The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using miseq platform

1

Targeted Sequencing for Hereditary Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed using the MiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) with OncoPanel_AMCv3 (OP_AMCv3, Celemics Inc., Seoul, Korea) to capture the exons of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Genomic DNA (200 ng) from normal small intestine mucosa was fragmented to 250 bp by sonication (Covaris Inc., Woburn, MA, USA), followed by size selection using Agencourt AMPure XP beads. A DNA library was prepared by ligation of 50 ng of purified DNA with a TruSeq adaptor using the SureSelect XT Reagent Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Each library was made with sample-specific barcodes 6 bp in size and quantified using PicoGreen, and eight libraries were pooled to a total of 700 ng for hybrid capture using an OP_AMCv3 RNA bait. The concentration of the enriched target was measured by quantitative PCR (Kapa Biosystems, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA), and samples were loaded onto the MiSeq platform for paired-end sequencing. The data were analyzed with a laboratory-developed pipeline for variant calling. Variants with more than 20× depth were considered as true candidates. The found variants from targeted panel sequencing were assessed by the LOVD (LOVD v.2.0 Build 36) and InSiGHT (LOVD v.3.0 Build 17) database and ClinVar archive to identify novel germline mutations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive HCV Genotype 3b Sequencing from Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from 200 μL plasma using the AgencourtRNAdvance blood kit (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA) and then reverse-transcribed using Superscript III (Invitrogen, CA, USA). The preparation of libraries and the sequencing were performed as in a previous study [19 (link)]. Briefly, double-stranded DNA was generated with an NEB Second Strand Synthesis kit (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). After that, the KAPA Library Prep kit (KAPA Biosystems, Boston, MA, USA) was used to prepare libraries and pooled at equimolar concentrations for sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform (v3 chemistry). Bioinformatic processing was performed as before [19 (link)]. First, the raw reads were trimmed using trim_galore (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/ accessed on 3 July 2022). Next, the clean reads were enriched in silico by removing the human and rRNA reads (Ribopicker, http://ribopicker.sourceforge.net/, accessed on 3 July 2022) and then matched against whole-genome HCV reference sequences using Tanoti (http://bioinformatics.cvr.ac.uk/tanoti.php, accessed on 3 July 2022). For GT-3b, because there are only 14 full-length sequences in NCBI, these reads were iteratively assembled using the SPAdes de novo assembler [20 (link)]. Finally, the same files were generated using Tanoti, and a majority consensus sequence was generated for sites with >5 reads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genome Sequencing of E. albertii Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomes of the three E. albertii strains CB9786, NIAH_Bird_3, and EC06-170 were sequenced using the Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium platform, 400–500 bp shotgun fragments and 8 kb-span paired end libraries. The sequence reads were assembled with GS Assembler ver. 2.3, and gaps were filled by sequencing fosmid clones and PCR products that spanned the gaps using a capillary sequencer (ABI3730). The three strains were resequenced with the Illumina MiSeq platform to correct sequencing errors made by the Roche 454. The protein-coding sequences (CDSs) and functional annotations were predicted using the Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MiGAP; http://www.migap.org, last accessed November 12, 2015). Manual curation was performed using the in silico Molecular Cloning Genomics Edition software (IMC-GE; In Silico Biology, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

S1 Fig shows a flow chart of the strategy used to detect mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, to predict damaging mutations and to identify driver/passenger mutations. Frameshift and nonsense mutations were considered to be deleterious.
Sanger sequencing of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes was performed as described previously [13 (link)], using the CEQ 8000 System (Beckman Coulter, Inc, CA, USA) or the ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer (AB-Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific Corporation, MA, USA). The sequenced data were analyzed using the SeqMan Pro v.8.1.2 (Lasergene; DNASTAR, Madison, WI) software.
More recent DNA samples were sequenced by next-generation sequencing, either by SureSelect capture (Agilent Technologies Inc, CA, USA) followed by sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform, or SeqCap EZ capture (Roche Nimblegen, Basel, Switzerland) with sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq platform.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fab Phage-Display Library Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed with a previously described Fab phage-display library11 (link) based on the pComb3X vector.3 The library was deeply sequenced 5 times, in the Illumina MiSeq platform, and in a single experiment with 454 pyrosequencing (Roche). For each sequencing experiment, VH and VL amplicons were obtained as described above. The NGS raw data are shown in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Soil Metagenomic DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total genomic DNA from 0.5 g of soil sample was extracted using the FastDNA Spin kit for soil (MPbio, United States), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The V3–V4 regions of bacterial 16S rRNA genes from the total genomic DNA were PCR-amplified and sequenced using a Illumina Miseq platform (Roche, Germany) at Macrogen (Korea) after pooling the PCR products, as described previously (Miran et al., 2017 (link)). The Illumina Miseq sequencing data of the pooled PCR products were sorted based on their unique barcode sequences and then the barcode and adapter sequences were trimmed using Scythe (Catchen et al., 2011 (link); Buffalo, 2014 ) and Sickel software (Joshi and Fass, 2011 ). The sorted sequencing data were processed and classified using Mothur software v. 1.39.5 following MiSeq SOP3. In brief, low-quality sequencing reads with ambiguous base calls (“N”) and those shorter than 200-bp were removed and potential chimeric sequences were also excluded from the next analysis. Representative sequences of operational taxonomic units that were clustered at 3% divergence were classified at the genus level against the Silva v128 database (Quast et al., 2013 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!