The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

34 protocols using amd3100

1

Nestin+ Cell Treatment for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mouse model of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was performed by permanent ligation of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. One minute after artery occlusion, the ischemic area was identified and 25 μl of cell suspensions containing 3 × 105 bone-derived Nestin+ cells, Nestin cells, or saline (vehicle control) was intramyocardially injected into the infarcted border zone as previously described [25 (link)]. Injected cells were labeled with CellTracker CM-Dil (Vybrant™ Dil cell-labeling solution, Thermo Scientific) (50 μg/ml) 30 min prior to transplantation. In the Nestin+ BMSC+AMD3100 treatment group, 5 μl AMD 3100 (200 mmol/L, Selleckchem, Houston, USA) dissolved in saline was intramyocardially injected along with cell treatment. To determine the effect of bone-derived Nestin+ cells and Nestin cells on infarct size and endogenous CEC recruitment, mouse hearts were harvested 1 week after MI for hematoxylin-and-eosin (HE) and immunofluorescence staining. Hearts were fixed and embedded in paraffin and sectioned into 5-μm slices. Conventional echocardiography (C57BL/6 mice from each group at 1 and 4 weeks after MI) was performed with a mouse echocardiography system (Vevo 2100 Imaging System, VisualSonics, Toronto, Canada), equipped with a 30-MHz phased transducer. Experiments were conducted and data were collected by two individuals in a blinded fashion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence analysis of bone cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies used were as follows: anti-SDF-1(CXCL12; #sc-28876; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or anti-SDF-1 (CXCL12; #11353; Biorbyt, San Francisco, CA, USA); rat anti-CD31 (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule [PECAM]; #ab56299; Abcam, Cambridge, UK); mouse anti-NG2 (#MAB5364; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA); anti-α-SMA (#ab21027; Abcam); anti-phospho-Smad1/5/8 (#9511; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA); anti-mouse CXCR4 (clone 247506; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA); anti-mouse osteocalcin (Clone R21C-01A; TaKaRa Bio-Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). Secondary antibodies used were as follows: donkey anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to Cy3; donkey anti-rat IgG conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488, and Fab Fragment donkey anti-mouse conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 Cy5 (all from Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA). Recombinant BMP2 was purchased from R&D Systems. The inhibitor AMD3100 was from Selleck Chemicals, whereas the collagenase and trypsin were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pretreatment with AMD3100 Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pretreatment with AMD3100 (Selleckchem, S3013) was performed before the assay. The cells were treated at a concentration of 10 μM in serum-free media (EBM or high glucose DMEM) overnight prior to conducting each assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Investigating PIM3 and CXCR4 Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies utilized included rabbit monoclonal anti-PIM3 (4165), anti-CXCR4 (D4Z7W, #97680), rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-CXCR4 (Ser339, #59028) from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA), and mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (A1978) from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). The pan-PIM inhibitor AZD1208 and the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 (plerixafor) were purchased from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, #S7104 and #S8030).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Latent HIV Provirus Reactivation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A CD4-untouched pre-selection step was performed to enrich for CD4+ cells. Selected cells were then stimulated in 50% ImmunoCult-XF T cell Expansion Medium (Stem Cell Technologies), 50% conditioned medium, 2.5 μg/mL PHA (Sigma), 5 μM AMD3100 (Selleckchem), 5 μM MVC (Selleckchem), 1 μM EFV (Selleckchem), 5 μM Z-VAD-FMK (Selleckchem), 100 IU IL-2/mL (Miltenyi) for 36-40h to reactivate latent proviruses. HUT4-3 cells, as positive control, were stimulated with PHA 24h prior to staining. For optimized conditions ≥2.5X10E6 Ramos cells (CD19+CD3) were added as carrier cells. Subsequently, cells were surface stained for immunological characterization or for assessing Env expression. To detect Env, we used 5 μg/mL biotinylated bNAb mix (3BNC117, 10–1074, PG16, 35O22, 10E8 all provided by F. Klein) which was targeted by an Anti-Biotin-VioBright 515 (Miltenyi) secondary antibody. Cells were fixed for 30 min at RT in PBS 2% PFA. Cells were permeabilized twice with ICS Permeabilization Wash buffer (Biolegend) labeled intracellularly with anti-HIV Gag (KC-57PE, Beckman Coulter). ICS labeled samples were washed twice in perm-wash buffer and acquired on an LSRFortessa (BD Bioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fibrocyte Transplantation for Diabetic Wound Healing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty‐six diabetic rats were randomized into three groups: the NPWT group, NPWT/antagonist group and control group (n = 12/each group). The dorsa of rats were clipped and depilated 24 hrs before the experiment. Rats were anaesthetized with pentobarbitone sodium (40 mg/kg) 5 min. before surgery. Cultured fibrocytes at day 28 were labelled with a membrane‐inserting red dye (PKH‐26, Sigma‐Aldrich) following the manufacturer's protocol. PKH‐labelled cells (7.5 × 105) in 100 μl PBS were injected into the tail veins of SD rats. Immediately, a full‐thickness skin wound (1.5 × 1.5 cm) was created in the mid‐dorsal area of each recipient rat. A medical foam (VSD Medical Technology Inc., Wuhan, China) covered the wound and was exposed to continuous 125 mmHg suction produced by a vacuum‐assisted device in the NPWT group (n = 12). In the control group (n = 12), moist gauze dressings covered the wounds and were changed daily.
In the NPWT/antagonist group (n = 12), PKH‐labelled fibrocytes were incubated in the AMD3100 (CXCR4‐specific antagonist; Selleck) solution of 25 ng/ml concentration in the CO2 incubator for 1 hr and then were centrifuged to obtain pre‐treated fibrocytes. These cells were mixed with PBS, and an equal amount of treated cells (7.5 × 105) in 100 μl PBS were injected into the rat tail veins. Subsequently, wound models and NPWT were performed as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Establishment of Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer Cell Line

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ER-positive breast cancer T47D cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA), and 4-hydroxytamoxifen was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (H7904; USA). To establish the tamoxifen-resistant subline T47DR, we treated T47D cells with 1 μM 4-hydroxytamoxifen continuously and cultured them in RPMI-1640 medium (GIBCO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Beyotime, China) in a humidified condition containing 5% CO2 at 37°C for more than 6 months. After 6 months, the resistance of T47DR cells to tamoxifen was verified by CCK8 assay. AMD3100 was purchased from Selleck (Shanghai, China) and dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Signaling Pathway Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary antibodies phospho-Akt (S473), phospho-S6RP (S240/244), mTOR, raptor and rictor were all from Cell Signaling. Sin1 was from Millipore, Rheb from Bio-Rad, and β-actin was from LI-COR. The anti-mouse-HRP secondary antibody was from Santa Cruz and the anti-rabbit HRP secondary was from Abcam. The mouse-anti-CD31 used for the in vivo studies was from Dianova.
The inhibitors PI-103, PIK-75 and TGX-221 were all from Cayman Chemical. Rapamycin and AMD3100 were from Selleck Chemical and PP242 was from Chemdea. Pertussis toxin was a kind gift from the laboratory of Dr. David Fruman at UCI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Simvastatin Prodrug Activation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The simvastatin prodrug was purchased from (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and was subjected to activation as described by Sadeghi, et al. 20 Chloro‐methylbenzamido dialkylcarbocyanine (CM‐DiI) was purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The PI3K inhibitor, LY294002, was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA), and the SDF‐1α/CXCR4 cascade antagonist, AMD 3100, was obtained from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA),. SDF‐1α was procured from Proteintech Group (Chicago, IL, USA). The inhibitor and mimic of miR‐9 were synthesised by Bio‐Asia (Jinan, China). The reporter constructs, pGL3‐CXCR4 and pGL3‐mutCXCR4, with a mutated target seed sequence of miR‐9, were also obtained from Bio‐Asia. Real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers were designed by GeneCopia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Validating PCa Cell Lines and CXCR7/CXCR4 Inhibitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human PCa LNCaP (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 2005), VCaP (ATCC, 2010), and LNCaP C4-2B (C4-2B) [derived from LNCaP tumors grown in a castrated host 23 (link)] cell lines were validated by short tandem repeat DNA fingerprinting with the AmpFℓSTR Identifier kit (Applied Biosystems) in MD Anderson’s Cell Line Core Facility. CCX771 (CXCR7-specific inhibitor), and CCX704 (control for CCX771, i.e., a close analog of CXCR7 without affinity for CXCR7) were provided by ChemoCentryx, Inc. (Mountain View, CA). AMD3100 (CXCR4 inhibitor) and ENZ (MDV3100) were purchased from SelleckChem, and SDF1 was purchased from GeneScript.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!