The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism 5.0a

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States

Prism 5.0a is a scientific data analysis and graphing software developed by GraphPad. It provides tools for data visualization, statistical analysis, and curve fitting. The software is designed to help researchers and scientists analyze and present their data effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

122 protocols using prism 5.0a

1

Statistical Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed with the Prism 5.0a software (GraphPad). Data were generated from several repeats of different biological replicates. Mean values ± s.d. were represented in the different graphs. Except when indicated, data correspond to three independent experiments analyzed in triplicate. To determine significance of differences between conditions Student’s t tests for unpaired samples with confidence interval of 95% were computed. Significance between conditions were indicated with the symbols *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Regression plots and determination of Pearson coefficients and p-value were performed using the Prism 5.0a software (GraphPad). To test the significance of overlapping in Venn diagrams, hypergeometric tests were performed in R, using the dhyper function from the Stats package. Venn diagrams were performed in Venny 2.1 (http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html). GO functional categories were analyzed using DAVID63 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cocaine Effects on Impulsive Choice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences in MAD following saline control and drug administrations were analyzed using a repeated measures one-way ANOVA (GraphPad Prism 5.0a for Mac, San Diego, CA). Changes from saline in the proportion of large alternative choices at each delay for each cocaine dose were analyzed using a repeated measures two-way ANOVA (Drug X Delay; GB Stat, Dynamic Microsystems, Inc, Silver Springs, MD). Significantly different gradients were analyzed post hoc using Tukey's LSD protected t test to determine significant changes in impulsive choice at each delay value. The 15 mg/kg dose of cocaine disrupted behavior (e.g., stereotypy and anorexic behaviors are common following such large doses of cocaine), which resulted in some missing data points, mainly at the 24-s delay. Similar to previous research (e.g., Evenden and Ryan 1996 (link)), these missing data points were replaced with group mean values to conduct statistical analysis. The AUC calculations and Pearson's correlational coefficients between various measures were assessed using GraphPad Prism (5.0a) for Mac. To quantify the percent change in baseline AUC (decrease in large preference) across the cocaine dosing conditions, AUCs of the cocaine gradients were calculated using the baseline proportion of large choices at the 0-s delay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Donor Characteristics and DRI Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences in donor characteristics between groups were tested using a Mann Whitney U or chi squared test where applicable. A logistical regression was performed to test differences in cofactor ratios and DRI between groups. Analysis was performed using Prism 5.0a for Mac OSX (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) and MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA). Data is presented as median (Q1–Q3) unless otherwise noted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In Vitro Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For in vitro studies, differences were determined either with two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) (http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/anova_NGROUP_NMAX_form.html) with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test, or by student’s one tailed t test, using Prism 5.0a software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). A p value <0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Vitro and In Vivo Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0a for Mac OS X (San Diego, CA, USA). A one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post test was used to compare statistical significance in the characterization of in vitro cell proliferation and tumor mass in the xenograft model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Statistical Analysis of Treatment Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as mean ± sem. Analyses were performed using Prism 5.0a (GraphPad Software Inc.). The group means were compared using two-way ANOVA followed by t-test (for 2 groups) or Bonferroni post-tests (for > 2 groups). P values of <0.05 indicate statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Image Analysis of Stress Granules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistics were calculated using Prism 5.0a software (GraphPad). Stress granule morphology and PLAs were assessed by ImageJ 1.46r software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Prognostic Significance of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data presented represent the mean with standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. The statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test and by one-way and two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s posttest; p < 0.05. Patients were divided in three groups according to high, moderate, or low expression of protein target. The Kaplan–Meier (KM) method was also used for OS and progression-free survival (PFS) analysis. For univariate and multivariate analysis of significance, the log-rank test or Cox analysis was used (Graph Pad and XLSTAT). A value of p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The statistical analysis of IC50 levels was performed using Prism 5.0a (Graph Pad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Biomedical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using the non-parametric analysis of variance (two ANOVA) with Bonferonni post hoc multiple comparison test. p value * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001 were considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Prism 5.0a software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Cardiac Remodeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as means ± standard deviation and were analysed with the statistical software Prism 5.0a (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). For quantifications of VEGF expression, cardiac fibrosis and vascularization, comparison between groups was performed with the non‐parametric Kruskal–Wallis test for multiple comparisons and Dunn's post‐hoc test. All quantifications were analysed using the means of multiple individual measurements in each sample (n = number of independent samples). Echocardiography data, which represent measurements from the same animals before and after treatment, were analysed by Repeated Measures anova and Bonferroni post‐hoc test. The normal distribution of data sets representing differences between pre‐ and post‐treatment (∆EF and ∆FS) was verified and multiple comparisons were performed with the parametric 1‐way analysis of variance (anova) followed by the Bonferroni test. Differences were considered statistically significant when < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!