The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

46 protocols using lsm780

1

Imaging Differentiated Neurons and Printed Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differentiated neurons were imaged using fluorescence confocal microscopes (Leica LSM780 and Leica SP5) and epi-fluorescent microscopes (Leica DMI 8 and Nikon Eclipse Ni-E). Printed cortical tissues were imaged using a fluorescence confocal microscope (Leica LSM780). Implanted explants were imaged using fluorescence confocal microscopes (Leica LSM780 and LSM980). Images were analysed by using ImageJ (version 2.1.0/1.54c). Microsoft PowerPoint (v16.66) was used for figure preparation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Confocal Microscopy for Yeast Cell Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired on a Zeiss LSM780 and a Leica TSC SP8 laser scanning confocal microscope with × 63/1.4 numerical aperture (NA) objectives using the Zeiss ZEN 2011 and LAS AF software packages, respectively. GFP and mCherry were excited with 488-nm and 561-nm laser light, respectively. Multi-tracking mode was used for image acquisition on the Zeiss LSM780 microscope. Pinholes were set for acquiring 1.5–2.0 μm optical slices. All images were analysed using ImageJ (Schneider et al., 2012) and Zeiss ZEN 2011 software packages. For yeast cell imaging, 5 ml yeast cells were grown to log phase and treated with rapamycin for 1 h. Two hundred-microlitre samples were added to an observation chamber (Lab-Tek #1.0 Borosilicate), which had been coated with 1 mg ml−1 concanavalin A (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Live Imaging of Mouse Embryo Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For live imaging, embryos were cultured in glass-bottomed dishes (MatTek) in an environmental chamber as previously (Kang et al., 2013 (link)). Live imaging conditions used were compatible with normal development as shown previously (Plusa et al., 2008 (link)). For incubation experiments an ERK1/2 inhibitor, 1 μM PD0325901 (StemGent) was added to medium 2-3 hours prior to initiation of 3D time-lapse imaging. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) was excited using a 488-nm Argon laser. Live image data were acquired using three laser scanning confocal imaging systems: Zeiss LSM510META, LSM710, LSM780 and Leica SP8. Images were acquired using 20×/0.75, 40×/1.3 or 63×/1.4 objectives. 20-30 xy planes separated by 2 μm were acquired per z-stack, every 15 minutes. Movies of time-lapse sequences were compiled and annotated using QuickTime Pro (Apple Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunolabeling of Brain Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded brain sections were dewaxed and antigen retrieval was performed as described previously (56 (link)). The following primary antibodies were used for immunolabeling: a chicken polyclonal anti-MAP2 antibody (ab5392; Abcam), a rabbit monoclonal anti-Na,K-ATPase α subunit antibody (ab76020, Abcam), and a mouse monoclonal anti-Na,K-ATPase α1 subunit antibody (a6F; DSHB). Confocal microscopy was performed with Zeiss LSM 780 and Leica TCS SP8 microscopes. For further details, see Supporting information (Text S3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Analysis of RUFY4 Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 25–50 µg of TX-100 soluble material was separated by 3–15% gradient or 12% SDS–PAGE prior immunoblotting and chemiluminescence detection (Pierce). Antibodies used in this study were anti-RUY4 raised in rabbit against peptides 375–391 and 454–470 of mouse RUFY4. Mouse Anti-Myc (9B11, Cell Signaling), mouse Anti-Flag (M2, Sigma), rat anti-LAMP1 (134B, Biolegend), mouse anti-AIF (E-1, Santa Cruz), mouse anti-SDHA (2E3GC12, Abcam), mouse anti-LC3 (2G6, NanoTools), mouse anti-ß-actin (AC-15, Sigma). Secondary antibodies were from Jackson Immunoresearch, Molecular Probes (USA) and from Cell Signaling Technology. For immunofluorescence, cells on coverslips were fixed with 3.5% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100. Images were taken by a Zeiss LSM780 or Leica SP5 confocal microscope using 63× or 40× objective. Processing and quantification was performed using Fiji software [37 (link)]. Co-localization was quantified using JACoP plugin [38 (link)]. Statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad Prism. For two sets of values, we used t-tests, for multiple sets of values one-way ANOVA. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001. MitoTracker DeepRed and MitoTracker Green staining was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Thermofhisher) and detected by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Murine Bone Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly dissected mouse femurs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight. Bones were decalcified in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 10% EDTA and 30% sucrose for 5 days. Bones were sectioned in 12μm slices using the CryoJane tape-transfer system (Leica). Sections were blocked in PBS with 5% normal donkey serum (Jackson Immuno) for 1 hour and then stained overnight with chicken-anti-GFP (Aves), rabbit-anti-tomato (Takara), and goat-anti-LepR-biotin (R&D Systems). Donkey anti-chicken Alexa Fluor 488 (Jackson Immuno), donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor 488 (Jackson Immuno), donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen) and donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 647 (Jackson Immuno) were used as secondary antibodies. Slides were mounted with Prolong Gold anti-fade medium (Invitrogen). To identify CLPs, mice were intravenously injected with 2μg Alexa Fluor 647 anti-IL7Rα (A7R34, Biolegend). After 5 minutes, the mice were killed and long bones were dissected, fixed, sectioned and stained with antibodies against Lineage markers (anti-CD2, CD3, CD5, CD8, TER119, GR1 and B220). Images were acquired with a Zeiss LSM780 or a Leica SP8 confocal microscope. Confocal images were processed and analyzed using Zeiss Zen-2 or Leica LAS X.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Confocal Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal laser scanning microscopy was performed using Carl Zeiss(Germany) LSM710, Carl Zeiss LSM780 and Leica (Germany) TCS SP8 confocal microscope. Images were processed using Imaris (Bitplane), ImageJ, and Adobe Photoshop software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells for imaging were grown in 24-well plates on coverslips. Samples were fixed with 4% (vol/vol) electron microscopy-grade formaldehyde (Polysciences) for 10 min and then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton for 5 min. Cells were then incubated with blocking buffer (2% [vol/vol] FBS in PBS), with the addition of 100 μg/ml human IgG when rabbit primary antibodies were used, for 30 to 60 min and then with primary antibodies. Secondary antibodies used were anti-rat, anti-rabbit, and anti-mouse isotype-specific AlexaFluor 488, 568, or 647. Coverslips were mounted on microscope slides by using ProLong Gold antifade reagent with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Thermo Fisher). All images were acquired with a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM780 or Leica SP5).
For cell morphology assays, HFF-Tert cells grown in 6-well dishes were infected at 5 PFU/cell and incubated for 16 h. Cells were fixed with 4% (vol/vol) formaldehyde for 20 min, washed with PBS, and then incubated with anti-gD (LP2). Samples were then washed in PBS, incubated with AlexaFluor 488 secondary antibody, incubated with PBS containing DAPI, washed with PBS, and then stored in PBS. Images were acquired using the 10× lens of an Olympus IX81 wide-field fluorescence microscope and the Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

High-Resolution Confocal Imaging of Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zeiss laser scanning confocal microscope LSM710, LSM780 and Leica laser scanning microscope SP8 containing laser lines at 488, 561 and 633 nm were used to image immunostained fixed or live embryos. The 40X objective having NA 1.4 of these microscopes was used for imaging. The laser power, scan speed and gain were adjusted with the range indicator mode such that 8-bit image acquisition was in 0–255 range. For both fixed or live imaging, an averaging of 2 was used during image acquisition. Optical sectioning of 1.08 μm and 0.68 μm was used to acquire images at Zeiss and Leica confocal microscopes, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Confocal Microscopy for Cell Nuclei Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of cell nuclei were registered using a Zeiss LSM 780 (and Leica SP5) confocal microscope with either 40× or 63× water immersion Plan Apo objective lens (NA = 1.2). The Zeiss system was equipped with two primary long-pass dichroic mirrors (405 and 488 nm) and a 32-channel GAsP PMT working in integration mode. The Leica system was equipped with an acousto-optical beam splitter (AOBS) and multialkali single-channel PMTs. Fluorescence of H1-eGFP was excited with 488 nm light (40 mW Ar ion laser at 1 % power, unless stated otherwise) and detected in the 490–560-nm range, whereas the fluorescence of DAPI was excited with 405 nm (20-mW diode laser) and detected in the 410–480-nm range. Unless otherwise indicated, the images (optical sections) were registered at 16-bit precision with a pixel size of 0.063 nm (256 × 256 pixels), pixel dwell time of 5.09 µs and the confocal pinhole set to 1 airy unit (at 530 nm). The imaging of live cells was performed at 37 °C in DMEM, with 5 % CO2. Fixed cells were imaged at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!