The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss for windows version 16.0 chicago

Manufactured by IBM

SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago is a data analysis software package. It provides tools for data management, statistical analysis, and visualization.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

6 protocols using spss for windows version 16.0 chicago

1

Statistical Analysis of Social Science Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data was analysed using the Statistical Program for Social Science (SPSS) for Windows, Version 16.0 Chicago, SPSS Inc., 2007. The statistical data are reported as the mean ± SE, frequencies and percentages when appropriate. Comparison between two means and more than two means was done using student t-test and ANOVA test respectively. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were used to examine the relationship between different variables. A statistical significance was considered when P ≤ 0.05 and Logistic regression was used for calculating the odds ratio.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Retrospective Study of Deliberate Self-Harm Presentations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This is a retrospective study, of patients, presenting with DSH to the adult ED of Christian Medical College, Vellore, which is a 45-bed department in South India with an average of 200 admissions daily. All patients more than 15 years old presenting with a history of alleged DSH from January 01, 2011 to December 31, 2013, were included in the study. The patients were identified using the triage register of the ED. A retrospective chart review was performed on all the above said patients using the hospital's electronic medical database. The following were extracted: Demographics, age, sex, date of admission, type of DSH used, discharge status, and duration of admission.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc. Released 2007. Mean (standard deviation) were calculated for the continuous variables. The categorical variables were expressed in proportion and Chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to compare dichotomous variables. For all tests, a two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and patient confidentiality was maintained using unique identifiers and by password protected data entry software with restricted users.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were expressed as numbers and percentages for categorical variables and as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables. Data that did not fit a normal distribution were expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR). Continuous variables were compared using paired Student's t-tests and categorical variables were compared using Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test appropriately. Cutoff values were obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve, where we chose the point of the best sensitivity and specificity. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, version 16.0 Chicago, SPSS Inc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Retrospective Study of Near-Hanging Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This is a retrospective study, of patients presenting with near-hanging to the adult ED of a Medical College Hospital, which is a 45-bed department in South India with an average of 200 admissions daily. All patients more than 15-year-old presenting with near-hanging from August 2014 to August 2016 were included in the study. The patients were identified using the triage register of the ED. A retrospective chart review was performed on all the above-said patients using the hospital's electronic medical database. The following was extracted demographics, age, sex, date of admission, type of material used, complications such as low GCS, discharge status, and duration of admission.
Statistical analysis was performed using (SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc). Mean (standard deviation) were calculated for the continuous variables. The categorical variables were expressed in proportion and Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare dichotomous variables. For all tests, a two-sided P = 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and patient confidentiality was maintained using unique identifiers and by password protected data entry software with restricted users.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Postoperative Morphine Consumption and Knee Flexion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample size calculation was based on morphine consumption results from our previous study.[11 (link)] Assuming a level of significance of 5% and a power of 0.80, a minimum of 26 patients per group were required to detect a 30% reduction of morphine consumption. Due to a switch in our hospital protocol from morphine to piritramide, we accepted this because there is almost equipotency for these two drugs. It was also verified that this group size would suffice to detect a 5° improvement in knee flexion during physical therapy. To compensate for dropouts, 30 patients were included in each group. SPSS for Windows Version (16.0) Chicago: SPSS Inc. software was used for statistical analysis. The data were tested for a normal distribution with the one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. For comparing means of the primary endpoint results, an unpaired Student's t-test was used. The Chi-square test was used to detect differences in the incidence of medication side effects (number of nauseated or vomiting patients, dizziness, etc.). Data are presented as means and standard deviation or as numbers and frequency. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Analysis of Sample Typologies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square test (SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0.
Chicago, SPSS Inc.) and the significance assessed at p<0.05. The following parameters were compared: 1) proportions of sample typologies across areas and retail channel types; 2) proportions of CD compliances; 3)proportions of CD-and SN-identified samples were compared across areas, retail channel types and sample typologies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!