The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Polaron e5000 sputter coater

Manufactured by Quorum Technologies
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Polaron E5000 Sputter Coater is a laboratory equipment used for the deposition of thin films onto samples. It employs the sputtering technique to coat the samples with a thin layer of conductive or insulating material, enhancing their properties for various analytical and research applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using polaron e5000 sputter coater

1

SEM Characterization of Glutaraldehyde-Fixed Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following AFM characterization, the sections were fixed for 24 hrs in 3% glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, UK) and were then dehydrated using ethanol series, before being thinly coated with gold-palladium using a Polaron E5000 Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd, East Sussex, UK). Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) imaging was performed using an FEI XL30 FEG-SEM (FEI, Eindhoven, Netherlands) using a 5 kV accelerating voltage. A total of 7 locations were selected at random for each section and imaged at different magnifications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hydrogel Characterization via SEM and EDX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrogel samples were kept at 37 °C overnight to allow for complete gelification for the next step of testing. These gelled hydrogels were then freeze-dried to remove water components. After being coated with palladium (Polaron E5000 Sputter Coater, Quorum Technologies, Laughton, UK), the morphology of the hydrogel was observed via scanning electron microscopy (Zeiss Sigma, Oberkochen, Germany) (EHT = 10 kV, WD = 7.8 mm). EDX analysis was also performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEM Analysis of Adherent MSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted on a Cambridge Stereoscan S90B (Cambridge Instruments, UK). Samples from the Calcein-AM-based experiment were fixed immediately after fluorescence measurements in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.3) (Agar Scientific, Stansted, Essex, UK) at 4°C overnight. Samples were later dehydrated in a graded series of alcohols (50%, 70%, 90%, and twice with 100%) and critically dried in hexamethyldisilazane (TAAB Laboratories Ltd., Reading, Berkshire, UK) for 5 min at room temperature. Samples were imaged with back-scattered SEM, which differentiates between an inorganic bright background and opaque/dark organic cells. A manual count was performed to verify the relative difference in the number of adherent MSCs on each surface. These samples were sputter coated with gold/palladium using a Polaron E5000 Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Newhaven, East Sussex, UK) and visualised with SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Morphological Changes of Bacteria after ZnO-NP Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM assessed the morphological changes of bacteria after ZnO-NP treatment. Briefly, 1 mL of KPC suspension (108 CFU/mL) was used for mixing with 1 mL of ZnO-NPs to reach a final concentration of 0.5 mg/L, followed by cultivation overnight at 37 °C. Two controls (negative control with only KPC with medium and positive control with KPC treated with the antibiotic impenem) were prepared in salt-free lysogeny broth medium alone. After the incubation, the samples were washed with normal saline by centrifugation at 1500× g and then fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4 °C for 2 h, followed by washing with phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2). The samples were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, followed by dehydration through an ascending ethanol series, critical point drying, and coating with Au–Pd (80:20) using a Polaron E5000 sputter coater, Quorum Technologies, Laughton, UK. The samples were checked at an accelerating voltage of 25 kV in FEI Quanta 250 using an SE detector [17 (link),18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating SEM Printing Resolution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Philips XL30 field emission SEM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was used to evaluate the printing resolution and the scaffold morphology. Before the analysis, the samples were coated with 95% gold and 5% palladium (Polaron E5000 Sputter Coater, Quorum Technologies, Laughton, UK). The printing resolution was observed by measuring the layer thickness. The printing resolution was set to 0.1 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Porous Polymer Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface properties of the porous and the nonporous films were studied
using a FEI XL30 FEG scanning electron microscope (FEI, Eindhoven,
Netherlands). MCL-PHA film samples were mounted on conducting aluminum
stubs and were coated with gold–platinum using an Polaron E5000
Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Newhaven, East Sussex, UK)
for approximately 2 min before they were imaged using the SEM. The
images were acquired using an acceleration voltage of 10 kV at a 10
cm working distance at the Eastman Dental Institute, University College,
London.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterizing GelMA Hydrogel Microstructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterise the internal microstructures of the GelMA hydrogels, the crosslinked hydrogel samples were frozen at −80 °C and then lyophilised. The dried samples were frozen at −20 °C and cross-sectioned, then coated with 95% gold and 5% palladium by Polaron E5000 Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK), and images were taken by using a Philips XL30 field emission SEM (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). ImageJ software was used to measure pore size based on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Morphological Analysis of Composite Fibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological structure of the composites was viewed under SEM (Zeiss EVO HD, Jena, Germany). Triplicates of each sample group were cut into ~5 mm squares, mounted on stubs, and coated with 95% gold and 5% palladium (Polaron E5000 Sputter Coater, Quorum Technologies, Laughton, UK). The images of each sample were viewed at the central position of magnifications 500× and 5000×; the fibre diameter was measured and captured using the Zeiss EVO HD in-built software (i.e. Zen 2.5, version 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Modified ESM Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of the modified ESM samples was studied using a SEM instrument (Zeiss EVO HD, Jena, Germany) operated with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV and working distance (WD) of 8.3 ± 1 mm. The 14 mm circular modified samples were fixed on conductive carbon tapes and coated with 95% gold and 5% palladium using Polaron E5000 Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies, Laughton, UK). Images of the samples at magnification of 5000× were taken to visualize the samples (modified protocol adapted from Dubey et al. [27 (link)]).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Silver Nanoparticle Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The AgNP morphology was assessed by means of an SEM instrument (Zeiss EVO HD with eBruker EBSD, Jena, Germany) operated with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV and working distance (WD) of 8.3 ± 1 mm. The 14 mm circular modified samples were fixed on conductive carbon tapes and coated with 95% gold and 5% palladium using a Polaron E5000 Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies, Laughton, UK). Images of the samples at magnifications of 100k, 30k, and 5k× were taken to visualise the samples. The AgNP average size was calculated using ImageJ software (https://imagej.net/ij/download.html, 23 March 2024). At least 50 nanoparticles were selected from different acquired images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!