The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using er tracker red dye

1

Transient Expression Assay in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A transient expression assay was performed using a method described previously (Reyes et al., 2010 (link); Gao et al., 2013 (link)). Briefly, 4-week-old tobacco plants and fresh maize calli were used for the transient assays. Agrobacterium cells transformed with plasmids harboring a cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) fusion gene of interest were infiltrated into plant tissues. For detection of PB fractions, the dilute samples were incubated with ER tracker red dye (Molecular Probes, ThermoFisher) and rhodamine B hexyl ester (Molecular Probes, ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were obtained using a Zeiss confocal microscope LSM 710 (Carl Zeiss). We used 458-, 587-, and 528-nm laser excitation and 460–510,600–630, and 527–570 nm long-pass emission filters to detect CFP, ER tracker red dye, and rhodamine B hexyl ester, respectively. All images were analyzed using the Image J software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Visualizing EAAT3, ARFGAP1, and ARF6 in cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For confocal microscopy, 2.5 × 105 transfected cells expressing GFP-tagged EAAT3, CFP-tagged ARFGAP1 or CFP-tagged ARF6 were seeded onto 22 mm glass bottom dishes (Invitro Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, United States). The endoplasmic reticulum was visualized with the ER-Tracker™ Red dye (100 nM: Molecular Probes, Leiden, Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The plasma membrane was stained with trypan blue as described earlier (Korkhov et al., 2006 (link)). Images were captured Zeiss LSM780 equipped with an argon laser (at 30 milliwatts) and a 63x oil immersion objective (1.4 NA, Zeiss Plan-Neofluar). The images were processed using the Zen 2010 B SP1 software (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Spatial and Temporal Regulation of PECP1 and PS2 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GUS expression assay of PECP1-GUS and PS2-GUS proteins were performed at various growth stages and at different phosphate availability with histochemical GUS staining as described previously (Lin et al., 2015 (link)).
Venus fluorescence observation of Pi-starved ProPECP1:PECP1-Ven pecp1-1 ps2-3 and ProPS2:PS2-Ven pecp1-1 ps2-3 seedlings was performed under a confocal microscope (LSM 510 Meta; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with Plan-Apochromat 20×/0.8-NA, and Plan-Apochromat 10×/0.45-NA. For staining of the plasma membrane or ER, seedlings were immersed in 5 μg/ml of FM 4-64 (F34653, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for 2 min or immersed in 2 μM of the ER-Tracker Red dye (E34250, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for 30 min, prior to confocal microscopic observation. Images were captured by use of LSM 510 v3.2 (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with filters for Venus (514 nm laser, 520–555 nm band-pass), for FM 4-64 (543 nm laser, 560–615 nm band-pass), and for ER-Tracker Red dye (543 nm laser, 560 nm long pass).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Subcellular Stress Response Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The original strain BY4741 (CK) and the candidate gene knockout strains were cultured overnight in a constant temperature shaker incubator at 30°C and 200 r/min, and the cells labeled as 0 h were collected at this time. Then, in YPD + G418 liquid medium, the original strain BY4741 and the gene knockout strain broth cultures that had been incubated overnight were separately added to YPD + G418 liquid medium containing 1.6 g/L CA (OD600 = 0.8), and cultured for another 3 h at 30°C and 200 r/min, and the cells labeled as 3 h were collected. The collected 0 h and 3 h broths were separately added to 1.5 mL EP tubes (OD600 = 1.0), and the centrifuged broths were stained with the stains (thawed in advance)-Diaminophenylindole (DAPI) (purchased from Shanghai Shenggong Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), Mito Tracker Green FM, ER-Tracker Red dye, Yeast Vacuole Membrane Marker MDY-64 (all purchased from Thermo Scientific), and 2′7′-DCFdiacetate (purchased from Sigma), respectively. Afterwards, changes insubcellular structures were observed in real time using a fluorescence microscope equipped with DIC, GFP, Rhod, and DAPI filters, and the accumulation of ROS, chromatin disorder, mitochondrial damage, endoplasmic reticulum damage, and vacuole damage in the cells were statistically analyzed (Li et al., 2023 (link); Wang et al., 2023 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Localization of Hgt1p TMD9 Charged Residue Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To localize the different charged residue mutants of TMD9 of Hgt1p that were created, indirect immunofluorescence was performed using a published protocol modified as described earlier (Kaur et al. 2009 (link)). For staining of ER (endoplasmic reticulum), live yeast cells were incubated with the ER-Tracker TM Red dye (BODIPY TR glibenclamide; Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and by other published literatures (Feng et al. 2010 (link); Mandal et al. 2012 (link); Rawal et al. 2013 (link)). Images were obtained with an inverted LSM510 META laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss) fitted with a Plan-Apochromat ×100 (numerical aperture, 1.4) oil immersion objective. The 488-nm line of an argon ion laser was directed over an HFT UV/488 beam splitter, and fluorescence was detected using an NFT 490 beam splitter in combination with a BP 505 to 530 band pass filter. ER-Tracker fluorescence was detected at Ex/Em 587/615. Images obtained were processed using Adobe Photoshop version 5.5
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence analysis of SOD1 inclusions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The transfected cells on coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were then permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS for 10 min, followed by 1 h of treatment with a blocking solution consisting of normal goat serum (1:200, Abcam, ab7481) in PBS. The pan-SOD1 antibody (1:400, Genetex; GTX100554) solution, diluted in the blocking solution, was added to the cell solution overnight at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, we incubated the cells with Alexa Fluor 488 antibody (Goat anti-Rabbit IgG, 1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, #A-11008) at 4 °C for 6 h. The nucleus was stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) was stained using ER-TrackerTM Red dye (Invitrogen) for 10 min. After washing the coverslips three times with PBS, we mounted the coverslips with mounting solution (H-5501; Vector Laboratories) for fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss).
For inclusion positive cells counting, immunofluorescence images with SOD1 antibodies were counted in randomly selected fields. Depending on SOD1 staining, inclusion positive cells were counted based on the strong intensity of SOD1 and expressed as a percentage of total cells counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The c-terminal (aa 175–239) and n-terminal (aa 1–174) fragments of YFP were PCR amplified from pEYFP-Pds1Δdestruction box (383) which was a gift from Jonathon Pines (Addgene plasmid # 39848), sequenced, and cloned as an in-frame fusion to pEGFP-N1 containing NAF-1 or mNT [19 (link)]. The linker sequence DPRSIAT was used for connecting the mNT/NAF-1 proteins to the YFPc/YFPn fragments. HEK-293 cells plated in EMEM (ATCC 30–2003) with 10% FBS on coverslips coated with collagen (A1048301, gibco) were co-transfected with the different fusion protein constructs (S1A Fig), using the GeneJuice Transfection Reagent (70967–3, Novagen; [4 (link)–6 (link)]). Following staining with the ER-Tracker Red Dye (E34250, Invitrogen) or MitoTracker Deep Red FM (M22426, Invitrogen), complete FluoroBrite DMEM (A18967-01, Gibco) medium was used to replace the RPMI medium 1640, and confocal images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope. YFP, Mito-Tracker, ER-Tracker and DAPI were excited by a 488nm Argon, 561nm diode, 633nm diode and 405nm Diode laser respectively, and their fluorescence was detected at 508-604nm, 635-722nm, 585-700nm and 400-585nm, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Labeling Live Membrane Proteins in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For live cell membrane protein labelling, Piezo1−/− HEK293T cells were plated on 96 well clear bottom plate (ThermoFisher) coated with 0.1 mg/ml of Poly-L-Lysine (Sigma). Cells were transfected with pIRES-GFP constructs carrying WT or mutant Piezo1 (125 ng cDNA per well) with PEI. Sixty to 72 h after transfection, live labelling was performed by incubating the cells with anti-HA (Sigma, 1:100) antibody for 20 min at 37°C. The cells were then washed with DMEM six times before being incubated with Alexa Fluor 555 anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:200) for 15 min at room temperature (22°C). Cells were washed again 5 times with DMEM and twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min at room temperature. PFA was washed off and replaced with PBS before confocal analysis.
For co-labelling of Piezo1 and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), HeLa cells were transfected with WT or mutant Piezo1 fused with GFP. After transfection for 60–72 h, cells were washed with PBS twice then incubated with 1 μM of ER-Tracker Red dye (Invitrogen) for 20 min at 37°C. The cells were washed again with PBS three times and fixed with 4% PFA for 20 min at room temperature. PFA was then replaced with PBS, and the ER or Piezo1-GFP signals were visualized using confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 700 inverted).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Subcellular Localization of TAPE in N. benthamiana

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For subcellular localization analysis in N. benthamiana epidermal cells, the cloned p35S-driven constructs were transformed into A. tumefaciens GV3101 using the freeze-thaw method and transformed GV3101 were infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves using a N. benthamiana infiltration assay as previously reported (Sparkes et al., 2006 (link)). After 72 h of infiltration, leaves were observed using an LSM 510 META confocal scanning laser microscope (CSLM; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). GFP and RFP fluorescence was observed under 488/505–530 and 543/560–615 nm filters (excitation/emission wavelength), respectively. Images were analyzed and exported using Zeiss ZEN lite software.
The subcellular localization of TAPE in the PT of the pTAPE::TAPE-GFP plant was also imaged using CSLM. To visualize the PM and ER, the elongated PTs were stained with 10 µΜ FM4-64 (T13320; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and 1 µM ER-Tracker Red dye (E34250; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). To determine the AF-dependent movement of TAPE, 2 nM or 10 nM LatB was added to the infiltrated leaves and PT, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibody Staining and Organelle Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies against p65 (C-20), SNF2H (H300), Tubulin (TU-02) and HA-probe (HA.C5) were acquired from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-JMJD8 and PDIA3 antibodies were purchased from Abnova. The anti-calnexin antibody was purchased from Abcam. Antibodies against EEA1 (C45B10), RCAS1 (D2B6N), AIF (D39D2), Kinectin 1 (D5F7J) and Lyric/Metadherin (MTDH) (2F11C3) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. LysoTracker® Red DND-99 and ER-Tracker™ Red dye were purchased from Invitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!