior cerebellar regions might have been under-represented in previous fMRI studies, we ensured that data were acquired from the whole of the cerebellum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!