The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3.0t mri scanner

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in Netherlands, United States

The Philips 3.0T MRI scanner is a high-field magnetic resonance imaging device designed for clinical and research applications. It utilizes a 3.0 tesla (3.0T) superconducting magnet to generate a strong and uniform magnetic field, enabling the acquisition of high-resolution images of the body's internal structures and functions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

49 protocols using 3.0t mri scanner

1

High-Resolution 3D MRI Brain Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We acquired 3-dimensional T1 turbo field echo (TFE), 3-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and diffusion tensor imaging sequences using 3.0T MRI scanners (Philips, Best, the Netherlands). The MR imaging was performed following the protocol described in our previous work49 (link),50 (link). The 3-dimensional T1 MRI data were acquired using the following imaging parameters: sagittal slice thickness, 1.0 mm with 50% overlap; no gap; repetition time of 9.9 ms; echo time of 4.6 ms; flip angle of 8°; and matrix size of 240 × 240 pixels reconstructed to 480 × 480 over a field of view of 240 mm. In whole-brain DTI-MRI examination, sets of axial diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar images were collected with the following parameters: 128 3 128 acquisition matrix; 1.72 3 1.72 3 2 mm3 voxel size; 70 axial slices; 22 3 22 cm2 field of view; echo time 60 ms, repetition time 7,696 ms; flip angle 90°; slice gap 0 mm; b-factor of 600 s/mm2. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired from 45 different directions using the baseline image without weighting (0, 0, 0). All axial sections were acquired parallel to the anterior commissure–posterior commissure line.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Prone Position Breast MRI Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MR imaging examinations were performed with the patients in the prone position by using a GE 1.5T MRI scanners or two Philips 3.0T MRI scanners with breast surface coils. Axial T2-weighted images, T1-weighted images, DWI, dynamic enhanced images were performed. Each MR had a slice thickness of 2–5 mm, matrix of 80×80–256×256, field of view (FOV) of 35cm, depending on different scanners and scan sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

3D MRI Imaging for Deep Brain Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patients were scanned with 3.0 T MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) with 32‐channel head coil, and the patients’ heads were immobilized accurately with head cushions before surgery. The whole‐head three‐dimensional sagittal T1‐weighted‐3D magnetization‐prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP‐RAGE) sequence (repetition time: 6.6 ms, echo time: 3.1 ms, flip angle: 8°, matrix size: 240 × 240, isotropic voxel: 1 × 1 × 1 mm3, number of slices: 196) was acquired from each participant. Also, the T2‐weighted image and fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery were scanned for surgical planning and STN localization. Preoperative (with Leksel frame) and postoperative (the time the IPG was turned on) computed tomography (CT) (thickness: 0.625 mm; General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Healthy Knee MRI Examination Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This cross-sectional observational study was approved by the Institutional Review Board Ethics Committee of China-Japan Union Hospital (IRB No. 2016-nsfc028). All subjects provided signed informed consent prior to undergoing the MRI examination. All eligible volunteers were required to undergo MRI of the selected knee for review in the clinical imaging system using a Phillips 3.0-T MRI scanner. Volunteers were placed in the supine position with the knee fully extended. MRI scans were performed in coronal, sagittal, and horizontal position of the knee joint by 3-D dual-echo steady-state (3D-DESS), with a layer thickness of 0.5 mm. From January 2018 to January 2019, 40 (out of 98) volunteers were recruited from the community through use of research flyers. Eleven participants were later found to meet the exclusion criteria after taking MRI scans, and were therefore excluded from the present study. The inclusion criteria were: no knee joint pain or instability, skeletally mature, and healthy. The exclusion criteria were: congenital meniscus dysplasia, meniscus-related lesions, and preexisting cruciate ligament injuries. Finally, 29 subjects (10 men, 19 women, mean age 26 years [range, 20–33 years]) with 116 menisci (58 lateral and 58 medial) were included in the study (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Biodistribution of EuCF-DTG Nanoparticles in Macaques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biodistribution of EuCF-DTG nanoparticles in rhesus macaques was determined using a Philips Achieva (Briarcliff Manor, NY, USA) 3.0T MRI scanner. T2-weighted high-resolution imaging and T2 mappings were obtained. High resolution T2-weighted images were acquired using a turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence with 1428.6 ms repetition time, 90 ms echo time, 90° flip angle, 116 echo train length, 22 slices (3.5 mm slice thickness; 4.5 mm spacing between slices), 360 × 360 acquisition matrix, 360 × 360 mm FOV, 6 averages, for a total scan time of 31.42 min. A multi-echo TSE sequence was used for T2 relaxation time mapping. Images were acquired with 2000 ms repetition time, 16 echoes (echo times TEn = n x 6 ms; n = 1, …,16), 288 x 288 acquisition matrix, 360 × 360 mm FOV. This sequence was repeated to cover multiple coronal slices (12 slices for pre-injection and 16 slices for post-injection, 3.5 mm slice thickness, 4.5 mm spacing between slices). T2 relaxation time maps were created using custom-developed computer programs using IDL programming language. ROI analysis was performed using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

High-resolution Diffusion Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) were acquired on a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Philips, Best, The Netherlands) using a 32-channel head coil and a single shot EPI with SENSE (parallel) acquisition. Sagittal diffusion slices were obtained using the following parameters: bvalue 1300s/mm², repetition time 7600 ms, echo time 65 ms, isotropic voxel size 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 mm, 60 non-collinear directions and 6 non-diffusion-weighted images. The scan acquisition time was 10:32 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Brachial Plexus MRI Protocol at 3T

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent an MRI scan of the brachial plexus and cervical nerve roots on a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) using a 24-channel head neck coil. All participants were positioned in supine position. We performed 3D turbo spin echo spectral presaturation with inversion recovery (SPIR) in a coronal and sagittal slice orientation with the following acquisition parameters: field of view = 336 × 336 × 170 mm, matrix size = 224 × 223, voxel size = 0.75 × 0.75 × 1 mm3, echo time = 206 ms, repetition time = 2200 ms, turbo spin echo factor = 76, sense factor = 3 (P reduction right/left) and 1.5 (S reduction anterior/posterior), acquisition time = 03:59 min. A coronal slab maximum intensity projection (MIP) was created as a post-processing step (slab thickness = 10 mm, number of slabs = 75).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Diffusion MRI Acquisition and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data of participants at baseline were acquired on Philips 3.0 T MRI scanner equipped with a 8-channel SENSE head-coil. 32 non-collinear (b value = 1000 s/mm2)-direction diffusion images and a no-diffusion weighting (b0) were collected using echo-planar imaging sequence with the following parameters: field of view (FOV) = 256 × 256, TR/TE = 10086/91 ms, 2 mm slice thickness with no gap, matrix = 128 × 128, voxel size = 2 × 2 × 2 mm3. All images were corrected for eddy current distortion and head movement by registering diffusion-weighted images to b0 and adjusting rotations of b-matrix using FMRIB’s diffusion toolbox (FDT), part of FMRIB Software Library (FSL). FA and MD were calculated by DTIfit (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FDT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multimodal Neuroimaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MR imaging was performed on the same 3.0 T MRI scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). The magnetic resonance sequences were as follows: T1-weighted, T2-weighted, DWI, T2-FLAIR, 3d-TOF-MRA and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Resting-State fMRI and Structural MRI Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MRI images were obtained by using a Philips 3.0T MRI scanner, and gradient echo plane imaging (EPI) was used to obtain resting state images of all participants. The scanning parameters were provided: 2000 ms was TR, 30 ms was TE, 220 mm × 220 mm was field of vision, 90° was turning angle, 64 × 64 was matrix, 36 was number of layers, 4 mm was thickness, 400 s was scanning time. Magnetization-prepared gradient echo (MPRAGE) was used to obtain 3D-T1 images. TR/TE: 8.5/3.4 ms, field of view: 240 mm × 240 mm × 150 mm, scanning matrix size: 256 × 256 × 256, flip angle: 12° [44 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!