The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statistica 5

Manufactured by StatSoft
Sourced in United States

Statistica 5.0 is a comprehensive data analysis and visualization software package developed by StatSoft. It provides a wide range of statistical and analytical tools for researchers and professionals in various fields. The core function of Statistica 5.0 is to enable users to efficiently collect, analyze, and interpret data through its robust set of statistical methods and graphical capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

73 protocols using statistica 5

1

Evaluating and Optimizing Predictive Models

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The adequacy of the models was evaluated by calculating the multiple determination coefficient (R 2 ), the adjusted determination coefficient (R 2 -adj), the lack of fit and the F-and p-values obtained from the analysis of variance (ANOVA) by using Statistica 5.0 software (Statsoft, USA). The validation of the obtained models was performed by direct comparison of predicted and experimental values obtained for the different responses in the optimal conditions. The optimal conditions were determined by applying the Derringer's desirability function, that identifies a combination of the variable levels that maximize a set of dependent variables, using Statistica 5.0 software (Statsoft, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All results are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD), indicated by error bars. Results shown are supported by at least 3 independent experiments to ensure reproducibility. Statistica 5.11 (StatSoft, Inc.), MATLAB 7.0.1 (MathWorks), and LabVIEW (National Instruments) were used for statistical tests. All p values shown reflect 2-tailed test results, although 1-tailed tests are sufficient when direction of change is known. Significance of survival differences was assessed by Cox-Mantel log-rank tests of full plots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Rigor in Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results are expressed as means±s.d. and the confidence interval of at least three independent experiments (P > 0.95). Statistica 5.11 (StatSoft, Inc.), MATLAB 7.0.1 (MathWorks) and LabVIEW (National Instruments) were used for the statistical calculations. Data were summarized as the mean, s.d., relative s.d., median and full range. The error bars in figures represent s.d. In the selected figures, we only indicated the average s.d. in the caption to provide more clear data presentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Standardized Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and the the confidence interval was determined with at least three independent experiments (P0.25 0.95). Statistica 5.11 (StatSoft, Inc.), MATLAB 7.0.1 (MathWorks), and LabVIEW (National Instruments) were used for the statistical calculations. In the figures, we indicate only the average SD in the caption to simplify data presentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nudibranch Lipid Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis approach was recently described22 (link). Briefly, significance of differences in mean contents of FAs, lipid classes, and lipid molecular species between nudibranch species was tested by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Raw data were used following evaluation of the homogeneity of variances (Levene’s test) and the normality of data distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test). To represent differences between nudibranch species, the variables (square roots of TL class, or PL class, or FA contents) were included in principal components analyses (PCA). All statistical analyses were performed using STATISTICA 5.1 (StatSoft, Inc., USA). A statistical probability of p < 0.01 was considered significant. Values are represented as mean ± standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results were expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. In all experiments, statistical differences between several treatments and their respective control were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and when the F value was significant, post hoc differences were determined by the Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the software Statistica 5.1 (StatSoft, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Effects of Age and Obstacle Height on Gait Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine differences in the mean parameter values among different age groups and obstacle heights for each parameter at the initial contact instant, two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures on one factor was used. To compare means among age levels and obstacle heights for each parameter in which significant correlations with the height were observed, we performed an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) in which height was used as a covariate. Multiple post hoc comparisons were performed using Tukey’s honestly significant differences test if a significant main effect or interaction was identified. A probability level of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. STATISTICA 5.1 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Lipid Profile Comparison and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis approach was recently described28 (link). In brief, significance of differences between mean contents of DAGE and alkylglycerols was tested by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Raw data were used following evaluation of the homogeneity of variances (Levene’s test) and the normality of data distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test). For the cluster analysis, the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean and the Euclidean distance as dissimilarity metric were applied to the percentage content of molecular species of DAGE and four GPL classes according to the structure of their non-polar parts. All statistical analyses were performed using STATISTICA 5.1 (StatSoft, Inc., USA). A statistical probability of p < 0.01 was considered significant. Values are represented as mean ± standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring Algal Photosynthetic Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To monitor the stress intensity caused by Cu treatments in algal tissues, maximum quantum yield of PSII (dark adapted) was measured in one-hour intervals as Fv/Fm using a Walz Phyto-PAM (Waltz, Germany) as previously described [21 (link)]. Since photosynthesis is stress-sensitive, the quantum yield decreased under sub-optimal (stressful) conditions. Statistically significant differences in Fv/Fm values between treatments were determined by a z-adjusted Mann–Whitney U test performed using Statistica 5.1 (Statsoft, USA; p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Motoneurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Effects of tDCS were estimated from changes in postsynaptic potentials evoked in individual motoneurons or in ventral root responses evoked by submaximal stimuli applied within the PTs and MLF. Repeated series of 10 or 20 stimuli were delivered at 2–3Hz, alternately to PTs and MLF, or by using overlapping short trains of PT and MLF stimuli. Responses to these stimuli were recorded during and after tDCs, and compared to those evoked before tDCS. The comparison included effects of a brief train of stimuli and it was noted after which stimuli the responses appeared and how their areas and latencies were affected by tDCS. Software for sampling and analysis developed by E. Eide, T. Holmström and N. Pihlgren (University of Gothenburg) was used for measurements of latencies and areas and to calculate the differences between the areas of the tested potentials from their averaged records.
Differences between data sets were assessed for statistical significance by using Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test, z-test or ANOVA with the adequate (Holm-Sidak or Dunn’s) post-hoc tests for determining differences to control (using Statistica 5.1, StatSoft or SigmaPlot 12.5 Systat software INC). For all tests the overall significance level was set at p<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!