The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using mum1 mum1p

1

Immunohistochemical Marker Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded sections of each sample were immunostained. The antibodies (clones) used for IHC were as follows: anti-CD10 (56C6; Leica Microsystems, Wetzler, Germany), anti-CD20 (L-26; Dakocytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), anti-BCL2 (124; Dakocytomation), anti-BCL6 (P1F6; Leica Microsystems), and MUM1 (MUM1p; Dakocytomation). Each case was considered positive if more than ∼30% of the neoplastic cells were positive.21 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of FFPET Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All immunohistochemical analyses of FFPET were carried out using an automated immunostainer (Bond‐max; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The following primary antibodies and dilutions were used: CD20 (L26, 1:200), CD3 (PS‐1, 1:50), CD10 (56C6, 1:50), CD5 (4C7, 1:100), Ki‐67 (MIB‐1, 1:5000), LMP1 (1:10) (all Leica Microsystems); multiple myeloma oncogene 1 (MUM1) (MUM1p, 1:50), NFκB p65 (1:1000) (both from Dako, Glostrup, Denmark); BCL‐6 (D‐8, 1:100) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); germinal center B‐cell expressed transcript 1 (GCET1) (RAM341, 1:100), NFκB p105/p50 (E381, 1:250) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); NFκB2 p100/p52 (18D10, 1:100) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA); forkhead box protein P1 (FOXP1) (JC12, 1:500), and BACH2 (1:400) (both from Life Span Biosciences, Seattle, WA, USA). In situ hybridization with EBV‐encoded small RNA probes (Leica Microsystems) was used to detect EBV. A sample was scored as positive if >30% of the lymphoma cells were positively stained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Characterization of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded sections of each sample were immunostained. Antibodies (clones) used for immunohistochemistry were CD10 (56C6; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), CD20 (L-26; DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), BCL2 (124; DakoCytomation), BCL6 (P1F6; Leica Microsystems) and MUM1 (MUM1p; DakoCytomation). Each cases were considered positive if more than approximately 30% of the neoplastic cells were positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

DLBCL Subtyping and FOXO1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FFPE tissues were subjected to IHC using primary antibodies as follows: CD10 (56C6, Novocastra, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK), BCL-6 (LN22, Novocastra), MUM1 (MUM1P, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), GCET1 (polyclonal, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), FOXP1 (polyclonal, Abcam), FOXO1 (C29H4, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) and Bim (Y36, Abcam) using the Ventana Benchmark XT automated staining system (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA). DLBCL cases were immunohistochemically sub-grouped into GCB or ABC phenotypes according to the Choi algorithms, as previously described [49 (link)]. FOXO1 expression was evaluated according to the staining intensity (0-3) and location (nuclear vs. cytoplasmic).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of EBV-Related Lymphomas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin (FFPE), followed by staining of 3 μm-thick sections with hematoxylin and eosin. The immunohistochemistry for 12 EBVMCU cases was performed by an autoimmunostainer using BenchMark ULTRA (Ventana, Oro Valley, AZ, USA) and Leica Bond-III (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Monoclonal antibodies were as follows; anti-CD3/LN10, CD20/L26, CD10/56C6, BCL6/LN22, EBNA2/PE2 (Novocastra Laboratories, Newcastle, UK), CD30/Ber-H2, MUM-1/MUM1p, LMP1/C.S1-4 (DAKO, Santa Fe, CA, USA), CD15/MMA (Becton Dickinson and Company, NJ, USA), PD-L1/E1J2J (Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), PD-L1/SP142 (Roche, Basel, CHE). EBV infection was evaluated by in situ hybridizations for EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER) oligonucleotide probe (PB0589, Leica Biosystems) on FFPE sections using Leica Bond-III.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Lymphoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens were used in the ancillary study. Immunohistochemical staining of 4-μm paraffin sections were performed using a Bond Max automated immunostainer (Leica Biosystems, Melbourne, Australia). Monoclonal antibodies against CD20 (L26, 1/200; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), CD3 (polyclonal, 1/200; Dako), CD10 (56C6, 1/250; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), BCL6 (LN22, 1/80; Novocastra), MUM1 (MUM1p, 1/500; Dako), BCL2 (124, 1/100; Dako), and Myc (Y69, cat:ab32072, 1/100; Abcam, Burlingame, CA, USA) were used. The cell of origin (COO) subtype was determined using the Hans algorithm (16 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Staining Protocol for DLBCL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunohistochemical staining of DLBCLs was performed according to the protocol [18] (link). The immunohistochemistrical antibodies were listed as follows: CD10 (56C6, Dako), Bcl6 (M7211, Dako), MUM1 (MUM1p, Dako), Ki67 (MB1, Dako), P50 (sc-8414, Santa Cruz), P65 (#4764, Cell Signaling) and Notch2 (ab52302, Abcam). For Ki67 [26] (link) and Notch2 [27] (link), cases were considered to be positive when 25% or 20% of lymphoma cells were stained, respectively. For the rest antibodies, we defined 30% as the cut-off [28] (link), [29] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Profiling of DLBCL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples were processed as formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissues according to standard institutional procedures. We created tissue microarrays from samples from 61 patients and undertook evaluations of IHC with antibodies using these microarrays. Antibodies (clones) used for IHC included anti‐CD20 (L‐26; DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), anti‐BCL2 (clone124; DakoCytomation), anti‐BCL6 (P1F6; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), anti‐Multiple myeloma oncogene ‐1 (MUM ‐1) (MUM1p; DakoCytomation), anti‐CD10 (56C6; Leica Microsystems), and anti‐c‐MYC (Y69) antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Immunohistochemistry results were reviewed by two expert hematopathologists (H.M. and K.O.). Cut‐off points for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 protein expression were defined as DLBCL with 30% or more, 1% or more, and 30% or more positive cells, respectively, as recommended in previous studies.12, 15, 34
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!