The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using enrofloxacin

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of P. multocida and M. haemolytica isolates were tested for their susceptibility to amoxicillin (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), amikacin (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), enrofloxacin (5 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), and chlortetracycline (30 µg) disks (HiMedia, Mumbai) using disk diffusion method [10 ]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control strain. The interpretation of the results was based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints [11 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Sensitivity Profiling of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the bacterial isolates were tested in vitro for their sensitivity to different antibiotics commonly used in veterinary practices. The antibiotic disks oxytetracycline, amikacin, gentamicin, amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, amoxicillin sulbactam, ceftriaxone and sulbactam, ceftriaxone and tazobactam, enrofloxacin, ceftriaxone and cefotaxime (HiMedia) were selected for the study. The interpretation was done in accordance to performance standards for antimicrobial disks susceptibility tests, Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute [15 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Sensitivity Profiling of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The confirmed S. aureus isolates were subjected to antibiotic sensitivity test with linezolid (Bio-Rad), methicillin, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactum, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, imipenem-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, ceftriaxone, ceftriaxone-tazobactam, enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin and gentamicin antibiotic discs procured from HiMedia, India following CLSI (Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute) guidelines [21 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling using Disk Diffusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method described by Bauer et al. [28 (link)] was used to perform an antimicrobial susceptibility test on Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) (HiMedia) using the following antibiotic disks: Cephalexin (30 μg/disk), ampicillin (10 μg/disk), streptomycin (10 μg/disk), gentamycin (10 μg/disk), colistin (10 μg/disk), enrofloxacin (5 μg/disk), nalidixic acid (30 μg/disk), ceftriaxone (30 μg/disk), ceftazi­dime (30 μg/disk), oxytetracycline (30 μg/disk), cefixime (5 μg/disk), and kanamycin (30 μg/disk) (HiMedia). The zone sizes of bacteria were compared with standards for resistance and sensitivity stated by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [29 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Urinary Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Different strains of various organisms isolated from urine samples of the infected animals were subjected to in vitro drug sensitivity testing, using 15 antimicrobials by the disc-diffusion method. With the help of a platinum loop, a small amount of test culture was transferred into a tube of brain heart infusion broth and incubated for 2-5 h at 37°C, to obtain turbidity. With the help of a sterile cotton swab, the broth culture was then evenly spread by smearing over the surface of BA/Mueller-Hinton agar plates. The antimicrobial discs were placed on the agar and gently pressed. These were then incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The sensitivity was observed on the basis of zone size interpretation chart, provided by the manufacturer. Different antimicrobials used were amikacin (10 mcg), amoxicillin (10 mcg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (30 mcg), ampicillin (25 mcg), cefoperazone (75 mcg), ceftriaxone (10 mcg), ceftriaxone–tazobactam (30mcg), chloramphenicol (25 mcg), cloxacillin (30 mcg), enrofloxacin (10 mcg), gentamicin (30 mcg), neomycin (30 mcg), oxytetracycline (30 mcg), penicillin-G (10 units), and streptomycin (25 mcg) (Hi-Media). To remain conservative in our estimates of resistance, isolates exhibiting intermediate zones of inhibition were interpreted as resistant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed using Kibry-Bauer disk diffusion method on Muller Hinton agar (HiMedia-India). Isolates were tested for the following antibiotics; ciprofloxacin (5 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), streptomycin (10 μg), enrofloxacin (30 μg), co-trimoxazole (Thrimethoprimsulfmethoxazole) (25 μg), gentamycin (10 μg), amoxicillin (10 μg) and ceftriaxone (30 μg) (HiMedia-India). According to the width of the inhibitory zone, the pattern of drug sensitivity was determined as susceptible and resistant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Sensitivity Patterns of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro antibiotic sensitivity patterns of the isolates were conducted as per the method of Bauer et al., (1966) . Antibiotics disc (Hi Media Ltd., Mumbai, India) used in the present study were Amikacin (30 mcg), Amoxyclav (30 mcg), Ampicillin (10 mcg), Ciprofloxacin (5 mcg), Colistin (10 mcg), Ceftriaxone (30 mcg), Erythromycin (15 mcg), Enrofloxacin (10 mcg), Gentamicin (10mcg), Neomycin (30 mcg), Penicillin-G (10IU), Streptomycin (10 mcg), Sulphadiazine (300 mcg) and Tetracycline (30 mcg). Diameters of the clear zone of inhibition were measured and the interpretation of the results was made in accordance with the instructions supplied by the manufacturer (Hi Media Ltd., Mumbai, India). Multiple Antibiotic resistance index (MARI) were also determined for each isolates by dividing the number of antibiotics to which the isolate is resistant to by the total numbers of antibiotics tested (Adenaike, 2016) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!