The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

43 protocols using las v3

1

Muscle Damage Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Control (n = 4), EC-damaged (EC, n = 4) and EC + MSC-CM (n = 4) muscle samples were processed for paraffin embedding as previously reported [8 (link)]. Deparaffinized tissue sections (5 μm thick) were routinely stained with H&E. Observations were performed with a light microscope (Leica DM4000 B) furnished of a digital color camera (DFC310 FX 1.4-megapixel) and the software application suite LAS V3.8 (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany). The number of myofibers with the typical morphological signs of cell damage was evaluated by two independent observers and reported as percentage of the total number of myofibers per microscopic field (×40).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Light and Electron Microscopy of Intestinal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For light microscopy (LM), INCs were mounted onto glass microscope slides, suspended in water, sealed with coverslips, and then viewed under an Axiophot light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) operating in brightfield mode using the objective of 20× magnification. Representative light micrographs of cells were captured using a Leica DFC320 camera equipped with the Leica software application suite LAS V3.8 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Digesta samples taken after 0 and 120 min of the small intestinal digestion were stained with 2% (w/v) Lugol’s iodine solution and visualised under LM for detecting the presence of starch.
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), INCs were directly mounted on double-sided adhesive tapes on aluminium stubs, sputter coated with gold (SCD 050, Balzers, Liechtenstein), and viewed under a scanning electron microscope (FEI Quanta 200 FEI Electron Optics, Eindhoven, the Netherlands). Representative electron micrographs of cell samples were captured with accelerating voltage of 25 kV and using the xT microscope software version 3.0.7 (FEI Quanta, Eindhoven, the Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Analysis of Gastric Fundus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Untreated (CTRL) and ADPN-treated gastric fundus full-thickness specimens (n = 3 each) were fixed with 10% formalin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), dehydrated with a graded alcohol series, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin. At least ten 5 µm-thick sections were cut from each sample (n = 30 for each experimental condition), deparaffinized, and routinely stained with H&E. Tissue morphology was then recorded under a light microscope (Leica DM4000 B) equipped with a DFC310 FX 1.4-megapixel digital color camera and software application suite LAS V3.8 (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of α-Klotho

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MVECs were seeded onto glass coverslips, grown to 70% confluence, fixed with 3.7% buffered paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS. Slides were then washed, treated with 3% H2O2 in PBS for 15 minutes at room temperature and subsequently blocked with Ultra V block (UltraVision Large Volume Detection System Anti-Polyvalent, HRP; LabVision) for 10 minutes. Cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit monoclonal anti-human α-Klotho antibody (catalog number ab181373; Abcam) at 1:20 dilution in 1% BSA in PBS, followed by incubation with biotinylated secondary antibodies and streptavidin peroxidase (UltraVision Large Volume Detection System Anti-Polyvalent, HRP; LabVision) at room temperature.
Immunoreactivity was developed with 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC kit; LabVision). Irrelevant isotype-matched and concentration-matched rabbit IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) were used as negative controls. Nuclei were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Bio-Optica). Immunolabeled cells were examined with a Leica DM4000 B microscope (Leica Microsystems) and photomicrographs were captured with a Leica DFC310 FX 1.4-megapixel digital colour camera equipped with the Leica software application suite LAS V3.8 (Leica Microsystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Assessing Root Cell Viability in Cucumbers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The length of primary root was measured every day to calculate the average increment during the whole treatment period. After 7 days of treatment, cucumber roots were cut off and photographed. Root cell viability was then assessed by fluorescein diacetate (FDA)–propidium iodide (PI) double staining method as described by Bose et al. (2014 (link)). Root segments, including the root tip (1 cm), were cut off and stained with 5 μg mL−1 FDA for 3 min followed by 3 μg mL−1 PI for 10 min. Then the stained roots were observed using a Leica DM2500 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Excitation wavelengths of 488 and 594 nm were used for FDA and PI imaging, respectively. Images were acquired with a digital camera (Leica DFC495, Leica Microsystems) equipped with a LAS V3.8 (Leica Microsystems) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Malaria Parasite Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The blood smears were fixed with absolute methanol and stained with 10% Giemsa Methylene Blue Eosin Merck® diluted in distilled water (pH 7.0 for 50 min), according to Eisen and Schall [26 (link)], at the Parasitology division from UNESP, Botucatu. For morphological analysis of the intra-erythrocytic parasite stages, digital images were captured and measured using a compound microscope at 1000× magnification with the Leica software application suite LAS V3.8 (Leica Microsystems). Measurements are in micrometres (μm) comprising the parasite’s length and width, with mean and standard deviation (means ± standard deviation) given. Parasitaemia was calculated per 100 erythrocytes, with ~104 erythrocytes examined per blood smear following Cook et al. [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histological Analysis of Muscle Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both EC-injured and control EDL muscles (n = 5 each) were fixed with 10% formalin in PBS, dehydrated with a graded alcohol series, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin. Muscles sections (5 μm thick) were deparaffinized and routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Tissue morphology was then observed under a light microscope (Leica DM4000 B) equipped with a DFC310 FX 1.4-megapixel digital color camera and the software application suite LAS V3.8 (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Apoptosis Assay in Dermal Microvascular Endothelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
dMVECs were grown to confluence on glass coverslips, starved in EBM with 2% FBS overnight and then incubated for 24 hours in EBM containing 2% FBS and 10% of serum from lSSc or dSSc patients, naïve or under pharmacological therapy with CYC, or 10% of serum from healthy controls. dMVECs were subsequently fixed in 3.7% buffered paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS. For immunofluorescent detection and quantification of cell apoptosis we used the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) technology (Fluorescein Isothiocyanate (FITC) In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit; Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Nuclei were counterstained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The stained cells were observed under a Leica DM4000 B microscope (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany) and photographed using a Leica DFC310 FX 1.4-megapixel digital colour camera equipped with the Leica software application suite LAS V3.8 (Leica Microsystems). The percentage of apoptotic dMVEC nuclei was calculated as TUNEL/DAPI-positive nuclei in proportion to all DAPI-positive nuclei. Counting was performed on ten randomly chosen microscopic fields (x40 original magnification) per sample by two independent blinded observers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Histological Analysis of Gastric Fundus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gastric fundus muscle samples were embedded in paraffin (n = 3 each) after being fixed with 10% formalin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), dehydrated with a graded alcohol series and cleared in xylene. From each sample (n = 30 for each experimental condition), at least 10 sections (thickness 5 µm) were sliced and colored with H&E. Morphological analysis of the tissue was achieved by a light microscope (Leica DM4000 B) equipped with a DFC310 FX 1.4-megapixel digital color camera and software application suite LAS V3.8 (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microscopic Analysis of Intraerythrocytic Parasites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The blood smears were fixed with absolute methanol and stained with 10% Giemsa Methylene Blue Eosin Merck® diluted in distilled water (pH 7.0 for 50min), according to Eisen and Schall (2000) (link). For morphological analysis of the intra-erythrocytic parasite stages, digital images were captured and measured using a compound microscope at 1000 × magnification with the Leica software application suite LAS V3.8 (Leica Microsystems). Measurements are in micrometres (μm) comprising the parasite's length, width and area, with mean and standard deviation (means ± standard deviation) given. Parasitaemia was calculated per 100 erythrocytes, with ~104 erythrocytes examined per blood smear following Cook et al. (2009) .
The effect of the parasite on the erythrocytes was evaluated by the comparison of infected and non-infected parameters using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney Test, with a significance level of 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!